Breach of official duty
regulation 58(1) of The Crofting Commission (Elections) (Scotland) Regulations 2011
- Revoked
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Elections and representation of the people
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
1 If a person to whom this regulation applies is in breach of his or her official duty under these Regulations, without reasonable cause, that person commits an offence and he or she is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 58(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Crofting Commission (Elections) (Scotland) Regulations 2011, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £10,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Crofting Commission (Elections) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2016
- Revoked on
- 16 December 2016
- Made
- 21 December 2011
- In force from
- 22 December 2011
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of these Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations set out the arrangements under which elections to the Crofting Commission are to be conducted. Regulations 4 and 5 provide who may and may not vote at such an election. Regulations 6 and 7 provide for the appointment by the Scottish Ministers of a returning officer for each election and for the payment of any expenses. Regulation 8 and the Schedule divide the Commission electoral area into six constituencies, with each constituency returning one member. Regulations 9 and 10 set out provisions relating to qualification and disqualification of candidates for election. The timetable for conducting elections and provision regarding notice are detailed in regulations11 and 12. The procedures for nomination of candidates are detailed in regulations 13 to 17. Arrangements for the method of election, manner of voting (by post or by proxy), the form of the ballot papers and arrangements for absent electors are detailed in regulations 18 to 26. Part III sets out arrangements for the issue and receipt of ballot papers (regulations 27 to 37). Part IV sets out arrangements for the counting of ballot papers and the declaration of result (regulations 38 to 54). Part V sets out offences and penalties (regulations 55 to 62). Part VI includes miscellaneous provisions relating to candidates’ expenses and election returns (regulations 63 to 65).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Personationregulation 55(1)
- A person commits an offence if — a he or she votes by post, whether as an elector or as proxy, or applies to…regulation 56(1)
- A person commits an offence if he or she votes as elector otherwise than by proxy— a more than once in any…regulation 56(3)
- A person commits an offence if he or she votes at an election as proxy for more than 2personsregulation 56(4)
- A person commits an offence if he or she knowingly induces or procures some other person to do an act which…regulation 56(5)
- A person commits an offence if he or she— a engages in an act specified in paragraph(2) at an election; and…regulation 57(1)
- A person who aids, abets, counsels or procures the commission of an offence under paragraph(1) commits an…regulation 57(3)
- Tampering with nomination papers, ballot papers etcregulation 59(1)
- Elections: false information in nomination papers etcregulation 60(1)
- Elections: false information in nomination papers etcregulation 60(2)
- Requirement of secrecyregulation 61(5)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Crofting Commission (Elections) (Scotland) Regulations 2011 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Elections and representation of the peopleOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2011