UK Offence Report

The Armed Forces (Alcohol Limits for Prescribed Safety-Critical Duties) Regulations 2013

UK Statutory Instrument 2013 No. 2787 — creates 3 criminal offences.

3offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
11 September 2013
In force from
1 November 2013
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Alcohol licensing, gambling, smoke-free and public health
Made under
Armed Forces Act 2006, In accordance with section 373(3)(d) of the Armed Forces Act 2006

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

The Armed Forces Act 2006 (c. 52) (“the 2006 Act”) creates a power to test for drugs and alcohol in relation to the performance of safety-critical duties, and section 20A of the 2006 Act makes it an offence to have more than a prescribed level of alcohol in the body when a person is performing or might reasonably expect to be called on to perform a prescribed safety-critical duty. Regulation 3 prescribes higher and lower limits for alcohol in breath, blood and urine. Regulation 4 prescribes the duties which are subject to the higher alcohol limit, and regulation 5 prescribes the duties which are subject to the lower alcohol limit. Under section 93F of the 2006 Act a person who has provided a specimen of breath for testing may require it to be replaced with a blood or urine specimen, if the specimen of breath contains no more than a prescribed proportion of alcohol. Regulation 6 prescribes the proportion of alcohol. The proportion prescribed depends on the offence for which the person suspected is being tested.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source