UK Offence Report

The Butter Subsidy (Protection of Community Arrangements) Regulations 1984

UK Statutory Instrument 1984 No. 1739 — creates 2 criminal offences.

2offences created
0recorded in force
2revoked
Made
5 November 1984
In force from
28 November 1984
Extent
Not stated
Subject
Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
Made under
European Communities Act 1972

Explanatory note

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

These regulations replace with amendments and extend, provisions previously made, and now revoked, for the purpose of implementing Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1269/79 as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1362/80, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 854/81, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1186/82, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1208/83 and Council Regulation (EEC) No. 862/84 on the marketing of reduced-price butter of Community origin for direct consumption. The regulations apply not only to Community butter but to New Zealand butter imported into the United Kingdom pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No. 3667/83, as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No. 551/84, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 864/84, Council Regulation (EEC) No. 1384/84 and Council Regulation (EEC) No. 2007/84. The regulations— (a) prohibit the use for manufacture of all subsidized butter (regulation 2); (b) make provision for the recovery of subsidy paid on all subsidized butter exported from the United Kingdom or used for manufacture (regulation 3); (c) require records to be kept and information to be furnished about exports of subsidized butter (regulation 4). Certain trade in New Zealand butter is prohibited by virtue of Article 6 of Regulation 3667/83. Penalties for exportation in contravention of a prohibition are governed by section 68 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (c. 2).

Offences created by this instrument

What Parliament said about it

Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.

How Parliament handled it

Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.

Check the source