UK Offence Report

Transport of hake

article 8 of The Sea Fishing (Northern Hake Stock) (Wales) Order 2006

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

8 Where any quantities of northern hake are transported in contravention of Article 12(2) of Regulation 811/04, the owner or hirer of, and the person responsible for, the vehicle used to transport the hake is guilty of an offence.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
an owner
Conduct
contravening a requirement of the instrument
Fault element
Mixed — some elements strict, some not
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove the conduct, and - for those elements the provision qualifies - the state of mind it names. The remaining elements carry no fault requirement, so they are strict.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: the offence itself carries no fault word, but a duty it criminalises by cross-reference uses reasonable cause to believe; which element that governs was not determined.

What would breach article 8?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Sea Fishing (Northern Hake Stock) (Wales) Order 2006, whatever the reason for doing it.
  2. Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Unlimited
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

'to a fine' with no stated maximum.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
5 July 2006
In force from
7 July 2006
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

This Order provides for the administration and enforcement in Wales of the monitoring, inspection and surveillance provisions of Council Regulation (EC) 811/2004 (OJ No L150 30.4.2004, p.1). The Order contains provisions relating to recording and accounting time spent at sea (article 3), provisions for the notification of entry into port of fishing boats and the landing of northern hake at designated ports (articles 4 and 5), a margin of tolerance relating to the recording of catches of fish in logbooks (article 6), a provision relating to the mixing of species within containers on board fishing vessels (article 7) and procedures for transporting northern hake (article 8). The Order creates offences in respect of the contravention, by the person in charge of the fishing boat (or the individuals specifically referred to) of provisions of the Regulation. The offences relate to failing to record and account for time in a log book (article 3), failing to provide certain information and/or follow the directions of a British sea-fishery officer when landing at a designated port (article 4), the failure to land in a designated port where more than two tonnes of northern hake are to be landed (article 5), the failure to comply with the 8% tolerance for logbook records relating to catches of fish (article 6), and the mixing of species and transporting of northern hake (articles 7 and 8) in a manner inconsistent with the Regulation. Articles 9-16 make provisions for enforcement. The Order provides that a person guilty of an offence other than an offence under article 15 is liable, on summary conviction, to a fine not exceeding £50,000 and on conviction on indictment to a fine. Further fines up to and including the value of any fish caught in committing the offence are permitted and the court may also order the seizure of fish caught or equipment used in, or in activities leading to, the commission of an offence (article 9). The Order also provides for the recovery of fines imposed, or treated as imposed, by a magistrates' court (article 10). For the purposes of enforcing the above provisions, the Order confers on British sea-fishery officers the power to enter premises, to go on board fishing boats, to stop and search vehicles transporting fish, to examine fish, to require the production of documents, to search for and seize documents, to take a boat to the nearest convenient port and to seize fish and fishing gear (articles 11-13). Protection of such officers from liability is set out in article 14, and obstructing them is an offence under article 15, with a fine of up to the statutory maximum on summary conviction and a fine on conviction on indictment. Articles 16 and 17 deal with corporate and equivalent offences and admissibility of documents in evidence. A Regulatory Appraisal in relation to the Annexes and this Order has been prepared and placed in the library of the National Assembly for Wales. Copies can be obtained from Fisheries Branch, National Assembly for Wales, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source