The Food (Figs, Hazelnuts and Pistachios from Turkey) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) (No. 2) Regulations 2002
Scottish Statutory Instrument 2002 No. 424 — creates 3 criminal offences.
- Made
- 12 September 2002
- In force from
- 13 September 2002
- Extent
- Not stated
- Subject
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
- Made under
- European Communities Act 1972
Explanatory note
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — published with the instrument by the department that made it. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
These Regulations revoke and re-enact with amendments the Food (Figs, Hazelnuts and Pistachios from Turkey) (Emergency Control) (Scotland) Regulations 2002. The revocation is effected by regulation 7. The Regulations implement Commission Decision 2002/80/EC imposing special conditions on the import of figs, hazelnuts and pistachios and certain products derived from figs, hazelnuts and pistachios originating in, or consigned from Turkey (O.J. No. L 34, 5.2.02, p.26) as amended by Commission Decision 2002/233/EC (O.J. No. L 78, 21.03.02, p.14) and by Commission Decision 2002/679/EC (O.J. No. L 229, 27.8.02, p.37). The Regulations– a prohibit the importation of Turkish figs, hazelnuts and pistachios (as defined in regulation 2(1)) which left Turkey on or after 11th March 2002, except where they are accompanied by Turkish Government health certificates and the results of official sampling and analysis, the importation takes place only through specified points of entry and the consignment is identified with a code corresponding with that specified on the health certificate and in the sampling and analysis results (regulations 2 and 3); b prohibit the importation of Turkish figs, hazelnuts and pistachios which left Turkey before 11th March 2002 and which are not accompanied by the documentation otherwise required, except where the importation takes place through a specified point of entry and the operator can show, by sampling and analysis of the consignment in the prescribed manner, that it does not contain aflatoxin B1 or total aflatoxin above the legally prescribed maximum levels (regulations 2 and 3); c provide for their enforcement (regulation 4); d apply, with modifications, provisions of the Food Safety Act 1990 (regulation 5); and e provide for re-dispatch or destruction of illegal imports of Turkish figs, hazelnuts and pistachios (regulation 6). The principal changes effected by these Regulations are that– a the definition of Turkish figs, hazelnuts and pistachios is amended to remove fresh figs and include fig paste and hazelnut paste; b the previous requirement that consignments of Turkish figs, hazelnuts and pistachios be subjected random sampling and analysis in order to ensure compliance with Commission Decision 2002/80/EC is modified by providing that– i only approximately 10% of such consignments be so subjected; ii consignments so subjected must be detained for that purpose; iii the period of detention must not exceed 10 working days; and iv an authorised officer of a food authority must issue a notice in writing stating that sampling has taken place and the results of the analysis of the sample; c the sampling procedure for hazelnuts is modified; and d an authorised officer of a food authority is empowered (subject to a right of appeal to a sheriff) to issue a notice ordering the re-dispatch or destruction of illegal imports of Turkish figs, hazelnuts and pistachios. No regulatory impact assessment has been prepared in relation to these Regulations.
Offences created by this instrument
- Prohibition on import regulation 3(4) · Status not determined · Requires proof of a state of mind
- Prohibition on import regulation 3(5) · Status not determined · Strict liability
- Re-dispatch or destruction of illegal imports regulation 6(9) · Status not determined · Strict liability
What Parliament said about it
Hansard was searched for this instrument by name and returned nothing. That is the ordinary outcome: an instrument laid under the negative procedure is usually never debated, and becomes law without a word said about it in either House.
How Parliament handled it
Parliament's Statutory Instruments service records procedure from May 2017 onwards, and this instrument predates it. That is a limit of the source, not a statement that nothing happened.
Check the source
- This instrument on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text, including amendments made since
- Other instruments from 2002