Lights on tidal works during construction
article 47(2) of The Saundersfoot Harbour Empowerment Order 2011
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Housing, planning, heritage and land
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
2 If the Commissioners fail to comply with any direction given under paragraph (1), they are guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum and on conviction on indictment to a fine.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to comply with a notice or direction
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach article 47(2)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Being served with a notice under the Saundersfoot Harbour Empowerment Order 2011 and doing nothing by the date it specifies.
- Doing part of what the notice requires, where it required all of it.
- Disagreeing with the notice and ignoring it, rather than using whatever appeal the instrument provides.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 21 June 2011
- In force from
- 1 July 2011
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order reconstitutes Saundersfoot Harbour Commissioners as from 1 October 2011. It provides for the Saundersfoot Harbour Commissioners to consist of a body of eight Commissioners with experience in relevant matters, two of whom will be appointed by key stakeholders and six by an appointments panel. The Order— enables the Commissioners to acquire compulsorily the land and interests at Saundersfoot Harbour; modernises the Commissioners' powers to— manage and regulate the harbour, charge ship, harbour and goods dues, control works and dredging, and borrow and use money; makes new provision about the appointment and liability of the Commissioners and the manner in which they are to conduct their business; establishes an advisory committee; and revokes the current legislation regulating the harbour, the Saundersfoot Harbour Order 1958 (S.I. 1958 No. 886). Schedule 1 contains the Commissioners' declaration of acceptance of office. Schedule 2 sets out incidental provisions relating to the Commissioners. The land that may be acquired compulsorily by the Commissioners is described in Schedule 3 to this Order and shown in a plan which is set out in Schedule 4 to this Order. A map showing the limits of Saundersfoot Harbour is set out in Schedule 5 to this Order
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Obstruction of mooringsarticle 26(1)
- Immobilisation of vehicles illegally parkedarticle 32(5)
- Master of fishing vessel to report take of fisharticle 38(2)
- Restriction of works and dredgingarticle 41(4)
- Provision against danger to navigationarticle 48(2)
- Permanent lights on tidal worksarticle 51(2)
- Obstruction of officersarticle 61(1)
- Obstruction of officersarticle 61(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Saundersfoot Harbour Empowerment Order 2011 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Housing, planning, heritage and landOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2011