UK Offence Report

Contravention of The Meat (Enhanced Enforcement Powers) (Wales) Regulations 2001

the instrument as a whole of The Meat (Enhanced Enforcement Powers) (Wales) Regulations 2001 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

Contravening this instrument is an offence under sections 10(2), 33 and 35 of the Food Safety Act 1990. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
selling or supplying something the instrument restricts
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
Not determined

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.

What would breach the instrument as a whole?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Selling the goods under the Meat (Enhanced Enforcement Powers) (Wales) Regulations 2001 where the instrument prohibits the sale outright.
  2. Supplying without carrying out a check the instrument requires first, even where the sale would otherwise be lawful.
  3. Offering for sale counts as well as selling: displaying stock is enough where the provision reaches an offer.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
Maximum fine
Not determined
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to sections 10(2), 33 and 35 of the Food Safety Act 1990.

the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
14 June 2001
In force from
17 June 2001
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations (which apply to Wales only) amend — the Fresh Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995; the Poultry Meat, Farmed Game Bird and Rabbit Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995; the Meat Products (Hygiene) Regulations 1994; the Minced Meat and Meat Preparations (Hygiene) Regulations 1995; the Meat Hygiene Appeals Tribunal (Procedure) Regulations 1992; and the Products of Animal Origin (Import and Export) Regulations 1996, in each case in their application to Wales. All of the Regulations being amended extend to the whole of Great Britain. These Regulations amend the Fresh Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/539, as amended)(“the Fresh Meat Regulations”) to provide enhanced powers of enforcement in relation to those Regulations in the light of Council Directive 64/433/EEC on health conditions for the production and marketing of fresh meat (a consolidated text of which is annexed to Council Directive 91/497/EEC (OJ No. L268, 24.9.91, p.69) and Council Directive 91/495/EEC concerning public health and animal health problems affecting the production and placing on the market of rabbit meat and farmed game meat (OJ No. L268, 24.9.91, p.41). These Regulations amend regulation 3 of the Fresh Meat Regulations (which specifies circumstances in which those Regulations do not apply) and impose new obligations on persons engaged in activities which would otherwise be exempt (regulation 2(3) and (4)). They impose revised requirements relating to the licensing of premises under the Fresh Meat Regulations. They impose a new requirement that the Food Standards Agency (“the Agency”) must be informed of changes in the identity of those having management and similar responsibilities in relation to the occupier of premises already licensed under the Fresh Meat Regulations (“licensed premises”) (regulation 2(5) to (7)). They amend the criteria under which the Agency may revoke licences granted under the Fresh Meat Regulations (regulation 2(8) and (9)). A new power to suspend licences is created (regulation 2(10)). These Regulations revise the conditions governing appeals against decisions taken by the Agency in relation to licences granted under the Fresh Meat Regulations (regulations 2(11) to (13)). Occupiers of premises currently licensed under the Fresh Meat Regulations will now have to inform the Agency of their identity and of the principal business address and identity of each of their directors, managers and controllers within 3 months of these Regulations coming into force (regulation 2(14)). A further amendment enables official veterinary surgeons to inspect records kept by the occupiers of licensed premises pursuant to regulation 20(1)(a), (e) and (f) of the Fresh Meat Regulations and to monitor compliance with their duties under regulation 20 thereof (regulation 2(15)). The powers of official veterinary surgeons set out in regulation 10 of the Fresh Meat Regulations are modified (regulation 2(16) and (17)). The general conditions for the marketing of fresh meat set out in regulation 13 of the Fresh Meat Regulations are modified (regulation 2(18) and (19)). The duties imposed on occupiers of licensed premises by regulation 20 of the Fresh Meat Regulations are modified (regulation 2(20) to (23)). The penalties for breach contained in regulation 21 of the Fresh Meat Regulations are rationalised (regulation 2(24)). Regulation 23 of the Fresh Meat Regulations is amended so that (in relation to any place other than licensed premises) the relevant food authority is made responsible for enforcement (regulation 2(25). A further amendment to Regulation 23 introduces a new power for the Agency to certify that meat has not been produced, stored or transported in accordance with the Regulations. Meat certified in this way is treated, for the purposes of section 9 of the Food Safety Act 1990 as failing to comply with food safety requirements (also regulation 2(25)), with the result that it can be seized and, potentially, disposed of. These Regulations amend the Poultry Meat, Farmed Game Bird and Rabbit Meat (Hygiene and Inspection) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/540, as amended)(“the Poultry Meat Regulations”) to provide enhanced enforcement powers in relation to these Regulations in the light of Council Directive 71/118/EEC on health problems affecting the production and placing on the market of fresh poultry meat (a consolidated text of which is annexed to Council Directive 92/116/EEC (OJ No. L62, 15.3.93, p.1) and Council Directive 91/495/EEC. In particular, these Regulations amend regulation 3 of the Poultry Meat Regulations (circumstances in which those Regulations do not apply) and impose new obligations on persons engaged in activities which would otherwise be exempt (regulation 3(3) and (4)). They impose revised requirements relating to the licensing of premises under the Poultry Meat Regulations. They impose a new requirement that the Agency must be informed of changes in the identity of those having management and similar responsibilities in relation to the occupier of premises already licensed under the Poultry Meat Regulations (“licensed poultry meat premises”) (regulation 3(5) to (7)). These Regulations amend the criteria under which the Agency may revoke licences granted under the Poultry Meat Regulations (regulation 3(8) and (9)). A new power to suspend licences is created (regulation 3(10)). These Regulations revise the conditions governing appeals against decisions taken by the Agency in relation to licences granted under the Poultry Meat Regulations (regulation 3(11) to (13)). Occupiers of premises currently licensed under the Poultry Meat Regulations will now have to inform the Agency of their identity and of the principal business address and identity of each of their directors, managers and controllers within 3 months of these Regulations coming into force (regulation 3(14)). A further amendment enables official veterinary surgeons to inspect the records required to be kept by the occupiers of licensed poultry meat premises pursuant to regulation 18(1)(a) and (e)(i) of the Poultry Meat Regulations and to monitor compliance with their duties under regulation 18 thereof (regulation 3(15)). The powers of official veterinary surgeons set out in regulation 10 of the Poultry Meat Regulations are modified (regulation 3(16) and (17)). The general conditions for the marketing of fresh meat set out in regulation 14 of the Poultry Meat Regulations are modified (regulation 3(18)). The duties imposed on occupiers of licensed poultry meat premises by regulation 18 of the Poultry Meat Regulations are modified (regulation 3(19). The penalties for breach contained in regulation 20 of the Poultry Meat Regulations are rationalised (regulation 3(20)). Regulation 23 of the Poultry Meat Regulations is amended so that (in relation to any place other than licensed premises) the relevant food authority is made responsible for enforcement of the Regulations (regulation 3(21). A further amendment to Regulation 23 introduces a new power for the Agency to certify that meat has not been produced, stored or transported in accordance with the Regulations. Meat certified in this way is treated for the purposes of section 9 of the Food Safety Act 1990 as failing to comply with food safety requirements (regulation 3(22), with the result that it can be seized and, potentially, disposed of. These Regulations amend the Meat Products (Hygiene) Regulations 1994 (SI 1994/3082, as amended) (“the Meat Products Regulations”) to provide enhanced enforcement powers in relation to these Regulations in the light of Council Directive 77/99/EEC on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in meat products (OJ No. L26, 31.1.77, p.85). In particular, these Regulations amend the definition of “combined premises” in paragraph (1) of regulation 2 (interpretation) of the Meat Products Regulations (regulation 4(3)). These Regulations amend regulation 3 of the Meat Products Regulations (circumstances in which those Regulations do not apply) and impose new obligations on persons engaged in activities which would otherwise be exempt (regulation 4(4) and (5)). They impose revised requirements relating to the approval of meat products premises. They impose a new requirement that the Agency must be informed of changes in the identity of those having management and similar responsibilities in relation to the occupier of meat products premises which have already been approved under the Meat Products Regulations (“approved meat products premises”) (regulation 4(6) to (8)). These Regulations amend the criteria under which the Agency may revoke approvals granted under the Meat Products Regulations (regulation 4(9) to (11)). A new power to suspend approvals granted under the Meat Products Regulations is created (regulation 4(12)). These Regulations revise the conditions governing appeals against decisions taken by the approval authority in relation to approvals and special hygiene directions under the Meat Products Regulations (regulation 4(13) and (14)). Occupiers of currently-approved meat products premises will now have to inform the approval authority of their identity and of the principal business address and identity of each of their directors, managers and controllers within 3 months of these Regulations coming into force (regulation 4(15)). Regulation 19 of the Meat Products Regulations (supervision and enforcement) is amended so that where any meat product is certified as provided for by new paragraph (4) or (5) thereof it is treated for the purposes of section 9 of the Food Safety Act 1990 as failing to comply with food safety requirements (regulation 4(16)), with the result that it can be seized and, potentially, disposed of. These Regulations insert a new regulation into the Meat Products Regulations (regulation 19A). This enables authorised officers of the appropriate enforcement authority to prohibit the use of equipment or any part of approved meat products premises and to regulate or prohibit the carrying on of a process (regulation 4(17)). Regulation 21 of the Meat Products Regulations (application of various sections of the Food Safety Act 1990) is amended so that section 9 thereof is, with modifications, applied to them (regulation 4(18)). These Regulations amend the Minced Meat and Meat Preparations (Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (SI 1995/3205, as amended) (“the Minced Meat Regulations”) to provide enhanced enforcement powers in relation to those Regulations in the light of of Council Directive 94/65/EEC laying down the requirements for the production and placing on the market of minced meat and meat preparations (OJ No. L368, 31.12.94, p.10). In particular, these Regulations amend the definition of “combined premises” in paragraph (1) of regulation 2 (interpretation) of the Minced Meat Regulations (regulation 5(3)). These Regulations amend regulation 3 of the Minced Meat Regulations (circumstances in which those regulations do not apply) and impose new obligations on persons engaged in activities which would otherwise give rise to an exemption (regulation 5(4) and (5)). They impose revised requirements relating to the approval of premises to be used for the production of certain minced meat or meat preparations. They impose a new requirement that the approval authority must be informed of changes in the identity of those having management and similar responsibilities in relation to premises which have already been approved under the Minced Meat Regulations (“approved minced meat premises”) (regulation 5(6) and (7)). These Regulations amend the criteria under which the approval authority may revoke approvals granted under the Minced Meat Regulations (regulation 5(8) to (10)). A new power to suspend approvals granted under the Minced Meat Regulations is created (regulation 5(11)). These Regulations revise the conditions governing appeals against decisions taken by the approval authority in relation to approvals granted under the Minced Meat Regulations (regulation 5(12) and (13)). Occupiers of currently-approved minced meat premises will now have to inform the approval authority of their identity and of the principal business address and identity of each of their directors, managers and controllers within 3 months of these Regulations coming into force (regulation 5(14)). Regulation 12 of the Minced Meat Regulations (supervision and enforcement) is amended so that where any minced meat or meat preparation is certified as provided for by new paragraph (8) or (9) thereof it is treated for the purposes of section 9 of the Food Safety Act 1990 as failing to comply with food safety requirements (regulation 5(15)), with the result that it can be seized and, potentially, disposed of. These Regulations insert a new regulation into the Minced Meat Regulations (regulation 12A). This enables authorised officers of the appropriate enforcement authority to prohibit the use of any equipment or any part of approved minced meat premises and to regulate or prohibit the carrying on of a process (regulation 5(16)). Consequential amendments are made to the Meat Hygiene Appeals Tribunal (Procedure) Regulations 1992 (S.I. 1992/2921, as already amended) (regulation 6) and the Products of Animal Origin (Import and Export) Regulations 1996 (S.I. 1996/3124, as already amended) (regulation 7). Those latter amendments are effected in reliance on section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 (1972 c. 68). A regulatory appraisal has been prepared for these Regulations and copies of the assessment can be obtained from the Food Standards Agency — Wales, 1st Floor, Southgate House, Wood Street, Cardiff CF10 1EN.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.63.

Basis
the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
Confidence
0.63 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source