Obstruction of British sea-fishery officers
article 29(1) of The Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order 2005
- Revoked
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
1 Any person who— a fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any requirement imposed by a British sea-fishery officer under the powers conferred on British sea-fishery officers by articles 25 and 26; b without reasonable excuse prevents, or attempts to prevent, any other person from complying with any such requirement; or c assaults a person who is exercising any of the powers conferred on him by articles 25 to 27 or intentionally obstructs him in the exercise of any of those powers, is guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- obstructing an official exercising a power
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: intentionally; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
1 Any person who— a fails without reasonable excuse to comply with any requirement imposed by a British sea-fishery officer under the powers conferred on British sea-fishery officers by articles 25 and 26; b without reasonable excuse prevents, or attempts to prevent, any other person from complying with any su
What would breach article 29(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order 2005.
- Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
- Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Sea Fishing (Recovery Measures) Order 2008 (revoked)
- Revoked on
- 30 September 2008
- Made
- 25 February 2005
- In force from
- 28 February 2005
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order provides for the administration and enforcement in England of the provisions of Annex IVa and IVc (“the Annexes”) to Council Regulation (EC) No. 27/2005 (OJ No L12 14.1.2005. p.1) fixing for 2005 the fishing opportunities and associated conditions for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Community waters and, for Community vessels, in waters where catch limitations are required. Further, the Order provides for the enforcement in England of monitoring, inspection and surveillance provisions as set out in Council Regulation (EC) No. 423/2004 (OJ No L70 9.3.2004.p.70) establishing measures for the recovery of cod stocks. Part 2 of the Order relates to Cod and Part 3 to Sole. The Order contains provisions relating to the establishment and aggregation of management periods (articles 3 and 13 for cod and sole respectively), the number of days which a vessel may be absent from port (articles 4 and 14) , the use of regulated fishing gear (articles 5 and 15) and the manner in which days may be transferred between fishing vessels within the same management period (articles 6 and 16). Further, the Order sets out provisions for the transportation of cod and sole (articles 7 and 17), a provision relating to the mixing of species within containers on board fishing vessels (articles 8 and 18), procedures for the landing of cod in designated and non-designated ports (articles 9 and 10), procedures for transhipment or landing sole in third countries (article 19), a margin of tolerance relating to the recording of catches of fish in logbooks (articles 11 and 21) and provisions relating to the maintenance of logbooks (articles 12 and 22). The Order creates offences in respect of the contravention, by the person in charge of the relevant fishing boat (or the individuals otherwise specifically referred to) of provisions of the Annexes. The offences relate to absences from port without notified fishing gear (articles 3 and 13) or in excess of the days permitted (articles 4 and 14), failure to use regulated fishing gear in the manner set out in the Annexes (articles 5 and 15), giving false information when attempting to transfer days from one vessel to another (articles 6 and 16), transporting species (articles 7 and 17) or mixing of species (articles 8 and 18) in a manner inconsistent with the Annexes, the landing of cod in designated and non designated ports in contravention of notification and documentary requirements (articles 9 and 10), the transhipment or landing of sole relating to third countries (article 19) and failing to comply with the 8% tolerance for logbook records relating to catches of fish and failure to handover and dispatch logbooks in the manner prescribed (articles 11, 12, 21 and 22). Part 4 of the Order makes provisions for enforcement. The Order provides that a person guilty of an offence under it other than an offence under article 29 is liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £50,000 and on conviction on indictment to a fine. Further fines up to and including the value of any fish caught in committing the offence are permitted and the court may also order the seizure of fish caught or equipment used in, or in activities leading to, the commission of the offence (article 23). The Order also provides for the recovery of fines imposed, or treated as imposed, by a magistrates' court (article 24). For the purposes of enforcing provisions of the Annexes for which provision is made in Parts 2 and 3 of the Order, the Order confers on British sea-fishery officers the powers to enter premises, to go on board fishing boats, to stop and search vehicles transporting fish, to examine fish, to require the production of documents, to search for and seize documents, to take a boat to the nearest convenient port and to seize fish and fishing gear (articles 25 to 27). Protection of such officers from liability is set out in article 28, and obstructing them is an offence under article 29, with a fine of up to the statutory maximum on summary conviction and a fine on conviction on indictment. Articles 30 and 31 deal with corporate and equivalent offences and admissibility of documents in evidence. Provision for consequential amendment and revocation is made by articles 32 and 33. In addition article 32 includes a provision bringing forward the time for submission of logbook entries for landings in designated ports. A Regulatory Impact Assessment in relation to the Annexes and this Order has been prepared and placed in the library of each House of Parliament. Copies can be obtained from Defra, Fisheries Division 1, Room 303, 10 Whitehall Place, London SW1A 2HH.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Landing of cod at a designated portarticle 10(1)
- Landing of cod at a designated portarticle 10(5)
- Recording information on catches of fisharticle 11
- Maintenance of logbooksarticle 12(4)
- Establishment of management periodsarticle 13(4)
- Absences from portarticle 14(1)
- Carriage and operation of fishing gearsarticle 15(1)
- Carriage and operation of fishing gearsarticle 15(3)
- Transport of solearticle 17
- Mixing of speciesarticle 18
- Transhipment or landing relating to third countriesarticle 19(1)
- Weighing of solearticle 20(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Sea Fishing (Restriction on Days at Sea) Order 2005 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2005