Contents of proposal
paragraph 5.36(1)(b) of SCHEDULE 1 of The Insolvency (Amendment) Rules (Northern Ireland) 2006
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
b contain— i a statement that the debtor is eligible to propose a voluntary arrangement; ii a short explanation why, in his opinion, a voluntary arrangement is desirable, and give reasons why his creditors may be expected to concur with such an arrangement; and iii a statement that the debtor is aware that he commits an offence under Article 236A if, for the purpose of obtaining the approval of his creditors to his proposal, he makes any false representation, or fraudulently does, or omits to do, anything.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (for the purpose of obtaining, fraudulently).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: fraudulently, for the purpose of obtaining.
What would breach paragraph 5.36(1)(b) of SCHEDULE 1?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Insolvency (Amendment) Rules (Northern Ireland) 2006.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 9 February 2006
- In force from
- 27 March 2006
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Rules) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Rules make a number of changes to the Insolvency Rules (Northern Ireland) 1991 (S.R. 1991 No. 364) (“the 1991 Rules”). The changes to the 1991 Rules, the majority of which are set out in Schedule 1 of these Rules, are generally consequential on amendments made to the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 (S.I. 1989/2405 (N.I. 19)) by the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/1455 (N.I. 10)). The main amendment is the substitution of Part 2 of the 1991 Rules by the provisions set out in Part 2 of Schedule 1. This Part of the Schedule sets out the detailed rules for the administration procedure that was introduced as Schedule B1 to the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 by Article 3(2) of the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 in substitution for Part III of the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989. The substituted Part 2 of the 1991 Rules draws substantially on the existing rules but makes new provisions in consequence of the revised and extended administration procedures introduced by the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005. In particular, under Schedule B1: In addition to the existing route into administration by court order new entry routes will be provided for companies and their directors and for holders of qualifying floating charges, and these will be outside of the court. Administration will be subject to new time limits to ensure that the process is conducted quickly and efficiently. Administrators will have to send copies of their proposals to creditors within 8 weeks, and hold a creditors' meeting within 10 weeks. There will also be a time limit of 12 months as the initial maximum duration of the whole administration procedure and the administrator must fulfil his duties as soon as reasonably practicable. The administrator will be able to extend any of the time limits with the permission of the court, or with the consent of creditors. The administrator will be required to rescue the company, as a going concern, wherever this is reasonably practicable. In those cases where it is not possible, the objective will be to provide a better result for the creditors of the company as a whole than would be achieved in an immediate winding up and only where this is not possible will he or she realise property to make a distribution to secured or preferential creditors. The administrator will have powers to make payments to preferential and secured creditors in all circumstances, and to unsecured creditors with the permission of the court. The administrator will, on the filing of an appropriate notice, be able to move the company from administration into creditors' voluntary liquidation so that payments can be made to unsecured creditors without the leave of the court or, alternatively, to move from administration to dissolution in those cases where there are no further assets to be distributed. Parts 1, 3, 4, and 10 of Schedule 1 make a number of amendments to the provisions in the 1991 Rules that relate to company voluntary arrangements, receiverships and liquidations, and rules of general application. These changes are consequential on the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 making a share of any assets subject to a floating charge known as the “prescribed part” available for unsecured creditors. These amendments concern the provision of information for creditors, the powers for receivers to deal with the “prescribed part” and applications to disapply the “prescribed part”. There are a number of minor amendments that are consequential on the introduction of the new administration procedure and the abolition of Crown preference by the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005. A modified Rule 12.03(2)(b) provides that any obligation arising as a result of an order made in family proceedings or any obligation arising under a maintenance assessment made under the Child Support (Northern Ireland) Order 1991,with the exception of lump sums or costs, is not provable in bankruptcy. Thus, lump sum and costs are now provable in bankruptcy proceeding whilst periodical payments continue to be non-provable. Rule 4.096 in the 1991 Rules dealing with mutual credits and set-off has been replaced with a new version designed to provide greater detail and clarity of meaning for the user to reflect applicable case law, and to bring the rule on set-off for liquidation into line with new Rule 2.086 dealing with set-off in administration. Rules 4.134, 4.135, 4.156, 6.135 and 6.136 are amended and Rules 4.134A, 4.134B, 4.156A, 6.135A and Schedule 4 are inserted to make provision as to the payment of remuneration to liquidators and trustees consequent on the amendments made to the Insolvency Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1996 (S.R.1996 No. 574). Originally the Rules made provision for the payment of remuneration of liquidators and trustees in certain circumstances on the basis set for the official receiver under the Insolvency Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1996. The official receiver’s entitlement to remuneration in those circumstances is revoked by the Insolvency (Amendment) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2006 with the result that the substance of the revoked provisions in now repeated in the Insolvency Rules (Northern Ireland) 1991. Transitional provisions provide for the application of the former basis for remuneration to cases already on foot at the date these Rules come into operation. Part 5 of Schedule 1 makes a number of amendments to the provisions of the 1991 Rules, which relate to individual voluntary arrangements. In particular, a number of amendments are made as a consequence of substituting a new Article 235 and the introduction of Articles 237A to 237G into the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989. These principally relate to the introduction of a new “fast-track” individual voluntary arrangement, which will be available only to undischarged bankrupts and in which only the Official Receiver will act as nominee or supervisor. It also contains more detailed rules applying to annulment in cases where an individual voluntary arrangement has been approved and implemented. Part 6 of Schedule 1 makes a number of amendments to the provisions of the 1991 Rules, which relate to bankruptcy. In particular— Rules and references to summary administration are omitted; Rules in relation to income payments agreements are included; Rules relating to discharge from bankruptcy are amended; Rules to deal with a bankrupt’s interest in a dwelling-house are revised; and Rules are introduced to implement the provisions on bankruptcy restrictions orders (This term is defined in Schedule 5 to the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 to include interim bankruptcy restrictions orders and bankruptcy restrictions undertakings). Article 342 of the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 1989 permits the court to make an order, on the application of the official receiver or the trustee of the bankrupt’s estate, for the redirection by a postal operator of a bankrupt’s post for a period not exceeding three months. A new Rule, 6.227A, provides for procedure on an application for such an order and Form 6.83 is revised. Postal redirection orders are typically sought only in cases of non-cooperation or where the applicant believes that a bankrupt has not made a full disclosure of his affairs (for example, in an attempt to conceal assets). Part 7 of Schedule 1 introduces Part 6A into the 1991 Rules which relates to the registers by which individual voluntary arrangements are recorded and bankruptcy restrictions orders will be recorded. Part 8 of Schedule 1 makes a number of amendments to the 1991 Rules which relate to court procedure and practice. Part 9 of Schedule 1 amends, to take account of House of Lord’s criticism in Re Park Air Services Limited [2000] 2 AC 172, the formula quoted in Rule 11.13 of the 1991 Rules for use in a bankruptcy or winding-up to calculate the discounted value of a debt due for payment on a date subsequent to that on which a dividend is paid. Schedule 2 makes a number of amendments to Schedule 2 to the 1991 Rules. New forms are introduced and other forms are revised in consequence of the matters set out in Schedule 1. Minor amendments are made to a few forms unrelated to the changes made by the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005. The costs to business of the commencement of the provisions of the Insolvency (Northern Ireland) Order 2005 are set out in the Regulatory Impact Assessment prepared for that Order. Copies of the assessment are available from the Insolvency Service, Fermanagh House, Ormeau Avenue, Belfast BT2 8NJ.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Contents of proposalparagraph 5.36(1) of SCHEDULE 1
- Contents of proposalparagraph 5.36(1)(b)(iii) of SCHEDULE 1
- “proposal” means the document setting out the terms of the voluntary arrangement which the debtor is…paragraph 54 of SCHEDULE 1
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”; c10_offence_under_parent_act
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Insolvency (Amendment) Rules (Northern Ireland) 2006 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2006