Transitional arrangements
regulation 8 of The Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2008
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
8 In respect of any contravention before
1 January 2010, no person commits an offence under regulation 5(a) consisting of
a contravention of regulation 3(1)(a) where the action that would otherwise constitute the offence consists of selling
a medical food whose composition fails to comply with Article
3 of the Directive as read with the row relating to manganese set out in the second part of Table 1 (minerals) in the Annex to the Directive as it stood before it was amended by Commission Directive 2006/141/EC on infant formulae and follow-on formulae and amending Directive 1999/21.EC.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- selling or supplying something the instrument restricts
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 8?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Selling the goods under the Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2008 where the instrument prohibits the sale outright.
- Supplying without carrying out a check the instrument requires first, even where the sale would otherwise be lawful.
- Offering for sale counts as well as selling: displaying stock is enough where the provision reaches an offer.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 1 October 2008
- In force from
- 29 October 2008
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations, which apply in relation to Wales, make the legislative provisions described in paragraph 2 which are considered necessary to give effect to the judgment in the High Court of Justice in the case called R v. the Secretary of State for Health and the Welsh Ministers on the application of the Infant and Dietetics Food Association Limited (action number CO/230/2008). Judgment was delivered on 29 February 2008. Following that judgment, the High Court granted a declaration that the Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Wales) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/3573 (W.316) fail to comply with Commission Directive 2006/141/EC on infant formulae and follow-on formulae and amending Directive 1999/21/EC (OJ No. L401, 30.12.2006, p.1) to the extent that they prohibit as from 11 January 2008 (instead of as from 31 December 2009) trade in infant formula and follow-on formula whose labelling satisfies the labelling requirements of the Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula Regulations 1995 (S.I. 1995/77) but does not satisfy the labelling requirements of the Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Wales) Regulations 2007. These Regulations amend the Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Wales) Regulations 2007 to— revise the list of regulations that have to be complied with if a person is to market infant formula or follow-on formula (regulation 2(2)); provide that the presentation of infant formula and follow-on formula must comply with the provisions of specified regulations (regulation 2(3)); revise the list of regulations that have to be complied with if a person is to export infant formula to third countries (regulation 2(4)); revise the list of regulations that have to be complied with if a person is to export follow-on formula to third countries (regulation 2(5)); and create transitional arrangements that apply to the enforcement of— the labelling requirements for infant formula and follow-on formula, and the requirements that apply in relation to the shape, appearance and packaging of infant formula and follow-on formula (regulation 2(6)). These Regulations also provide transitional arrangements with regard to the Medical Food (Wales) Regulations 2000 (S.I. 2000/1866 (W.125)). A full impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- For paragraph (3) of regulation 31 (revocation and transitional arrangements) there is substituted the…regulation 2(6)
- the following regulation— Transitional arrangements 8 In respect of any contravention before 1 January 2010,…regulation 3(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”; c10_offence_under_parent_act
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Infant Formula and Follow-on Formula (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2008 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted salesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2008