UK Offence Report

Requirement to carry and produce evidence of CPC or of training exemption in vehicle

regulation 14(c) of The Vehicle Drivers (Certificates of Professional Competence) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2008

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

c for paragraph (5) substitute—

5 Subject to paragraph (5A),

a person to whom regulation 4(5) applies who does not carry an NVT certificate with him in the relevant vehicle which he is driving is guilty of an offence. , and

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
breaching the provision
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach regulation 14(c)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. On these words an offence is committed where a person does not carry an NVT certificate with him in the relevant vehicle which he is driving.
  2. Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Vehicle Drivers (Certificates of Professional Competence) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2008.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
Maximum fine
£1,000
Standard scale
Level 3
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
21 July 2008
In force from
1 September 2008
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations amend the Motor Vehicles (Access to Driver Licensing Records) Regulations 2001 (“the 2001 Regulations”) and the Vehicle Drivers (Certificates of Professional Competence) Regulations 2007 (“the 2007 Regulations”). The 2007 Regulations implemented Directive 2003/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15th July 2003 on the initial qualification and periodic training of drivers of certain road vehicles for the carriage of goods or passengers, amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 and Council Directive 91/439/EEC and repealing Council Directive 76/914/EEC (OJ No. L226, 10.9.2003, p.4), as amended by Directive 2004/66/EC (OJ No. L168, 1.10.2004, p.35), and Directive 2006/103/EC (OJ No. L 363, 20.12.2006, p.344). These Regulations make further provision in relation to matters arising out of, or related to, the obligations in that Directive. The 2001 Regulations are made under section 71 of the Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000 and determine the purposes for which information held under Part 3 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 (driver licensing) may be given to the National Policing Improvement Agency. Regulation 2 of these Regulations amends regulation 2 (purposes for which access may be given) of the 2001 Regulations to add the prevention, investigation and prosecution of a contravention of a provision of the 2007 Regulations as one of those purposes. Under regulation 4 (persons who must take the initial CPC test) of the 2007 Regulations, subject to certain exceptions, a person to whom the regulations apply is not permitted to drive a relevant vehicle on a road on or after a specified date unless he has successfully completed the initial CPC test. One exception is where a person is undergoing a vocational training course and the competent authority has issued that person with an NVT certificate (regulation 4(5)). Regulation 5 of these Regulations amends regulation 4 of the 2007 Regulations to make provision for applying to the competent authority for an NVT certificate, including the charging of a fee of £25. Regulation 5 (initial CPC test) of the 2007 Regulations makes provision for the organisation of the initial CPC test by the competent authority or by a person approved by it. The initial CPC test includes a theoretical test and a practical test. Regulation 6 of these Regulations amends regulation 5 so as to— a require the theoretical test to be taken before the practical test and require the practical test to be passed not more than 24 months after passing the theoretical test; b make provision for the payment of a fee by an approved person for the tests which it conducts; c increase the fee for a practical test conducted by a competent authority during normal working hours from £41 to £55; and d increase the fee for a practical test conducted by a competent authority out of normal working hours from £41 to £63. A person submitting himself for a theoretical test, a practical test or a periodic training course is to produce to the person conducting the test or course an appropriate licence or other evidence of his identity (new regulation 5A inserted by regulation 7 and regulation 8(c) of these Regulations). Under regulation 6 (persons providing periodic training courses) of the 2007 Regulations, a person who wishes to provide periodic training courses must make a written application to the competent authority for approval. Regulation 8(a) amends regulation 6(5) to allow the competent authority to withdraw or suspend an approval of a person or a course which it has approved in error. Regulation 8(b) amends regulation 6 of the 2007 Regulations so as to provide that periodic training courses can be taken by nationals of member States who work in the United Kingdom as well as those who normally reside there. Regulation 9 inserts a new regulation 6A (appeals) which provides for appeals to be made to the Transport Tribunal against certain decisions of the Secretary of State under the 2007 Regulations. A person approved under regulation 6(3)(a) of the 2007 Regulations to provide periodic training courses has to the notify the competent authority each time a person to whom it has provided training completes a periodic training course and to pay a fee upon each notification (regulation 7(1) of the 2007 Regulations). Regulation 10 changes the basis for calculating the fee. Regulation 11 amends regulation 8 (driver qualification card) of the 2007 Regulations to place a requirement on the competent authority to issue a driver qualification to certain persons and to remove the requirement for those persons to pay a fee for the card. Regulation 12 inserts new regulation 8A to permit certain other persons to apply for a driver qualification card on payment of a fee of £25. Regulation 12 also inserts new regulation 8B which deals with damaged, lost and stolen documents. The holder of a driver qualification card or an NVT certificate is required to notify the competent authority if the document is damaged, lost or stolen (regulation 8B(1)). Failure to do so is an offence punishable on summary conviction by a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale (regulation 8B(5) and (6)). Regulation 8B(3) requires the payment of a fee of £25 for a replacement driver qualification card or a replacement NVT certificate. Regulations 14 to 16 amend regulations 11 (requirement to carry and produce evidence of CPC or of training exemption in vehicle), 12 (document errors) and 13 (forgery and false statements) of the 2007 Regulations in consequence of the amendments made by regulations 11 and 12. Regulation 11 of the 2007 Regulations is amended so that a person who has notified the competent authority that his driver qualification card or NVT certificate has been damaged, lost or stolen and paid the fee for a replacement does not commit an offence under regulation 11 (regulation 14(d)). A full impact assessment of the effect that these Regulations will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available from the Driving Standards Agency, Policy Branch, The Axis, Upper Parliament Street, Nottingham NG1 6LP and on the Driving Standards Agency’s website at www.dsa.gov.uk. The impact assessment is annexed to the explanatory memorandum which is available alongside the instrument on the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi. gov.uk.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source