UK Offence Report

Offences relating to feedingstuffs containing blood products or blood meal

paragraph 13(5) of SCHEDULE 5 of The Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (No. 2) Regulations 2006 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

5 It is an offence for

a home compounder registered under paragraph 12(4)(b) to—

a keep ruminant animals where blood products are used;

b keep animals other than fish where blood meal is used;

c consign feedingstuffs containing blood products or blood meal (whether complete or partly complete) from his holding; or

d use feedingstuffs containing blood products or blood meal with

a total protein content of 50% or more in the production of complete feedingstuffs.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
breaching the provision
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach paragraph 13(5) of SCHEDULE 5?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies (No. 2) Regulations 2006.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
2 May 2006
In force from
3 May 2006
Extent
E

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations, which apply in England, revoke and remake with amendments the Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathies Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/68), which enforced Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down rules for the prevention, control and eradication of certain transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (OJ No. L 147, 31.5.2001, p. 1) as amended by and as read with the provisions in Schedule 1 (“the Community TSE Regulation”). The Regulations provide that the Secretary of State is the competent authority for the purposes of the Community TSE Regulation (except in Schedule 6, where the competent authority is the Food Standards Agency) (regulation 3) and provide an exception for research (regulation 4). The provisions in Part 2 introduce the Schedules. Part 3 deals with administration and enforcement. Regulations 6 to 10 deal with approvals, authorisations, licences and registrations, occupier’s duties, suspension, amendment and revocations of approvals, etc., and an appeals procedure. Regulation 11 deals with valuations. Regulations 12 to 14 give powers to the Secretary of State and the local authority to appoint inspectors, and deal with powers of entry and powers of inspectors. Regulation 15 provides for a notice procedure, and regulation 16 provides for licences permitting movement during a movement restriction. Regulations 17 to 19 deal with obstruction of an inspector, penalties, and offences by a body corporate. A person guilty of an offence under these Regulations is liable— a on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to imprisonment for a term of three months or both, or b on conviction on indictment, to a fine or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or both. Regulation 20 details who is responsible for enforcing these Regulations. Regulation 21 revokes the Transmissible Spongiform Encelopathies Regulations 2006 and the Bovines and Bovine Products (Trade) Regulations 1999, which amongst other things prevented trade in British beef with other member States and third countries. Schedule 1 lists provisions that amend Regulation (EC) No 999/2001 and with which it must be read. Schedule 2 deals with monitoring for TSEs. Paragraph 1 provides for notification to the Secretary of State of fallen stock that must be tested for TSE under the Community TSE Regulation. Paragraph 2 makes it an offence to consign an over-age animal to a slaughterhouse for human consumption or to slaughter such an animal for human consumption. Paragraph 3 provides for brain stem sampling of specified bovine animals. Paragraph 4 creates a requirement for anyone slaughtering animals over 30 months old for human consumption to have a Required Method of Operation. Paragraph 5 provides for retention of products and their disposal, and paragraph 6 deals with compensation. Paragraphs 7 to 14 specify the minimum requirements that must appear in a Required Method of Operation. Schedule 3 deals with control and eradication of TSEs in bovine animals. Paragraph 1 provides for notification of a suspect animal to the Secretary of State. Paragraphs 2 and 3 provide for the restriction and slaughter of the suspect. Paragraphs 4 and 5 deal with the offspring and cohorts of the suspect. Paragraph 6 deals with compensation for an animal that dies under restriction, and paragraph 7 deals with placing on the market. Paragraphs 8 to 10 deal with compensation. Schedule 4 deals with control and eradication of TSEs in sheep and goats. Paragraph 1 provides for notification of a suspect animal to the Secretary of State. Paragraphs 2 and 3 provide for the restriction and slaughter of the suspect. Paragraphs 4 and 5 deal with movement restrictions. Paragraphs 6 to 8 provide for action following confirmation. Paragraph 9 provides for time for appeals, and paragraph 10 provides for killing and destruction. Paragraphs 11 to 13 deal with infected animals from another holding, common grazing and multiple flocks on a holding. Paragraph 14 deals with subsequent occupiers of the land. Paragraphs 15 to 21 set out the procedure to be followed after the killing or destruction. Paragraph 15 restricts the introduction of animals onto a holding. Paragraph 16 regulates the use of ovine germinal products, and paragraph 17 restricts the movement of animals from a holding. Paragraph 18 specifies when the time relating to restrictions begins. Paragraph 19 provides for notification of animals that die while under restriction. Paragraph 20 deals with placing on the market of progeny, and paragraph 21 requires notification to the Secretary of State before the owner may consign sheep aged over 18 months for slaughter. Paragraph 22 deals with derogations from the requirement for the killing and destruction of sheep and goats. Paragraphs 23 to 25 deal with compensation. Schedule 5 deals with feedingstuffs. Paragraphs 1 to 3 prohibit feeding specified feedingstuffs to ruminant and non-ruminant animals, and provide for exceptions. Paragraphs 4 and 5 provide for movement restrictions and slaughter of animals suspected of having been fed prohibited feedingstuffs, and paragraph 6 provides for compensation. Paragraph 7 prohibits the slaughter for human consumption of restricted animals. Paragraphs 8 and 9 regulate the production and use of fishmeal for feeding to non-ruminant animals. Paragraphs 10 and 11 regulate feedingstuffs containing dicalcium phosphate or tricalcium phosphate. Paragraphs 12 and 13 regulate feedingstuffs containing blood products and blood meal. Paragraph 14 makes provision for changes in use of equipment. Paragraphs 15 and 16 control the manufacture, storage and transport of processed animal protein and products containing it. Paragraph 17 controls exports, and paragraph 18 regulates fertilisers derived from animal protein. Paragraph 19 deals with records, and paragraph 20 deals with cross-contamination. Schedule 6 deals with specified risk material, mechanically recovered meat and slaughtering techniques. Paragraph 1 appoints the Food Standards Agency as the competent authority for this Schedule. Paragraph 2 imposes certain duties on local authorities in relation to butcher shops. Paragraph 3 makes provision for training of slaughterhouse, cutting plant and butcher shop staff. Paragraph 4 deals with mechanically recovered meat, paragraph 5 with pithing, paragraph 6 with tongue harvesting and paragraph 7 with head meat harvesting. Paragraph 8 controls the removal of specified risk material, and paragraphs 9 and 10 deal with bovine animals and sheep and goats at a slaughterhouse. Paragraph 11 deals with young lamb and goat stamps. Paragraph 12 deals with the removal of spinal cord from sheep and goats. Paragraph 13 provides for the authorisation of cutting plants, and paragraph 15 controls the removal of specified risk material at a cutting plant. Paragraph 16 provides for removal of vertebral column that is specified risk material at cutting plants not authorised under paragraph 13. Paragraph 14 provides for the authorisation and registration of butcher shops, and paragraph 17 controls the removal of specified risk material at such shops. Paragraph 18 deals with meat from other member States. Paragraphs 19 and 20 require the staining of specified risk material, and paragraph 21 provides for the security of specified risk material. Paragraph 22 prohibits the supply of specified risk material for human consumption. Schedule 7 deals with dispatch of live bovine animals and products derived from them to other member States and to third countries. Paragraph 1 prohibits the dispatch of certain live animals, meat and certain specified risk material to other member States and to third countries. Paragraph 2 prohibits the dispatch of bovine heads and meat containing specified risk material to third countries. A regulatory impact assessment has been prepared and placed in the library of each House of Parliament. Copies can be obtained from the BSE and Animal By-Products Division, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Area 301, 1a Page Street, London SW1P 4PQ.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.90.

Basis
the provision says “it is an offence”; the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
Confidence
0.90 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source