Restrictions on sale of methylated spirits and methylated ether
article 12(2) of Poisons (Northern Ireland) Order 1976
- In force
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Firearms, offensive weapons, explosives and poisons
The instrument creating this offence has not been revoked so far as the data shows.
What the provision says
2 Any person selling methylated spirits by retail otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of paragraph (1), and any person making
a false statement to such seller or to an intending seller for the purpose of procuring
a sale, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
3 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 12(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Poisons (Northern Ireland) Order 1976.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £1,000
- Standard scale
- Level 3
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
in Northern Ireland a reference to a level is construed as referring to the standard scale as it currently stands (Fines and Penalties (NI) Order 1984 art.5(3)), not as it stood when the instrument was made.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Firearms offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales
Covers possession, transfer and manufacture of prohibited weapons and ammunition, including the statutory minimum sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- In force
- Made
- 30 July 1976
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- N.I.
How this was established: read from the revised (currently in force) text.
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Northern Ireland (Poisons)
Commons · 23 July 1976 · Mr. Dunn
The purpose of these Orders is mainly to consolidate the legislation relating to pharmacy and to poisons in Northern Ireland. The comparable legislation in Great Britain is already conveniently contained in two Acts, the Pharmacy Act 1954 and the Poisons Act 1972. At present the pharmacy and poisons legislation in Northern Ireland is contained in four Acts which have been subject to substantial amendment over the…
-
Northern Ireland (Poisons)
Commons · 23 July 1976 · Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Oscar Murton)
It might be for the convenience of the House if we also discuss the Poisons (Northern Ireland) Order 1976. I understand that both are consolidation measures.
-
Northern Ireland (Poisons)
Commons · 23 July 1976
Resolved, That the Poisons (Northern Ireland) Order 1976, a draft of which was laid before this House on 30th June, be approved.
-
Northern Ireland (Poisons)
Commons · 23 July 1976 · The Under-Secretary of State for Northern Ireland (Mr. James A. Dunn)
I beg to move, That the Poisons (Northern Ireland) Order 1976, a draft of which was laid before this House on 30th June, be approved
Other offences in the same instrument
- Regulations as to distribution of non-medicinal poisons by district councilsarticle 11(2)
- Restrictions on sale of methylated spirits and methylated etherarticle 12(5)
- Supplementary provisions relating to methylated spirits and methylated etherarticle 13(1)
- Supplementary provisions relating to methylated spirits and methylated etherarticle 13(3)
- Supplementary provisions relating to methylated spirits and methylated etherarticle 13(6)
- Poisons Inspectors, etcarticle 16(4)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction; the provision states a penalty in older drafting
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- Poisons (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Firearms, offensive weapons, explosives and poisonsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 1976