Offences and penalties
regulation 15(2) of The Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas Regulations 1997
- Revoked
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
2 Any person who, in connection with these Regulations or the Community legislation, makes
a statement or uses
a document which he knows to be false in
a material particular, or recklessly makes
a statement or uses
a document which is false in
a material particular, shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (recklessly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: recklessly.
What would breach regulation 15(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas Regulations 1997.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (1997-12-31); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas Regulations 2003
- Revoked on
- 1 October 2003
- Made
- 26 November 1997
- In force from
- 31 December 1997
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations (“the Regulations”) consolidate (with changes) the Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas Regulations 1993 (S.I. 1993/1626, as amended by S.I. 1993/3036, S.I. 1994/2894 and S.I. 1996/1939). The Regulations, which extend to the United Kingdom as a whole, make provision for the administration of the quota system for sheep annual premium established by Articles 5a and 5b of Council Regulation 3013/89 and the quota system for suckler cow premium established by Articles 4(d) to 4(f) of Council Regulation 805/68. Definitions of references to those Council Regulations may be found in regulation 2(1) of the Regulations. The Regulations— lay down rules for determining the location of a producer’s holding (regulation 3 as read with Schedule 1); lay down rules for notifying transfers and leases of quota (regulation 4); specify the proportion of quota that is transferred to the national reserve on a transfer of quota without a corresponding transfer of a holding (regulation 5(1)); specify a minimum level of suckler cow premium quota that small producers may transfer or lease out (regulation 5(2)); lay down rules for determining whether or not a producer has transferred quota without also transferring his holding (regulation 6 and Schedule 2); lay down rules in relation to the place of origin, acquisition and use of quota from the national reserve (regulation 7); specify that in certain cases quota may be transferred or leased between sensitive zones as defined by regulation 2(1) (regulation 8); provide for the division of the national reserve into 6 divisions, each division to correspond with a sensitive zone (regulation 9); provide for the distribution of quota in the national reserve into the aforementioned divisions (regulation 10); lay down the principles governing allocations of quota from the national reserve (regulation 11; Schedules 3, 4 and 5); establish a quota register and provide for the supply of copies of register entries in specified circumstances (regulations 12 and 13); give specified persons a number of powers which may be used for the purpose of verifying an application for an allocation of quota from the national reserve (regulation 14)); create offences and penalties (regulation 15); revoke S.I. 1993/1626, as amended (regulation 16). The principal changes of substance made by the Regulations are as follows: the 2 sensitive zones into which Northern Ireland was formerly divided have been combined into a single sensitive zone; the rules regarding the location of a holding situated in more than one sensitive zone which are set out in regulation 3 have been clarified; revisions have been made to the conditions governing eligibility under categories III, group (b), IV and VI, group (a), of the national reserve which are set out in Schedule 3; to the rules for determining the amount of quota to which persons falling within those categories are entitled which are set out in Schedule 4; and to the test for determining when an allocation of quota from the national reserve is to be effective which is set out in Schedule 5. A regulatory appraisal has been prepared in respect of these Regulations. A copy of it has been deposited in the library of each House of Parliament.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Any person who fails without reasonable excuse to comply with a requirement or prohibition imposed on him by…regulation 15(1)
- Any person who intentionally obstructs any officer such as is specified in paragraph (1) of regulation 14 in…regulation 15(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Sheep Annual Premium and Suckler Cow Premium Quotas Regulations 1997 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1997