Customs powers to demand evidence of destination which goods reach
article 9 of The Former Yugoslavia (United Nations Sanctions) (Isle of Man) Order 1994
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Housing, planning, heritage and land
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
9 Any exporter or any shipper or goods which have been exported from the Isle of Man, shall, if so required by the Treasury, furnish within such time as it may allow proof to its satisfaction that the goods have reached either— i a destination to which they were authorised to be exported by a licence granted under this Order or under the Export of Goods (Control) (Croatian and Bosnian Territories) Order 1993; or ii a destination to which their exportation was not prohibited by this Order, and, if he fails to do so, he shall be guilty of an offence unless he proves that he did not consent to or connive at the goods reaching any destination other than such a destination as aforesaid.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- an exporter
- Conduct
- importing or exporting without authority
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Legal burden on the defendant
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an exporter meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision gives a defence the defendant must prove, on the balance of probabilities. A legal burden of that kind can be read down to a merely evidential one under section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 where placing it on the defendant would be disproportionate (R v Lambert [2001] UKHL 37; Sheldrake v DPP [2004] UKHL 43).
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
The defence, as drafted
and, if he fails to do so, he shall be guilty of an offence unless he proves that he did not consent to or connive at the goods reaching any destination other than such a destination as aforesaid.
What would breach article 9?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Moving the goods across the border under the Former Yugoslavia (United Nations Sanctions) (Isle of Man) Order 1994 without the licence the instrument requires.
- Holding a licence for one consignment and using it for another.
- Sending goods in transit through the United Kingdom, where the provision catches transit as well as import and export.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- 6 months
the level is stated but no money value is given: this instrument extends outside the United Kingdom, where the standard scale set by s.122(1) of the Sentencing Act 2020 does not run.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 17 October 1994
- In force from
- 19 October 1994
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order, made under the United Nations Act 1946 and applying only to the Isle of Man, imposes restrictions pursuant to a decision of the Security Council of the United Nations, in resolution 820 (1993) of 17th April 1993, on the export of goods to the Bosnian Serb controlled areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina or the United Nations Protected Areas of the Republic of Croatia. It also imposes restrictions pursuant to a further Security Council decision, in resolution 942 (1994) of 23rd September 1994, on the carrying on of economic activities by persons connected with the Bosnian Serb controlled areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina and the provision of services for businesses carried on in those areas. The Order also places restrictions on certain actions making available or otherwise transferring funds or other financial assets or resources to or for the benefit of persons connected with the Bosnian Serb controlled areas of the Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- If for the purposes of obtaining any licence or permission under this Order any person makes any statement…article 10(1)
- Any person who has done any act under the authority of a licence or permission granted under this Order and…article 10(2)
- Declaration as to goods: powers of searcharticle 11(2)
- Declaration as to goods: powers of searcharticle 11(3)
- Provision relating to articles 4, 5 and 6article 8(2)
- Any person who— a without reasonable excuse, refuses or fails within the time and in the manner specified…paragraph 5 of SCHEDULE
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Former Yugoslavia (United Nations Sanctions) (Isle of Man) Order 1994 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Housing, planning, heritage and landOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1994