UK Offence Report

The Veal (Marketing Payment) Regulations 1997

UK Statutory Instrument 1997 No. 1986 — creates 2 criminal offences.

2offences created
0recorded in force
0revoked
Made
13 August 1997
In force from
15 August 1997
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
Made under
European Communities Act 1972

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These Regulations provide for payments by the appropriate Minister (defined in regulation 2) to producers in the United Kingdom in pursuance of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No. 2443/96 (OJ No. L333, 21.12.96, p.2),, which permits Member States to make additional payments to producers in the beef and veal sector. Payment may be made in respect of a veal calf sold after 19th March 1996 and before 10th November 1996 for slaughter for human consumption, provided that no payment was made under the Beef (Marketing Payment) Regulations 1996 or the Beef (Marketing Payment) (No. 2) Regulations 1996 in respect of that calf. Regulation 5 requires a producer who has made an application under the Regulations to retain for four years specified records relating to the animals in respect of which he made the application. Regulation 6 confers on authorised persons powers of entry and inspection as well as powers of seizure and retention of records, and regulation 7 requires that such assistance as may be reasonably requested by authorised persons be given by applicants for payments and their employees and agents. Regulation 8 specifies the circumstances in which payments made to a producer may be recovered by the appropriate Minister and regulation 9 provides for the payment of interest on overdue payments. Regulation 10 creates offences and prescribes penalties. Regulation 11 specifies time limits for bringing prosecutions and regulation 12 makes provision for dealing with offences committed by corporate bodies and Scottish partnerships.

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source