1 Where cattle are exported to third countries the keeper must send the cattle passports to the National…
paragraph 13(1) of SCHEDULE 3 of The Cattle Identification (Wales) Regulations 2007
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Dogs, animals, hunting and wildlife
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 Where cattle are exported to third countries the keeper must send the cattle passports to the National Assembly within seven days, and failure to do so is an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a keeper
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a keeper meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach paragraph 13(1) of SCHEDULE 3?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the Cattle Identification (Wales) Regulations 2007, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 13 March 2007
- In force from
- 6 April 2007
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations revoke and remake insofar as they apply in relation to Wales the provisions of— a the Bovine Animals (Records, Identification and Movement) Order 1995; b the Cattle Identification Regulations 1998; c the Cattle Database Regulations 1998; d the Cattle (Identification of Older Animals) (Wales) Regulations 2000. together with the amendments to those instruments. The principal changes are as follows. The Regulations now allow bison to be tagged up to 9 months after birth (paragraph 1(3) of Schedule 1). They create an offence of transferring eartags between animals (paragraph 4(5) of Schedule 1). They no longer permit the use of temporary calf passports. They permit electronic registration of cattle (paragraph 2(3) of Schedule 2). They change the £50 fee for replacement passports to a fee reflecting the cost of issue (paragraph 4 of Schedule 3). They simplify the provisions on records (Schedule 5). The Regulations enforce— Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council (establishing a system for the identification and registration of bovine animals and regarding the labelling of beef products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 820/97); Commission Regulation (EC) No. 494/98 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No. 820/97 as regards the application of minimum administrative sanctions in the framework of the system for the identification and registration of bovine animals; Commission Regulation (EC) No. 911/2004 (implementing Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards ear tags, passports and holding registers);and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 644/2005 (authorising a special identification system for bovine animals kept for cultural and historical purposes on approved premises as provided for in Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council). They provide for notification of a holding to the National Assembly if cattle are kept there (regulation 3). They make provision for eartags (regulation 4 and Schedule 1), registration of cattle (regulation 5 and Schedule 2), passports (regulation 6 and Schedule 3) and notification of movement and death (regulation 7 and Schedule 4). They provide for records to be kept in the form specified in Schedule 5. They provide for the enforcement of the Regulations (Part 4). They are enforced by the local authority (regulation 16). Breach of the Regulations is an offence, punishable— a on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment not exceeding three months or to both; b on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to both. A full regulatory appraisal of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available from the National Assembly for Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff CF10 3NQ.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Registrationparagraph 1 of SCHEDULE 2
- Making a recordparagraph 1(1) of SCHEDULE 5
- Enforcement of Article 4 of Regulation (EC) No. 1760/2000paragraph 1(4) of SCHEDULE 1
- Alteration and storage of ear tagsparagraph 10(1) of SCHEDULE 1
- Alteration and storage of ear tagsparagraph 10(2) of SCHEDULE 1
- Imported cattleparagraph 12(2) of SCHEDULE 3
- Exportsparagraph 13(2) of SCHEDULE 3
- Markets and animal gatheringsparagraph 14(1) of SCHEDULE 3
- Provision of informationparagraph 2 of SCHEDULE 5
- Retention of cattle passportsparagraph 2(2) of SCHEDULE 3
- Movement from a holdingparagraph 3(1) of SCHEDULE 1
- Movement from a holdingparagraph 3(2) of SCHEDULE 1
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.88.
- Basis
- the provision says the conduct “is an offence”; the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
- Confidence
- 0.88 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Cattle Identification (Wales) Regulations 2007 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Dogs, animals, hunting and wildlifeOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2007