UK Offence Report

Amendments to the Criminal Procedure Rules 2014

article 7(e) of The Criminal Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2015

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

e after rule 37.8, insert— Single justice procedure: special rules 37.9 1 This rule applies where— a the offence alleged— i can be tried only in a magistrates’ court, and ii is not one punishable with imprisonment; b the defendant is at least 18 years old; c the prosecutor has served on the defendant— i a written charge, ii the material listed in paragraph (2) on which the prosecutor relies to set out the facts of the offence, iii the material listed in paragraph (3) on which the prosecutor relies to provide the court with information relevant to sentence, iv a notice that the procedure set out in this rule applies, v a notice for the defendant’s use if the defendant wants to plead guilty, vi a notice for the defendant’s use if the defendant wants to plead guilty but wants the case dealt with at a hearing by a court comprising more than one justice, and vii a notice for the defendant’s use if the defendant wants to plead not guilty; and d the prosecutor has served on the court officer— i copies of those documents, and ii a certificate of service of those documents on the defendant.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
an court officer
Conduct
dealing with funds or making them available in breach of sanctions
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an court officer meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach article 7(e)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Moving, converting or paying away funds that belong to a designated person under the Criminal Procedure (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2015, without a licence from the Treasury.
  2. Making funds or economic resources available to a designated person - which includes paying a third party who will pass on the benefit.
  3. Dealing with an asset in ignorance of the designation is still caught where the provision imposes no knowledge requirement; check the fault element stated below before assuming otherwise.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
9 March 2015
In force from
6 April 2015
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Rules) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Rules amend the Criminal Procedure Rules 2014, S.I. 2014/1610, as follows: Rule Amendment Part 37 A new rule 37.9 (Single justice procedure: special rules) is inserted in order to supplement sections 46 to 50 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 (trial by single justice on the papers). Rule 37.8 (Written guilty plea: special rules), which supplements section 12 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, is amended so as to make the expression of the new and existing rules correspond. Rules 37.1, 37.2 and 37.3 are amended, rules 37.9 to 37.16 are renumbered as rules 37.10 to 37.17 and amended, and rule 37.17 is renumbered as rule 37.18, in consequence of the 2015 Act and the other rule changes. Part 3 Rule 3.9 is amended in consequence. Part 4 Rule 4.7 is amended in consequence. Part 7 Rules 7.1, 7.2 and 7.4 are amended in consequence. Part 9 Rules 9.9, 9.11 and 9.13 are amended in consequence. Part 42 Rules 42.1 and 42.4 are amended in consequence. These Rules come into force on 6th April 2015.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.60.

Basis
the provision says the conduct is “punishable”
Confidence
0.60 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source