17 An intermediary agency that discloses information in contravention of regulation 7 without reasonable…
regulation 17 of The Adoption Information and Intermediary Services (Pre-Commencement Adoptions) (Wales) Regulations 2005
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Education, social security, pensions and public services
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
17 An intermediary agency that discloses information in contravention of regulation
7 without reasonable excuse is guilty of an offence and is liable on conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
that discloses information in contravention of regulation 7 without reasonable excuse is guilty of an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
What would breach regulation 17?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Adoption Information and Intermediary Services (Pre-Commencement Adoptions) (Wales) Regulations 2005, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2005-12-30); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 27 September 2005
- In force from
- 30 December 2005
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make provision under section 98 of the Adoption and Children Act 2002 (“the Act”) for the purposes of assisting persons adopted before 30 December 2005 to obtain information about their adoption and to facilitate contact between those persons and their birth relatives through an intermediary service. The regime for disclosure of information about adoptions after 30 December 2005 is set out in sections 56 to 65 of the Act. An adoption agency dealing merely with a request for information about an adoption for which it was the adoption agency involved will continue to deal with it under the Adoption Agencies Regulations 1983. Part 1 confers new functions on registered adoption support agencies and adoption agencies (“intermediary agencies”) that are willing to provide an intermediary service in respect of adoptions before 30 December 2005. Part 2 deals generally with applications for an intermediary service. An intermediary agency may receive an application for an intermediary service from an adopted person or a relative of an adopted person. Applications in respect of adoptions after 12 November 1975 may be accepted but priority must be given to applications in relation to adoptions before that date. The intermediary agency is not required to proceed with an application where it does not consider that it would be appropriate. Regulation 6 sets out the factors that the intermediary agency should take into account in making that decision. Regulation 7 requires the intermediary agency to obtain the informed consent of the subject of the application before disclosing information that would identify the person to the applicant or enable the person to be traced. Regulation 8 enables the adopted person to register a veto with the appropriate adoption agency in relation to an application under these Regulations. Regulation 10 requires the intermediary agency to provide information about counselling and to secure counselling services in relation to applications for intermediary services. Intermediary agencies must themselves provide support and assistance to a person who is the subject of an application if the person chooses not to pay for a counselling service. Part 3 sets out the procedure to be followed by the intermediary agency in processing an application. The first steps include confirming the age and identity of the applicant and establishing that he is related to the subject. The intermediary agency should then identify the adoption agency that holds the records relating to the adoption, seeking assistance where appropriate from the Registrar General and the court. It should then contact that agency to find out if a veto has been registered and to seek its views on the application and to seek such information as may be necessary to trace the subject of the application (regulation 12). Where no adoption agency was involved, the intermediary agency may seek such information from the Registrar General as may assist in processing the application (regulation 13). Regulation 14 and 15 require the Registrar General and the court to provide information when requested. Regulation 16 authorises certain disclosures for the purpose of processing an application under these Regulations. Part 5 deals with miscellaneous matters. Regulation 17 creates an offence of disclosure of information in contravention of regulation 8. Regulation 18 provides for fees that may be charged by intermediary agencies, adoption agencies and the Registrar General in relation to applications under these Regulations.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Adoption Information and Intermediary Services (Pre-Commencement Adoptions) (Wales) Regulations 2005 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Education, social security, pensions and public servicesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2005