Information for purpose of landing charges
article 18(6) of The Lymington Harbour Revision Order 2014
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Summary only
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
6 A persons who without reasonable excuse fails to comply with
a requirement made under paragraph (1), or who in compliance with such
a requirement provides information which he knows to be false, or recklessly provides information which is false in
a material particular, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
4 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (recklessly).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: recklessly; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
6 A persons who without reasonable excuse fails to comply with a requirement made under paragraph (1), or who in compliance with such a requirement provides information which he knows to be false, or recklessly provides information which is false in a material particular, shall be guilty of an offenc
What would breach article 18(6)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person in compliance with such a requirement provides information which he knows to be false, or recklessly provides information which is false in a material particular.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Lymington Harbour Revision Order 2014.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £2,500
- Standard scale
- Level 4
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 24 April 2014
- In force from
- 23 May 2014
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order— a defines the limits of Lymington Harbour (article 3); b in Part 2 confers on the Lymington Harbour Commissioners (“the Commissioners”) and their Harbour Master (defined in article 2) powers of direction for the regulation and management of the harbour; c provides in Part 3 for the licensing of operators of harbour water taxi services (defined in article 2); d confers on the Commissioners powers in respect of harbour services and facilities (article 16); e establishes the conditions for a duly authorised officer of the Commissioners to board a vessel for certain purposes (article 17); f enables the Commissioners to require the master or owner of a vessel embarking or disembarking passengers or loading or unloading goods to furnish information required for the imposition of landing fees and charges (article 18); and g alters the method of calculating the limit of the amount of the Commissioners’ reserve fund (article 22) and their temporary borrowing powers (article 23). Article 19 creates an offence of intentionally obstructing or threatening, or without reasonable excuse failing to give information to, the Harbour Master or a member of his staff acting in performance of his functions or of giving false information to such an officer, for which the penalty on summary conviction of any such offence is a fine not exceeding level 4 on the standard scale. A full assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on business or the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen. The harbour map (defined in article 3(4)) may be inspected during working hours at the principal office of the Commissioners at the Harbour Office, Bath Road, Lymington SO41 3SE.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Restriction of harbour water taxis servicesarticle 11(2)
- Obstruction of officersarticle 19(1)
- Obstruction of officersarticle 19(2)
- Failure to comply with directionsarticle 8(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Lymington Harbour Revision Order 2014 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harboursOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2014