UK Offence Report

The Plant Health (Phytophthora ramorum) (England) (No. 2) Order 2002

UK Statutory Instrument 2002 No. 2573 — creates 4 criminal offences.

4offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
11 October 2002
In force from
1 November 2002
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
Made under
Plant Health Act 1967

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

This Order implements Commission Decision 2002/757/EC of 19th September 2002 (OJ L. 252, 20.9.2002, p.37) in England insofar as it relates to plants other than forest trees. It revokes the Plant Health (Phytophthora ramorum) (England) Order 2002 (SI 2002/1299) (article 15). The Order prohibits the introduction and spread of the plant pest, Phytophthora ramorum, a fungus identified as causing Sudden Oak Death syndrome in certain species of oak in the USA and harm to other plant species, including Rhododendron and Viburnum (article 3). It controls the importation of plants of a number of susceptible species from the USA, requiring such material to be accompanied by phytosanitary certificates which may be issued only after specific checks have been carried out during production and before consignment; or alternatively, where the material originates in a part of the USA recognised by plant health authorities as free from the pest, confirming that fact (article 4 and Schedule 1). Material despatched from the USA before 1st November 2002 is not subject to this Order (article 6), but the controls of the revoked Phytophthora ramorum Order will continue to apply to the susceptible material (as defined in that Order) which was despatched from the USA before 1st November 2002 and which enters England after 1st November 2002 (article 15). Imports of Rhododendron and Viburnum from other countries outside of the European Community (“the EC”) apart from the USA are also controlled in that such material must have a plant passport when it is moved within England or elsewhere in the EC (article 5). Plants of Rhododendron and Viburnum produced in England or originating anywhere else in the EC (which includes for these purposes, the Channel Islands and Isle of Man), must be accompanied by a plant passport when they are moved, and are subject to further controls on their movement (article 7 and Schedule 2). The Order requires producers of Rhododendron and Viburnum in England wishing to move such material to be registered if they are not already registered under the principal Plant Health Order (the Plant Health (Great Britain) Order 1993, as amended) (article 8). Provisions similar to those in the principal Plant Health Order apply to authorisations to registered traders to enable them to issue plant passports under the supervision of Defra, as the official plant health service in England (article 9). There are some exceptions to the movement restrictions in the case of persons not acting in the course of a trade, business or undertaking, and there is provision (article 12) for licensed importation, movement and keeping of the prohibited pest for research purposes. Plant Health Inspectors' enforcement powers are provided for in article 13, and offences similar to those created in the principal Order are created in respect of the production of plant passports pursuant to this Order. Offences are also created in respect of the spread of the pest and compliance with the key provisions of the Order (article 14). A regulatory impact assessment of the plant passporting measures implemented in this Order has been carried out and is available from Plant Health Division, DEFRA, Foss House, King’s Pool, Peasholme Green, York YO1 7PX.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source