UK Offence Report

Refusal to provide drugs or appliance ordered

regulation 9(1) of The National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2005

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 A chemist may refuse to provide the drugs or appliances ordered on

a prescription form or repeatable prescription where—

a the chemist reasonably believes that it is not

a genuine order for the person named on the prescription form or the repeatable prescription (for example because he reasonably believes the form has been stolen or forged);

b it appears to the chemist that there is an error on the prescription form or on the repeatable prescription or its associated batch issue (including

a clinical error made by the prescriber) or that, in the circumstances, providing the drugs or appliances would be contrary to the chemist’s clinical judgement;

c the chemist or other persons on the premises are subjected to or threatened with violence by the person presenting the prescription form or repeatable prescription, or by any person accompanying that person; or

d the person presenting the prescription form or repeatable prescription, or any other person accompanying that person, commits or threatens to commit

a criminal offence.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
failing to do something the instrument requires
Fault element
Requires proof of a state of mind
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (believes that).

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: believes that.

What would breach regulation 9(1)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Not doing what the provision requires under the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) (Amendment) (Wales) Regulations 2005, by the time it requires it to be done.
  2. Doing it, but not in the manner or to the standard the instrument specifies.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Not determined
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
31 March 2005
In force from
1 April 2005
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations further amend the National Health Service (Pharmaceutical Services) Regulations 1992 (S.I.1992/662) (“the principal Regulations”) which govern the arrangements the provision of pharmaceutical services under the National Health Service Act 1977. The amendments made by these Regulations introduce a contractual framework for the provision of pharmaceutical services which will enable pharmacies to provide a greater range of services and to be rewarded for the range and quality of those services. Regulation 8 of these Regulations replaces Part II of the Terms of Service for Chemists which are contained within Schedule 2 to the principal Regulations with new terms of service for Chemists which are contained within Parts 2 to 5 of the substituted provision. The new terms of service introduce three tiers of pharmaceutical services: firstly, nationally set essential services, which include dispensing, repeat dispensing, clinical governance requirements and disposal of medication; secondly, advanced services, which are also nationally set and which currently comprise medicines use review and prescription intervention services; and finally, locally enhanced services, which can commissioned by Local Health Boards and the terms of which can be agreed locally. Regulation 9 substitutes a new Part 6 into Schedule 2 to the principal Regulations. This replaces, without change, the terms of services for doctors who provide pharmaceutical services. These Regulations make other amendments to the principal Regulations that are consequential upon the introduction of the new contractual framework for chemists. Regulations 11 and 12 contain transitional provisions.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person “commits an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source