Punishment for fraudulent trading
regulation 58(1) of The Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies with Variable Capital) Regulations 1996
- Revoked
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
1 If any business of an investment company with variable capital is carried on with intent to defraud creditors of the company or creditors of any other person, or for any fraudulent purpose, every person who was knowingly
a party to the carrying on of the business in that manner is guilty of an offence and liable—
a on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment not exceeding
a term of two years or to
a fine or to both;
b on summary conviction, to imprisonment not exceeding
a term of three months or to
a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or to both.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly, with intent to).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly, with intent to.
What would breach regulation 58(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person was knowingly a party to the carrying on of the business in that manner.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies with Variable Capital) Regulations 1996.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Open-Ended Investment Companies Regulations 2001
- Made
- 11 November 1996
- In force from
- 6 January 1997
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
The Regulations make provision for the formation in Great Britain of a class of body corporate referred to in the Regulations as an investment company with variable capital. The Regulations also make provision for the authorisation of investment companies with variable capital and for their subsequent supervision. An investment company with variable capital formed under the Regulations will be a collective investment scheme within the meaning of section 75 of the Financial Services Act 1986 (c. 60) the object of which is investment in a limited class of investments (referred to in the Regulations as “transferable securities”). It will also be an open-ended investment company within the meaning of section 75(8) of that Act. In addition an investment company with variable capital will be an undertaking for collective investment in transferable securities to which Council Directive 85/611/EEC on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (“the UCITS Directive”) applies. As such, it will be able to take advantage of the rights which that Directive confers in relation to the undertakings to which it applies to market their shares in other States of the European Economic Area. At present, the only undertakings formed in Great Britain which are able to take advantage of the rights conferred by the UCITS Directive are authorised unit trust schemes the object of which is investment in transferable securities. Part I of the Regulations is general and contains definitions of certain of the terms used in the Regulations. Part II of, and Schedules 1 to 3 to, the Regulations are concerned with the formation and the subsequent control and supervision of an investment company with variable capital. Regulations 3 and 4 and Schedule 1 concern the formation of a company and the registration of certain details relating to it with the registrar of companies. Regulation 5 and Schedule 2 are concerned with the custody of the company’s property and with the company’s depositary who is the person to whom the property will be entrusted for safekeeping. Regulation 6 extends certain legislative powers under the Financial Services Act 1986 so as to be exercisable in relation to investment companies with variable capital. The powers are vested in the Securities and Investments Board (“SIB”). (Regulation 73 makes provision as to SIB’s functions under the Regulations.) Regulations 7 to 12 of the Regulations contain provisions as to the authorisation by SIB of an investment company with variable capital. Schedule 3 contains provisions concerning the contents of a company’s instrument of incorporation. An application for authorisation will be required and SIB must be satisfied that the company will, if formed and authorised, meet certain criteria (set out in regulation 10). There is provision for representations to be made against any refusal to authorise a company and there is also provision for a company to be issued with a certificate which is a necessary prerequisite to it being able to enjoy the rights conferred by the UCITS Directive. Regulations 13 and 14 contain provisions relating to the name which may be used by an investment company with variable capital and regulation 15 contains provisions requiring a company to seek prior approval from SIB for certain changes, including changes to the company’s instrument of incorporation. Regulations 16 to 20 confer powers on SIB to intervene in the affairs of a company once it has been authorised. The powers in question are powers to revoke authorisation, to give directions and to make applications to the court. Regulat! ions 2 1 to 24 confer concurrent powers on the Secretary of State and SIB to appoint inspectors to investigate the affairs of an investment company with variable capital. Regulations 25 to 27 contain provisions as to the winding up and dissolution of an investment company with variable capital. Part III of, and Schedules 4 to 7 to, the Regulations set out the corporate framework within which an investment company with variable capital will operate. This framework will be supplemented by regulations made by SIB under the provisions of regulation 6 of the Regulations. Regulations 28 to 30 contain provisions concerning the directors of an investment company with variable capital and the inspection of their service contracts. Regulation 31 makes provisions as to general meetings of the company and regulations 32 to 38 make provision as to the capacity of a company and the validity of certain transactions involving its directors. Regulations 39 to 46 contain provision about the nature of the shares that an investment company with variable capital may issue, about share certificates and (together with Schedule 5 to the Regulations) share transfers and about the maintenance, closure and rectification of a register of shareholders which an investment company with varia! ble capital will be required to keep in accordance with Schedule 4. By virtue of regulation 42, an investment company with variable capital will be able to issue bearer shares. Regulations 47 to 59 contain various provision s that are relevant to the operation of an investment company with variable capital. The provisions in question are ones about the powers which a company enjoys incidental to the carrying on of its business (regulation 47), the details which must be included in its correspondence (regulations 48 and 49), the execution and authentication of documents (regulations 50 to 54), liability and exemptions from liability (regulations 55 to 57), fraudulent trading (regulation 58) and the powers which the company has to make provision for its employees on the cessation or transfer of its business (regulation 59). Regulations 60 to 63 and Schedule 6 make provision as to reports containing accounts which must be prepared by an investment company with variable capital, as to the audit of the reports and as to auditors. Regulation 64 of, and Schedule 7 to, the Regulations contain provisions concerning the merger and division of investment companies with variable capital. Part IV of the Regulations contains miscellaneous provisions, including provisions about notifications to the registrar of companies, prosecutions and service of documents. Part IV (regulation 74) also contains provisions extending the powers that SIB has under the Financial Services Act 1986 to raise fees in relation to the authorisation and supervision of authorised unit trust schemes so as to be exercisable for like purposes in relation to the authorisation and supervision of investment companies with variable capital. In addition, Part IV of and Schedule 8 to the Regulations make various minor and consequential amendments to other enactments including an amendment which has the effect that an investment company with variable capital will be an authorised person under the Financial Services Act 1986 (paragraph 11 of Schedule 8) and an amendment which excludes such a company from the provisions of section 716 of the Companies Act 1985 (paragraph 8 of Schedule 8). A compliance cost assessment relating to the Regulations has been prepared and a copy may be obtained from Mrs Janet Robbins, Financial Services, HM Treasury, Parliament Street, London, SW1P 3AG. Tel: 0171 270 5294. Fax: 0171 270 4694.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies With Variable Capital) Regulations 1996 Lords · 31 October 1996
-
Investment Companies
Commons · 6 November 1996
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 101(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation) That the draft Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies with Variable Capital) Regulations 1996, which were laid before this House on 17th July, in the last Session of Parliament, be approved.— [Mr. Anthony Coombs.]
-
Data Matching
Lords · 25 February 1998
(" S.I. 19962827. The Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies with Variable Capital) Regulations 1996. In Schedule 8, paragraph 3 and 26.")
-
Open-Ended Investment Companies Regulations 2001
Lords · 16 March 2001
Those principles were established in the existing regulations governing OEICs—the Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies with Variable Capital) Regulations 1996. The regulations before your Lordships today make no major changes. They rationalise and modernise the regulatory structure for OEICs. The provisions of the regulations also represent an important liberalisation. They will pave the way…
Other offences in the same instrument
- Agent’s defaultparagraph 12(2) of SCHEDULE 4
- Statement by auditor ceasing to hold officeparagraph 19(1) of SCHEDULE 6
- Eligibilityparagraph 3(3) of SCHEDULE 6
- Rightsparagraph 8(2) of SCHEDULE 6
- Dissolution on winding up by the courtregulation 26(7)
- Applications for authorisationregulation 7(5)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Open-Ended Investment Companies (Investment Companies with Variable Capital) Regulations 1996 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1996