The Uzbekistan (Restrictive Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2006
UK Statutory Instrument 2006 No. 310 — creates 13 criminal offences.
- Made
- 14 February 2006
- In force from
- 16 February 2006
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
- Made under
- Her by section 112 of the Saint Helena Act 1833
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
This Order applies to each of the British overseas territories listed in Schedule 1. It gives effect in these overseas territories to Council Common Position 2005/792/CFSP adopted by the Council of the European Union on 14th November 2005 which prohibits (a) the delivery or supply of arms and related material to Uzbekistan, from Members States' territories, by their nationals, or using their flagged vessels and aircraft; (b) the provision of technical assistance, brokering services and other services related to military activities and to the provision, manufacture, maintenance and use of arms and related material to any person, entity or body in, or for use in Uzbekistan; and (c) the provision of financing or financial assistance related to military activities to any person, entity or body, in or for use in, Uzbekistan.
Offences created by this instrument
- Provisions supplementary to articles 10 to 12 article 13(3) · Revoked · Requires proof of a state of mind
- Supply of restricted goods article 3(1) · Revoked · Strict liability
- Exportation of restricted goods to Uzbekistan article 4(3) · Revoked · Requires proof of a state of mind
- Provision of assistance, advice or training related to military activities article 5 · Revoked · Strict liability
- Use of ships, aircraft and vehicles: restricted goods article 6(3) · Revoked · Strict liability
- Use of ships, aircraft and vehicles: restricted goods article 6(3)(c) · Revoked · Strict liability
- Customs powers to demand evidence of destination which goods reach article 7 · Revoked · Strict liability
- Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence granted by the Governor under this Order and who… article 8 · Revoked · Mixed — some elements strict, some not
- If, for the purposes of obtaining any licence under this Order, any person makes any statement or furnishes any… article 8(1) · Revoked · Requires proof of a state of mind
- Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence granted by the Governor under this Order and who… article 8(2) · Revoked · Strict liability
- Declaration as to goods: power of search article 9(3) · Revoked · Strict liability
- Declaration as to goods: power of search article 9(4) · Revoked · Requires proof of a state of mind
- Any person who – a without reasonable excuse, refuses or fails within the time and in the manner specified (or, if no… paragraph 5 of SCHEDULE 4 · Revoked · Requires proof of a state of mind
What Parliament said about it
Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2006