The Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) Order 1993
UK Statutory Instrument 1993 No. 1813 — creates 3 criminal offences.
- Made
- 16 July 1993
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
- Made under
- Minister by section 11 of the Channel Tunnel Act 1987
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Order) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
This Order gives qualified effect in United Kingdom law to material provisions (set out in Schedule 2) of the Protocol mentioned in article 1. Those provisions (“the international articles”) are by article 3(1) given the force of law in the United Kingdom within, and for the purposes specified in article 2(2) outside, the tunnel system as defined in the Channel Tunnel Act 1987 and the control zone accorded to France by the international articles (“the French control zone”); article 3(2) affirms that French officers may to the extent specified in the international articles go about their business (essentially, the operation of French frontier controls as defined in the international articles) in the United Kingdom, and article 3(3) ensures that they can be provided with the necessary facilities.Article 4(1), by extending relevant enactments to the control zone accorded to the United Kingdom in France (“the United Kingdom control zone”), performs the corresponding operation for British officers working there.Article 4(2) and (3) alters the application of the Data Protection Act 1984 so that related computer operations carried out by British officers in the United Kingdom control zone are, but French computer operations in the French control zone are not, subject to that Act. Article 5(1) and (2) extends English criminal jurisdiction to conduct in the United Kingdom control zone which, if taking place in England, would constitute an offence under a frontier control enactment as defined in Schedule 1. Article 5(3) creates a presumption as to jurisdiction over offences committed in the tunnel system where it is uncertain on which side of the frontier they were committed. Articles 6, 7(1), 8 and 9 give effect, respectively, to Schedules 3, 4, 5 and 6. Article 7(2) and (3) modifies the Firearms Act 1968 (c. 27) so as to implement rights to carry arms accorded by the international articles to French officers. The definitions in Schedule 1 are of expressions of which some occur both in the body of the Order and in enactments as modified by the Order, some only in the latter (see article 2(1)). The international articles referred to above are set out in Schedule 2. In Part I of Schedule 3, paragraph 1 enables constables and customs officers to assist French officers by taking into temporary custody persons arrested by the latter in the French control zone.Paragraph 2 extends powers of arrest to the United Kingdom control zone; paragraph 3 authorises the detention there of persons arrested, so far as permitted by the international articles, and contains provision as to their treatment while detained.Paragraphs 4 to 6 contain provision as to the determination of national jurisdiction in certain cases and related provision as to the treatment of persons in custody. Part II of Schedule 3 implements obligations assumed by the United Kingdom to make provision to prevent animals from straying into the Fixed Link and to require the tunnel Concessionaires to take all appropriate measures (corresponding obligations are assumed by France). Schedule 4, with article 7(1), modifies the Immigration Act 1971 (c. 77) (“the 1971 Act”), the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 (c. 22) and the Prevention of Terrorism (Temporary Provisions) Act 1989 (c. 4) (“the 1989 Act”) in their Channel Tunnel application, adapting to rail traffic passing through the tunnel system control provisions framed in terms of movements by sea and air. In Part I of Schedule 5 the amendments to the 1971 Act and the 1989 Act, with the partial repeals in Part I of Schedule 6, cancel amendments made to those Acts by the Channel Tunnel (Fire Services, Immigration and Prevention of Terrorism) Order 1990 (S.I.1990/2227).The amendment to the Animal Health Act 1981 (c. 22) is consequential upon provision made in Part II of Schedule 5, which amends a number of instruments, in particular the Channel Tunnel (Customs and Excise) Order 1990 (S.I.1990/2167).The effect of that Order as amended is to adapt provisions of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2) to Channel Tunnel rail traffic. The revocations in Part II of Schedule 6 are of provisions which have become spent or have been replaced as a result of provision made in this Order.
Offences created by this instrument
- SCHEDULE 2 SCHEDULE 2 · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Powers of arrest outside United Kingdom paragraph 2(3) of SCHEDULE 3 · Status not determined · Strict liability
- A person who contravenes any of paragraphs 3 to 6 or obstructs the exercise of powers by an authorised person under… paragraph 8 of SCHEDULE 3 · Status not determined · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Contributions, debates and written statements mentioning this instrument by name. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) Order 1993 Lords · Lords Chamber · 5 July 1993
- Channel Tunnel (Security) Order 1994
Lords · Lords Chamber · 3 March 1994 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department of Transport (Lord Mackay of Ardbrecknish)
rose to move, That the draft order laid before the House on 31st January be approved [7th Report from the Joint Committee]. The noble Lord said: My Lords, many of your Lordships will recall last year the House approving the Channel Tunnel (International Arrangements) Order 1993. That order gave effect to the Sangatte protocol between the United Kingdom and French Governments concerning frontier controls and policing, co-operation in criminal justice and certain other matters, and it modified the Immigration Act 1971 in order to apply it to the Channel Tunnel. The purpose of the order we are…
- Police Restructuring
Commons · Commons Chamber · 19 December 2005 · Mr. Roger Gale (North Thanet) (Con)
Once again, I place on the record the fact that this is not the debate that the House wanted. On 29 November, there was a debate in Westminster Hall, and it is because of pressure arising from that, and only from that, that we are having this debate on the day before the House rises for Christmas, and with no vote. Given the importance of the issue to all our constituents, the House and the public can only regard that as a disgrace. When the Minister replies to the debate, I hope that she will say that in the light of representations that may or may not be made by 23 December, there will be…
- Immigration: Eurostar
Lords · Written Statements · 8 October 2007 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Home Office (Lord West of Spithead)
My honourable friend the Minister of State for Borders and Immigration and Minister for the West Midlands (Liam Byrne) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. I am today announcing changes to juxtaposed control zones for the new Eurostar terminals at St Pancras and Ebbsfleet International. Juxtaposed controls have been highly successful in reducing the dangerous and illegal crossing of the Channel. The changes in location of the control zone from Waterloo to St Pancras and a new zone at Ebbsfleet International will take place when Eurostar moves its operations in November. In…
- Juxtaposed Control Zones, Eurostar Terminals
Commons · Written Statements · 8 October 2007 · The Minister for Borders and Immigration (Mr. Liam Byrne)
I am today announcing changes to juxtaposed control zones for the new Eurostar Terminals at St. Pancras and Ebbsfleet International. Juxtaposed controls have been highly successful in reducing the dangerous and illegal crossing of the Channel. The changes in location of the control zone from Waterloo to St. Pancras and a new zone at Ebbsfleet International will take place when Eurostar moves its operations in November. In line with the Government’s strategic objective to strengthen our borders, this will allow us to continue work jointly with our French and Belgian partners to protect our…
- Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) (Amendment) Order 2011
Lords · Grand Committee · 12 July 2011 · Lord De Mauley
My Lords, I shall also speak to the Immigration (Provision of Physical Data) (Amendment) Regulations 2011. We are committed to delivering a safe and secure set of Olympic and Paralympic Games in 2012. As part of this pledge the UK Border Agency will operate a proportionate level of its usual security checks on those taking part, supporting and helping to deliver the Olympic and Paralympic Games, who are commonly collectively referred to as Games family members. Games family members are athletes, coaches, support staff, umpires, technical staff, media personnel and other individuals…
- Changes in Immigration Rules
Commons · Written Statements · 10 October 2011 · The Minister for Immigration (Damian Green)
The Government are today laying before the House a statement of changes in the immigration rules. The first change will allow the UK Border Agency to refuse entry or stay in the UK to those subject to immigration control with outstanding unpaid NHS charges of £1,000 or more. This change will be phased in from 1 November. On 18 March 2011, I announced the Government’s response to the 2010 consultation on refusing entry of stay to NHS debtors and signalled my intention to lay a new rules change in respect of outstanding NHS charges. This will deter overseas visitors from misusing the NHS and…
- Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (Juxtaposed Controls) (Amendment) Order 2021
Lords · Lords Chamber · 2 March 2021 · Lord Paddick (LD) [V]
My Lords, I thank the Minister for explaining these amendments. This has been an extremely wide-ranging debate. If I have understood the Minister correctly, powers are given to United Kingdom officials in control zones in northern France, Belgium and Holland, and to French, Belgian and Dutch officials at Channel Tunnel control zones in the UK, to enable the enforcement of immigration law at the border before passengers enter the destination country. These powers include arrest, detention and the seizure of documents, and for offences committed in control zones to be treated as if they had…
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 1993