UK Offence Report

6 Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence and who fails to comply with any…

article 11(6) of The Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

6 Any person who has done any act under the authority of

a licence and who fails to comply with any conditions attaching to that licence is guilty of an offence.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
failing to do something the instrument requires
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach article 11(6)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. On these words an offence is committed where a person has done any act under the authority of a licence and who fails to comply with any conditions attaching to that licence.
  2. Not doing what the provision requires under the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006, by the time it requires it to be done.
  3. Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
Maximum fine
Not determined
Standard scale
Level 5
Maximum prison (summary)
6 months
Maximum prison (on indictment)
1 year

the level is stated but no money value is given: this instrument extends outside the United Kingdom, where the standard scale set by s.122(1) of the Sentencing Act 2020 does not run.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

The Ministry of Justice records offences under this instrument against offence code 6678 — 06678 - Not under authority of a licence dealing with funds or economic resources belonging to or owned or held by an A.7(2) person (Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2006). That code may cover several provisions of the instrument, so a count against it is not a count of prosecutions under this provision alone.

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have their own code in the MoJ’s Outcomes by Offence data tool. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
10 October 2006
In force from
12 October 2006
Extent
E+W+S+NI

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

This Order, made under section 1 of the United Nations Act 1946, gives effect in the United Kingdom to Resolution 1373(2001) adopted by the Security Council of the United Nations on 28th September 2001 relating to terrorism and resolution 1453(2002) adopted on 20th December 2002 relating to humanitarian exemptions. It also provides for enforcement of Regulation (EC) 2580/2001 on specific measures directed at certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (“the EC Regulation”). The EC Regulation provides a mechanism for designating within the Community persons in respect of whom measures contained in the EC Regulation are to apply. The measures include the freezing of funds, financial assets and economic resources of such persons and ensuring that any funds, financial assets, economic resources and financial services are not made available to them. Article 3 of this Order provides that “designated persons” are persons named in Council Decision 2006/379/EC (which provides the designations for the purposes of the EC Regulation) and those identified in a direction given by the Treasury under article 4. Article 4 gives the Treasury power to give a direction to designate a person for the purposes of the Order if one of a number of specified conditions is fulfilled in respect of the person. The conditions are that the Treasury have reasonable grounds to suspect that the person is or may be (a) a person who commits, attempts to commit, participates in or facilitates the commission of acts of terrorism; (b) a person named in the Council Decision; (c) a person owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by a designated person; or (d) a person acting on behalf of or at the direction of a designated person. This article also gives power for the Treasury to specify in the direction that the prohibition in article 8(1) does not apply in respect of the person identified in the direction. Article 5 makes further provision about the Treasury’s directions, including a requirement for the Treasury to take the steps that they consider appropriate, to publicise the direction or to inform only certain persons and to notify the person identified in the direction. This article also includes provision about the manner in which a direction has effect and appeals. Article 6 gives the Treasury power to specify that information contained in the direction is to be treated as confidential. The article imposes a prohibition on disclosing such information except with lawful authority. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition and provides that the Court may grant an injunction to prevent a breach. Article 7 prohibits any dealing with funds, financial assets and economic resources of anyone who commits, attempts to commit, participates in or facilitates the commission of acts of terrorism; designated persons; anyone owned or controlled by them or anyone acting on their behalf of or at their direction. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition. Article 8 prohibits making funds, financial assets, economic resources or financial services available to anyone in respect of whom article 7 applies. The article makes it a criminal offence to contravene this prohibition. Article 10 makes it a criminal offence to circumvent the prohibitions or to facilitate the commission of an offence relating to a prohibition. Article 11 provides a licensing procedure to enable, for humanitarian and other purposes, certain acts to be exempted from the prohibitions. Article 16 gives the Treasury power to delegate its functions under the Order. Article 18 confirms that the provisions of this Order apply to the Crown but, in the event of a contravention, the Crown is not criminally liable. Article 20 revokes the Terrorism (United Nations Measures) Order 2001, save that in any case where a direction has been made under article 4 of that Order, the provisions of that Order continue to apply. Other instruments and provisions amending the 2001 Order are also revoked. The 2001 Order provided for enforcement of the EC Regulation and gave a power for a domestic asset freeze. Schedule 1 makes provisions about information and evidence. Schedule 2 lists the provisions revoked by virtue of article 20. A partial regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business may be attained from the Asset Freezing Unit of the Financial Crime Team, HM Treasury, 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ and is also available on HM Treasury’s website (www.hm-treasury.gov.uk). A copy of the regulatory impact assessment has been placed in the libraries of both Houses of Parliament.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

What Parliament said

Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source