UK Offence Report

The Export Control (Democratic Republic of Congo) Order 2005

UK Statutory Instrument 2005 No. 1677 — creates 4 criminal offences.

4offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
23 June 2005
In force from
27 June 2005
Extent
Not stated
Subject
International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
Made under
Export Control Act 2002

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

This Order makes provision in respect of the Democratic Republic of Congo in consequence of Council Regulation (EC) No 889/2005 of 13 June 2005 (“the Regulation”) which replaces and repeals Council Regulation (EC) No 1727/2003 (“the 2003 Regulation”). This Order revokes the Democratic Republic of Congo (Financing and Financial Assistance and Technical Advice, Assistance and Training) Penalties and Licences Regulations 2004 which made provision in relation to the 2003 Regulation. The Order also provides that breaches of certain provisions of the Regulation are to be criminal offences. Articles 3 and 4 of this Order create offences in respect of the provisions of Article 2 of the Regulation. Article 5 provides for the licensing of transactions set out in article 3 of the Order. Articles 6 and 7 provide penalties in respect of criminal offences created by the Order and for their enforcement. A full regulatory impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument, as it has no impact on the costs of business.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source