Refusal to provide drugs or appliances ordered
paragraph 8(2) of SCHEDULE 6 of The National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Wales) Regulations 2013 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Education, social security, pensions and public services
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
2 A dispensing doctor may refuse to provide the drugs or appliances ordered on
a prescription form or repeatable prescription, or which he or she is otherwise authorised or required to provide by virtue of regulation 20, where—
a the dispensing doctor or other persons on the premises are subjected to or threatened with violence by the person presenting the prescription or repeatable prescription, or by any person accompanying that person; or
b the person presenting the prescription form or repeatable prescription, or any other person accompanying that person, commits or threatens to commit
a criminal offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to do something the instrument requires
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach paragraph 8(2) of SCHEDULE 6?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Not doing what the provision requires under the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Wales) Regulations 2013, by the time it requires it to be done.
- Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 17 April 2013
- In force from
- 10 May 2013
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations revoke and replace the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992 (S.I.1992/662) (as amended) (“the 1992 Regulations”) as the Regulations which, in Wales, govern the provision of pharmaceutical services as part of the National Health Service under Part 7 of the National Health Service (Wales) Act 2006. Part 1 contains introductory provisions. Part 2 sets out the requirements for each Local Health Board to prepare and maintain for their area— a pharmaceutical lists of NHS pharmacists and NHS appliance contractors who undertake to provide pharmaceutical services from premises in the area; and b dispensing doctor lists of doctors who undertake to provide pharmaceutical services from premises in the area. It also sets out the terms of service, which are the terms on which persons are included in a pharmaceutical or dispensing doctor list and on which they undertake to provide pharmaceutical services as part of the National Health Service. Part 3 makes provision for a Local Health Board itself, or on application from a Local Medical Committee or Local Pharmaceutical Committee, to determine whether or not a particular area within the area for which the Local Health Board is established is, because it is rural in character, a controlled locality or part of a controlled locality. The significance of a locality being determined to be a controlled locality is that, in certain circumstances, doctors can provide pharmaceutical services to certain of their eligible patients (if those doctors are included in a dispensing doctor list). The procedures that a Local Health Board must follow in determining a question as to whether an area is a controlled locality or part of a controlled locality are set out in Schedule 2 to the Regulations. Rights of appeal to the Welsh Ministers in respect of decisions made by Local Health Boards are set out in Schedule 3. Part 4 sets out the types of applications in respect of inclusion in or amendment to pharmaceutical lists and the tests which a Local Health Board must apply to determine those applications. Under regulation 8 (applications to be included in or for amendment to a pharmaceutical list) and regulation 12 (applications for preliminary consent and effect of preliminary consent) applications can be granted only if the Local Health Board is satisfied that it is necessary or expedient to grant the application to secure in the neighbourhood in which the premises specified in the application are located, the adequate provision of all or some of the services specified in the application (the necessary or expedient test). In addition, the general position is that if the premises are situated in a controlled locality, the Local Health Board must be satisfied that to grant the application will not prejudice the proper provision of primary medical, dispensing or pharmaceutical services in any locality (the prejudice test). The exception to the general position is where the premises specified in an application are determined, by the Local Health Board, to be in a reserved location (under regulation 11 (locations in controlled localities that are reserved locations)). Certain applications regarding pharmaceutical lists are not assessed in accordance with the necessary or expedient test or the prejudice test. A person already included in a pharmaceutical list can apply to relocate the premises from which he or she provides pharmaceutical services where the move can be considered to be a minor relocation. Regulation 13 (applications involving minor relocation within a Local Health Board’s area) sets out when a Local Health Board must grant such an application. Similarly, applications that fall within regulation 14 (applications involving minor relocation between neighbouring Local Health Board areas), regulation 15 (applications involving a temporary relocation) and regulation 16 (applications involving a change of ownership) are not assessed in accordance with the necessary or expedient test or the prejudice test. The procedures that a Local Health Board must follow in determining applications under Part 4 are set out in Schedule 2 to the Regulations, and rights of appeal to the Welsh Ministers in respect of decisions made by Local Health Boards are set out in Schedule 3. Part 5 sets out the applications which doctors can make in order to be able to fulfil the conditions on which they can then make arrangements with a Local Health Board to provide pharmaceutical services to their eligible patients in controlled localities. Doctors must apply for outline consent and premises approval under regulation 24 (outline consent and premises approval) and Local Health Boards must consider such applications in accordance with the necessary or expedient test, the prejudice test and the proximity of the premises from which the doctor wishes to provide pharmaceutical services to nearby pharmacies. A doctor who has been granted outline consent and premises approval may make arrangements with a Local Health Board to provide pharmaceutical services under regulation 20 (arrangements for the provision of pharmaceutical services by doctors). The procedures that a Local Health Board must follow in determining applications under Part 5 are set out in Schedule 2 to the Regulations, and rights of appeal to the Welsh Ministers in respect of decisions made by Local Health Boards are set out in Schedule 3. Part 6 deals with fitness grounds and inclusion in and removal from pharmaceutical lists. It provides for the deferral and refusal of applications for inclusion in a pharmaceutical list on fitness grounds (regulations 31 and 32) together with an inclusion in a pharmaceutical list being subject to conditions (regulation 33). For certain fitness matters, including where a person has been convicted in the United Kingdom of a criminal offence and has been sentenced to a term of imprisonment of over six months, a Local Health Board must remove a person from a pharmaceutical list pursuant to regulation 35 (removal from a pharmaceutical list for other reasons). Part 7 deals with payments to NHS pharmacists and NHS appliance contractors. Regulation 41 (the Drug Tariff and remuneration of NHS pharmacists and NHS appliances contractors) provides for the publication of the Drug Tariff, the main statement of the financial entitlements of NHS pharmacists and NHS appliances contractors that sets out the determinations on such matters made by the Welsh Ministers as determining authority. Regulation 42 (Local Health Boards as determining authorities) makes provision for the Local Health Boards to be determining authorities where this is set out in the Drug Tariff. There are also provisions for supplemental matters including overpayments and payments to NHS pharmacists and NHS appliance contractors. Part 8 deals with miscellaneous matters, including transitional provisions for applications and appeals made under the 1992 Regulations before these Regulations come into force. The Welsh Ministers' Code of Practice on the carrying out of Regulatory Impact Assessments was considered in relation to these Regulations. As a result, a regulatory impact assessment has been prepared as to the likely costs and benefits of complying with these Regulations. A copy can be obtained from the Department for Health, Social Services and Children, Welsh Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Refusal to provide appliances orderedparagraph 8(1) of SCHEDULE 5
- Refusal to provide appliances orderedparagraph 8(1)(d) of SCHEDULE 5
- Refusal to provide drugs or appliances orderedparagraph 8(2)(b) of SCHEDULE 6
- Refusal to provide drugs or appliances orderedparagraph 9(1) of SCHEDULE 4
- Refusal to provide drugs or appliances orderedparagraph 9(1)(d) of SCHEDULE 4
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Wales) Regulations 2013 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Education, social security, pensions and public servicesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2013