Offences in connection with applications for licences, conditions attaching to licences, etc

article 8(1) of The Uzbekistan (Restrictive Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2006

• Revoked
• Requires proof of a state of mind
• Either way
• International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions

The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.

What the provision says

1 If, for the purposes of obtaining any licence under this Order, any person makes any statement or furnishes any document or information which to his knowledge is false in

a material particular, or recklessly makes any statement or furnishes any document or information which is false in

a material particular, he shall be guilty of an offence under this Order.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds

a person

Conduct

making a false or misleading statement

Fault element

Requires proof of a state of mind

Burden of proof

No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (recklessly).

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: recklessly.

What would breach article 8(1)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

1. Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Uzbekistan (Restrictive Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2006.
2. Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
3. Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.

Penalty

Mode of trial

Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court

Maximum fine

£5,000

Maximum prison (summary)

6 months

Maximum prison (on indictment)

2 years

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

• Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant All courts in England and Wales

  How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.

• Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014

  Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.

• Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline All courts in England and Wales

  When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.

• Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017

  The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.

• General guideline: overarching principles All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019

  The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.

• Totality: definitive guideline All courts in England and Wales

  How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status

Revoked

Revoked by

The Uzbekistan (Restrictive Measures) (Overseas Territories) (Revocation) Order 2010

Revoked on

8 April 2010

Made

14 February 2006

In force from

16 February 2006

Extent

Not stated

How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

This Order applies to each of the British overseas territories listed in Schedule 1. It gives effect in these overseas territories to Council Common Position 2005/792/CFSP adopted by the Council of the European Union on 14th November 2005 which prohibits (a) the delivery or supply of arms and related material to Uzbekistan, from Members States' territories, by their nationals, or using their flagged vessels and aircraft; (b) the provision of technical assistance, brokering services and other services related to military activities and to the provision, manufacture, maintenance and use of arms and related material to any person, entity or body in, or for use in Uzbekistan; and (c) the provision of financing or financial assistance related to military activities to any person, entity or body, in or for use in, Uzbekistan.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

• Provisions supplementary to articles 10 to 12article 13(3)
• Supply of restricted goodsarticle 3(1)
• Exportation of restricted goods to Uzbekistanarticle 4(3)
• Provision of assistance, advice or training related to military activitiesarticle 5
• Use of ships, aircraft and vehicles: restricted goodsarticle 6(3)
• Use of ships, aircraft and vehicles: restricted goodsarticle 6(3)(c)
• Customs powers to demand evidence of destination which goods reacharticle 7
• Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence granted by the Governor under this Order…article 8
• Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence granted by the Governor under this Order…article 8(2)
• Declaration as to goods: power of searcharticle 9(3)
• Declaration as to goods: power of searcharticle 9(4)
• Any person who – a without reasonable excuse, refuses or fails within the time and in the manner specified…paragraph 5 of SCHEDULE 4

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis

the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”

Confidence

0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source

• This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
• The Uzbekistan (Restrictive Measures) (Overseas Territories) Order 2006 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
• International sanctions, export control and trade restrictionsOther offences on the same subject
• Offences created in 2006