Penalties for non-compliance by members of qualifying partnership
regulation 15(1) of The Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 If, in respect of
a financial year of
a qualifying partnership, the requirements of paragraph (1) of regulation
4 are not complied with within the period referred to in paragraph (3) of that regulation, every person who was
a member of the partnership or
a director of such
a member at the end of that year is liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 15(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2008-04-06); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 26 February 2008
- In force from
- 6 April 2008
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations are made under section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 and sections 1210(1)(h) and 1292(2) of the Companies Act 2006. They replace the provisions of the Partnerships and Unlimited Companies (Accounts) Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1820) (“the 1993 Regulations”) and of the Partnerships and Unlimited Companies (Accounts) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1994 (S.R. 1994/133) (“the 1994 Regulations”) relating to certain partnerships. The provisions of the 1993 Regulations and the 1994 Regulations relating to unlimited companies are now contained in Part 15 of the Companies Act 2006 and regulations made under it. The Regulations continue the implementation of Council Directive 90/605/EEC (O.J. L317, 16.11.1990, p.60) amending Directive 78/660/EEC on annual accounts (O.J. L222, 14.8.1978, p.11) and Directive 83/349/EEC on consolidated accounts (O.J. L193, 18.7.1983, p.1). They also implement, in part, Directive 2006/43/EC on statutory audits of annual accounts and consolidated accounts (O.J. L157, 9.6.2006, p.87) (“the Audit Directive”). The Regulations come into force on 6th April 2008 and apply to financial years of qualifying partnerships beginning on or after that date, and auditors appointed in respect of those financial years (regulation 1(2)). Regulation 3 re-enacts the scope of application of the 1993 and 1994 Regulations as being, in effect, partnerships and limited partnerships all of whose members have limited liability. Regulation 4 re-enacts the requirements of the 1993 and 1994 Regulations that qualifying partnerships prepare such accounts and directors’ report, and cause to be prepared such an auditor’s report, as would be required if the partnership were a company. In addition, the notes to the accounts must contain information about the remuneration of the auditors in implementation of Article 49 of the Audit Directive (regulation 4(2)). The accounts must be prepared within the period of 9 months from the end of the relevant financial year, which is a reduction of the period for such preparation from 10 months as provided for in the 1993 and 1994 Regulations. This reflects the new time limit in section 442(2)(a) of the Companies Act 2006. The Schedule to the Regulations makes certain modifications to the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and of the regulations made under it which are applied by the Regulations. Regulations 5 and 6 re-enact the provisions of the 1993 and 1994 Regulations relating to the delivery of such accounts to the registrar of companies and for their publication at the head offices in the United Kingdom of a qualifying partnership. Regulation 7 re-enacts an exemption in the 1993 and 1994 Regulations from compliance with regulations 4, 5 and 6 where the partnership has been dealt with in consolidated group accounts prepared by a member of the partnership (or the parent of such a member) established under the law of a member State by the method of full or proportional consolidation or the equity method of accounting. Regulation 8 requires the auditor’s appointment to be made by the qualifying partnership’s members in implementation of Article 37 of the Audit Directive. Regulation 9 sets out the auditor’s functions, and regulation 10 applies the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 regarding signature of the auditor’s report in implementation of Article 28.1 of the Audit Directive. Regulation 11 provides for an application to be made to court for relief in cases where an auditor is removed from office on improper grounds in implementation of Article 38.1 of the Audit Directive. Regulations 12 and 13 require notification of the relevant supervisory body where an auditor ceases to hold office before the end of his term of office implementing Article 38.2 of the Audit Directive. Regulation 14 prescribes an audit of a qualifying partnership as a statutory audit for the purposes of section 1210(1)(h) of the Companies Act 2006. Regulation 15 re-enacts the penalties for a qualifying partnership’s failure to comply with the Regulations and regulation 16 provides the penalty for an auditor’s failure to comply with regulation 12. Regulation 17 contains consequential amendments. Regulation 18 revokes the 1993 and 1994 Regulations and makes transitional provision for the continued application of those regulations after revocation in respect of financial years beginning before 6th April 2008. A transposition note has been prepared which sets out how Directive 2006/43 is to be transposed into UK law. An Impact Assessment of the effect that the implementation of Directive 2006/43 will have on the costs of business, charities or voluntary bodies has also been prepared. Both are available from the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, Corporate Law and Governance Directorate, 1 Victoria Street, London, SW1H 0ET. They are also available electronically at www.berr.gov.uk. Copies have also been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament. Otherwise, an Impact Assessment has not been produced for these Regulations as they have only a negligible impact on the costs of business, charities or voluntary bodies.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Large and Medium-sized Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008
Lords · 2 July 2008 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Baroness Vadera)
I beg to move the Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper. Moved, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Large and Medium-sized Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008. 22nd r eport from the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments.—(Baroness Vadera.) On Question, Motion agreed to.
-
Small Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008
Lords · 2 July 2008 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (Baroness Vadera)
rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Small Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008. The noble Baroness said: We are considering three sets of draft regulations to be made under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000: the Limited Liability Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) (Application Of Companies) Act 2006 Regulations 2008; the Small…
-
Companies and Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) Regulations 2013
Lords · 17 July 2013 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (Viscount Younger of Leckie)
My Lords, I beg to move that this Committee considers the following three statutory instruments, which I will speak to in turn: first, the Companies and Partnerships (Accounts and Audit) Regulations 2013; secondly, the Companies Act 2006 (Strategic Reports and Directors’ Report) Regulations 2013; and, thirdly, the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013. With…
-
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill (Sixteenth sitting)
Commons · 22 November 2022 · Kevin Hollinrake
I have nothing further to add. Question put and agreed to. New clause 10 accordingly read a Second time, and added to the Bill. New Clause 11 Power to amend disqualification legislation in relation to relevant entities: NI “(1) The Company Directors Disqualification (Northern Ireland) Order 2002 (S.I. 2002/3150 (N.I. 4)) is amended as follows. (2) In Article 2(2) (interpretation), for the definition of…
Other offences in the same instrument
- Penalties for non-compliance by members of qualifying partnershipregulation 15(2)
- Penalties for non-compliance by members of qualifying partnershipregulation 15(3)
- Penalties for non-compliance by auditors of qualifying partnershipsregulation 16(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.72.
- Basis
- the provision states liability on summary conviction
- Confidence
- 0.72 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Partnerships (Accounts) Regulations 2008 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2008