Refusal to provide appliances ordered
paragraph 8(1)(d) of SCHEDULE of The National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2010 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Education, social security, pensions and public services
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
d the person presenting the prescription form or repeatable prescription or requesting the provision of appliances in accordance with an electronic prescription form or electronic repeatable prescription or any other person accompanying that person, commits or threatens to commit
a criminal offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach paragraph 8(1)(d) of SCHEDULE?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2010.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 18 March 2010
- In force from
- 1 April 2010
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make amendments to the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992 (“the principal Regulations”) in respect of the terms of service for pharmacists and suppliers of appliances. Regulation 2 of the Regulations amends certain definitions and inserts new definitions into regulation 2(1) of the principal Regulations. Regulation 3 of the Regulations contains amendments to the terms of service for pharmacists, which are set out in Schedule 2 to the principal Regulations. Regulation 4 of the Regulations removes certain definitions in paragraph 1(2) of Schedule 2 which have been amended and are now in regulation 2(1) of the principal Regulations. Regulation 5 of the Regulations amends paragraph 6 of Schedule 2 so as to add appliances to the items that can, if certain conditions are met, be dispensed without a prescription by a pharmacist in an urgent case — and to remove the requirement that the prescriber be personally known to the pharmacist. Regulation 6 of the Regulations amends paragraph 9 of Schedule 2 so that pharmacists providing an appliance on a repeat prescription must satisfy themselves that there has been no change in a patient’s use of the appliance which calls for a review of treatment. Regulation 7 of the Regulations adds to paragraph 10 of Schedule 2 a number of additional activities that must be carried out by a pharmacist when dispensing appliances. Regulation 8 of the Regulations inserts a new paragraph 10A into Schedule 2 setting out what pharmacists must do when dispensing “specified appliances”. They must provide a home delivery service for these appliances and must ensure that appropriate advice is given as to their use. Regulation 9 of the Regulations amends paragraph 18 of Schedule 2 to require pharmacists to refer prescription forms or repeatable prescriptions, or to give contact details of other pharmacists or suppliers of appliances, in any case where providing a particular appliance or providing stoma appliance customisation is not within their normal course of business. Regulation 10 of the Regulations inserts sub-paragraph (1A) into paragraph 21 of Schedule 2 in relation to supplementary opening hours. Regulation 11 of the Regulations amends paragraph 25 of Schedule 2 in relation to clinical effectiveness programmes. Regulation 12 of the Regulations inserts a new paragraph 24A into Schedule 2 in respect of emergency opening hours. Regulation 13 of the Regulations amends paragraph 27 of Schedule 2 to prohibit gifts or rewards where a pharmacist provides no additional services other than referring a prescription onward or providing contact details of persons who are able to provide a particular service. Regulation 14 of the Regulations amends paragraph 42 of Schedule 2 to ensure that Local Health Boards can check on arrangements concerning the provision of appliances which are made between a pharmacist and a third party. Regulation 15 of the Regulations and the Schedule inserts a new Schedule 2A in to the principal Regulations in relation to terms of service for suppliers of appliances. Regulation 16 of the Regulations contains transitional provision allowing existing contractors to choose, until the end of 31 December 2010, to comply with the previous version of their terms of service, as set out in the relevant Schedule to the principal Regulations.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Refusal to provide appliances orderedparagraph 8(1) of SCHEDULE
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2010 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Education, social security, pensions and public servicesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2010