Powers of entry and default powers
regulation 29(8) of The Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (Wales) Regulations 2007
- Revoked
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Either way
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairs
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
8 A person who intentionally obstructs or impedes any person acting in the exercise of the powers conferred by this regulation or who fails without reasonable excuse to comply with
a request made under paragraph (7) is guilty of an offence and is liable on summary conviction to
a fine not exceeding level
5 on the standard scale.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- obstructing an official exercising a power
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- An element of the offence, for the prosecution to prove
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (intentionally).
“Without reasonable excuse” here is an element of the offence rather than a defence, so its absence is for the prosecution to prove (R v Charles [2009] EWCA Crim 1570).
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: intentionally; qualified by reasonable excuse (an element; prosecution disproves once raised).
The defence, as drafted
ise of the powers conferred by this regulation or who fails without reasonable excuse to comply with a request made under paragraph (7) is guilty of an offence and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale.
What would breach regulation 29(8)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Refusing to let an inspector onto premises they are entitled to enter under the Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (Wales) Regulations 2007.
- Sending an official away, or telling staff to say nothing, where the power being exercised does not depend on anyone's consent.
- Physically blocking an examination, or removing something an officer has said they intend to inspect.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2007-10-31); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Animal cruelty: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2017
Covers cruelty to and neglect of animals, and the associated disqualification and deprivation orders.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (Wales) Regulations 2017
- Revoked on
- 16 May 2017
- Made
- 8 October 2007
- In force from
- 31 October 2007
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations primarily implement Council Directive 85/337/EEC (OJ No. L175, 5.7.85, p40) on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (as last amended by Directive 2003/35/EC) (OJ No. L156, 25.6.03, p17) (“the EIA Directive”) in relation to two types of project in paragraph 1 of Annex II to that Directive: projects for the restructuring of rural land holdings, and semi-natural areas for intensive agricultural purposes. They also implement Council Directive 1992/43/EEC (OJ No. L206, 22.7.1992, p7) on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild flora and fauna (as last amended by the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the new member States) (OJ No. L236, 23.9.2003, p.667-70. See Annex II:16. Environment, C Nature protection.) (“the Habitats Directive”) insofar as those projects affect sites protected by that Directive. Regulation 3 sets out the types of projects which are excluded from the scope of the Regulations. These include works which are covered by equivalent regulatory regimes covering forestry, water management and land drainage projects, the removal of hedgerows, the erection of buildings and fences and other work on common land, and the planning system. It also gives the Welsh Ministers the power to exclude certain projects from the scope of the Regulations in accordance with the EIA and Habitats Directives. Regulation 4 prohibits any person from beginning or carrying out a uncultivated land project unless that person has obtained a screening decision (a decision on whether the project is likely to have significant effects on the environment). It prohibits any person from beginning or carrying out a restructuring project unless that person has obtained a screening decision allowing the project to go ahead, or the extent of the project falls below the threshold applicable to it. Regulation 5 and Schedule 1 set out how to calculate the appropriate threshold for a restructuring project. Regulation 6 sets out what must be included in an application for a screening decision, and allows the Welsh Ministers to ask for further information if necessary. Regulation 7 and Schedule 2 set out the factors to be taken into consideration by the Welsh Ministers when they make a screening decision, and the procedures relating to screening decision. Schedule 2 is based on Annex III to the EIA Directive. Regulation 8 prohibits a person from beginning or carrying out a project likely to have significant effects on the environment unless he or she has first obtained consent from the Welsh Ministers. Regulation 9 sets out the procedure by which the Welsh Ministers can give an applicant for consent a scoping opinion (an opinion on what information should be provided in an environmental statement). Regulation 10 sets out the duties of consultation bodies from whom information is sought in connection with a scoping opinion or an application for consent. Regulation 11 provides that applications for consent must include an environmental statement (as to the content, see the definition of “environmental statement” and Schedule 3), and sets out consultation procedures relating to the application. Regulation 12 sets out further procedures relating to any further information that is required from the applicant for consent. Regulations 13 and 14 respectively set out the procedures to be followed where a significant project in Wales might affect another EEA State, and a significant project in another EEA State might affect Wales. Regulation 15 and 16 set out the factors to be taken into consideration when the Welsh Ministers make a consent decision, including the situation where a project is likely to affect a European site, and makes provision for the timing of consent decisions. Regulation 17 sets out the conditions which must be applied to a consent and regulation 18 sets out the procedures following the consent decision. Regulation 19 makes provision on the treatment of transborder projects. Regulation 20 and Schedule 4 make specific provision for the situation where, following a grant of consent, the relevant land becomes a European site. Regulation 21 makes it an offence to begin or carry out a project without obtaining a screening decision or a consent decision (where these are required). Regulation 22 makes it an offence to breach a condition of consent. Regulation 23 makes it an offence to procure a decision by deception or to supply of false or misleading information or documents. Regulation 24 empowers the Welsh Ministers to issue “stop notices” prohibiting persons from continuing work begun without the necessary consent. Regulation 25 makes it an offence to contravene a stop notice. Regulation 26 empowers the Welsh Ministers to issue “remediation notices” requiring a person in breach of the Regulations to return his or her land to the condition it was in before the project was commenced or to good environmental condition or such standard as the Welsh Ministers determine reasonable in the circumstances. Regulation 27 makes it an offence to fail to comply with a remediation notice without reasonable excuse. Regulation 28 allows prosecutions under regulations 21, 22, 23, 25 and 27 to be brought within 6 months of the date sufficient evidence comes to the prosecutor’s knowledge. But prosecutions must be brought within 2 years of the date on which the offence is committed. Regulation 29 provides powers of entry and inspection in connection with enforcement, and allows the removal of documents and of plant and soil specimens. It permits the Welsh Ministers to carry out works required by a remediation notice which have not been done within the required timescale, and to recover the costs. It requires persons whose land is being entered and inspected to assist authorised persons, and makes it an offence intentionally to obstruct or impede them or to fail to provide them with assistance without reasonable excuse. Regulations 30 and 31 set out appeals provisions and procedures. Schedule 5 makes provision for when appeals are conducted by an appointed person. Regulations 32 and 33 respectively set out further procedures for appeals by written representations and appeals by hearing or local inquiry. Regulation 34 provides that a person aggrieved by a decisions that a project is not a significant project, or a decision granting consent for a project, may appeal to the High Court. Regulation 36 amends the Common Agricultural Policy Single Payment and Support Schemes (Cross Compliance) (Wales) Regulations 2004 (S.I. 2004/3280 (W.284)) as a consequence of the coming into force of these Regulations. Regulation 37 revokes the Environmental Impact Assessment (Uncultivated Land and Semi-Natural Areas) (Wales) Regulations 2002 (S.I 2002/2127, (W.214)) amended by S.I 2007/203 (W.17)). Regulation 38 makes transitional provision.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Any person who begins or carries out an uncultivated land project or a restructuring project — a in breach…regulation 21(1)
- Any person who carries out any activity in contravention of any condition of consent granted under these…regulation 22
- Any person who, for the purpose of procuring a particular decision on an application made under these…regulation 23(1)
- Penalties for contravention of a stop noticeregulation 25(1)
- Penalty for contravening a remediation noticeregulation 27
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”; the provision states liability on summary conviction
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Environmental Impact Assessment (Agriculture) (Wales) Regulations 2007 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Agriculture, plant health, food production and rural affairsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2007