Confidential information
article 6(5) of The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
5 A person who contravenes the prohibition in paragraph (2) is guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 6(5)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person contravenes the prohibition in paragraph (2).
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- 6 months
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 1 year
the level is stated but no money value is given: this instrument extends outside the United Kingdom, where the standard scale set by s.122(1) of the Sentencing Act 2020 does not run.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
The Ministry of Justice records offences under this instrument against offence code 6678 — 06678 - Not under authority of a licence dealing with funds or economic resources belonging to or owned or held by an A.7(2) person (Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006). That code may cover several provisions of the instrument, so a count against it is not a count of prosecutions under this provision alone.
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have their own code in the MoJ’s Outcomes by Offence data tool. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 10 October 2006
- In force from
- 12 October 2006
- Extent
- E+W+S+NI
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order, made under section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946, gives effect in the United Kingdom to Resolution 1373(2001) adopted by the Security Council of the United Nations on 28th September 2001 relating to terrorism and resolution 1453(2002) adopted on 20th December 2002 relating to humanitarian exemptions. It also provides for enforcement of Regulation (EC) 2580/2001 on specific measures directed at certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (“the EC Regulation”). The EC Regulation provides a mechanism for designating within the Community persons in respect of whom measures contained in the EC Regulation are to apply. The measures include the freezing of funds, financial assets and economic resources of such persons and ensuring that any funds, financial assets, economic resources and financial services are not made available to them. Article 3 of this Order provides that “designated persons” are persons named in Council Decision 2006/379/EC (which provides the designations for the purposes of the EC Regulation) and those identified in a direction given by the Treasury under article 4. Article 4 gives the Treasury power to give a direction to designate a person for the purposes of the Order if one of a number of specified conditions is fulfilled in respect of the person. The conditions are that the Treasury have reasonable grounds to suspect that the person is or may be (a) a person who commits, attempts to commit, participates in or facilitates the commission of acts of terrorism; (b) a person named in the Council Decision; (c) a person owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a designated person; or (d) a person acting on behalf of or at the direction of a designated person. This article also gives power for the Treasury to specify in the direction that the prohibition in article 8(1) does not apply in respect of the person identified in the direction. Article 5 makes further provision about the Treasury’s directions, including a requirement for the Treasury to take the steps that they consider appropriate, to publicise the direction or to inform only certain persons and to notify the person identified in the direction. This article also includes provision about the manner in which a direction has effect and appeals. Article 6 gives the Treasury power to specify that information contained in the direction is to be treated as confidential. The article imposes a prohibition on disclosing such information except with lawful authority. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition and provides that the Court may grant an injunction to prevent a breach. Article 7 prohibits any dealing with funds, financial assets and economic resources of anyone who commits, attempts to commit, participates in or facilitates the commission of acts of terrorism; designated persons; anyone owned or controlled by them or anyone acting on their behalf of or at their direction. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition. Article 8 prohibits making funds, financial assets, economic resources or financial services available to anyone in respect of whom article 7 applies. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition. Article 10 makes it a criminal offence to circumvent the prohibitions or to facilitate the commission of an offence relating to a prohibition. Article 11 provides a licensing procedure to enable, for humanitarian and other purposes, certain acts to be exempted from the prohibitions. Article 16 gives the Treasury power to delegate its functions under the Order. Article 18 confirms that the provisions of this Order apply to the Crown but, in the event of a contravention, the Crown is not criminally liable. Article 20 revokes the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2001, save that in any case where a direction has been made under article 4 of that Order, the provisions of that Order continue to apply. Other instruments and provisions amending the 2001 Order are also revoked. The 2001 Order provided for enforcement of the EC Regulation and gave a power for a domestic asset freeze. Schedule 1 makes provisions about information and evidence. Schedule 2 lists the provisions revoked by virtue of article 20. A partial regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business may be attained from the Asset Freezing Unit of the Financial Crime Team, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ and is also available on HM Treasury’s website (www.hm-treasury.gov.uk). A copy of the regulatory impact assessment has been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill
Lords · 9 February 2010 · Lord Myners
My Lords, this has been a stimulating debate, one that I approached with considerable trepidation given the contribution we could expect from Members of the House with great experience in matters of the law. As the whole House recognises, the threat to the UK today from international terrorism is very real and significant. Terrorists need financing to be able to carry out attacks, the costs of which, as we have…
-
Terrorism: Finance
Lords · 6 April 2010 · The Financial Services Secretary to the Treasury (Lord Myners)
My honourable friend the Exchequer Secretary has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. In a Written Ministerial Statement on 10 October 2006, the then Economic Secretary undertook to report to Parliament on a quarterly basis on the operation of the UK’s counterterrorism asset-freezing regime. This is the 14th of these reports and covers the period January to March 2010. 1 Asset-freezing designations In…
-
Counter-Terrorist Asset-Freezing Regime (January to March 2010)
Commons · 6 April 2010 · The Exchequer Secretary to the Treasury (Sarah McCarthy-Fry)
In a written ministerial statement on 10 October 2006, Official Report, column 11WS, the then Economic Secretary, my right hon. Friend the Member for Normanton (Ed Balls), undertook to report to Parliament on a quarterly basis on the operation of the UK’s counter-terrorism asset-freezing regime. This is the 14th of these reports and covers the period January to March 2010 1. Asset-freezing designations In the…
-
Counter-Terrorist Asset Freezing Regime
Commons · 13 July 2012 · The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Mr Mark Hoban)
Under the Terrorist Asset-Freezing etc. Act 2010 (“TAFA 2010”), the Treasury is required to report quarterly to Parliament on its operation of the UK’s asset-freezing regime mandated by UN Security Council Resolution 1373. This is the sixth report under the Act and it covers the period from 1 April to 30 June 2012. This report also covers the UK implementation of the UN al-Qaeda asset-freezing regime and the…
Other offences in the same instrument
- Circumventing prohibitions etcarticle 10
- Licencesarticle 11(5)
- Licencesarticle 11(6)
- Freezing funds and economic resources of designated personsarticle 7(3)
- A relevant institution that fails to comply with a requirement in paragraph (1) or (2) is guilty of an offenceparagraph 2(3) of SCHEDULE 1
- A person is guilty of an offence if he— a without reasonable excuse refuses or fails within the time and in…paragraph 4 of SCHEDULE 1
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictionsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2006