If a person in the Territory or elsewhere, whether a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or not— a…
paragraph 1(3) of SCHEDULE 1 of The Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978 (Overseas Territories) Order 1979
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Indictable only
- Terrorism, official secrets and national security
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
3 If a person in the Territory or elsewhere, whether a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or not— a makes to another person a threat that any person will do an act which is an offence mentioned in paragraph (a) of the preceding subsection; or b attempts to make or aids, abets, counsels or procures the making of such a threat to another person, with the intention that the other person shall fear that the threat will be carried out, the person who makes the threat or, as the case may be, who attempts to make it or aids, abets, counsels or procures the making of it, shall in the Territory be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and not exceeding the term of imprisonment to which a person would be liable for the offence constituted by doing the act threatened at the place where the conviction occurs and at the time of the offence to which the conviction relates.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (with the intention that).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: with the intention that.
What would breach paragraph 1(3) of SCHEDULE 1?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978 (Overseas Territories) Order 1979.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Indictable only — tried in the Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 10 years
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 11 April 1979
- In force from
- 24 May 1979
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order extends sections 1, 2 and 3 of the Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978, subject to exceptions, adaptations and modifications, to the territories specified in Schedule 2 hereto. The purpose of the Act is to give effect to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, signed at New York on 14th December 1973.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- If a person in the Territory or elsewhere, whether a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies or not— a…paragraph 1(2) of SCHEDULE 1
- a attempts to commit an offence which, by virtue of the preceding subsection or otherwise, is an offence…paragraph 1(2)(a) of SCHEDULE 1
- a makes to another person a threat that any person will do an act which is an offence mentioned in paragraph…paragraph 1(3)(a) of SCHEDULE 1
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.62.
- Basis
- the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
- Confidence
- 0.62 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Internationally Protected Persons Act 1978 (Overseas Territories) Order 1979 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Terrorism, official secrets and national securityOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1979