UK Offence Report

Offences and penalties

regulation 26(1) of The Merchant Shipping (Polar Code) (Safety) Regulations 2021 (revoked)

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 Any contravention of— a regulation 7(8) (recording of alternative design and arrangements); b regulation 12(2)(a) (performance standards); c regulation 12(2)(b) (operational assessment); d regulation 12(2)(c) (requirement to comply with chapters 2 to 11 of part 1-A of the Polar Code) in so far as it requires a ship to comply with chapters 2 to 10 of part 1-A of the Polar Code (safety measures); e regulation 12(3) (compliance with Polar Water Operational Manual); f regulation 18(2) (requirement for survey and certification before entering polar waters); g regulation 18(3) (requirement to hold on board a valid Polar Ship Certificate); h regulation 20(2) (responsibilities of owner and master), is an offence by the owner and master of the ship in respect of each case of non-compliance.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
an owner
Conduct
contravening a requirement of the instrument
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that an owner meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach regulation 26(1)?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Merchant Shipping (Polar Code) (Safety) Regulations 2021, whatever the reason for doing it.
  2. Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
Maximum fine
Unlimited
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined
Maximum prison (on indictment)
6 months

expressed as the statutory maximum (the prescribed sum): the same words mean £5,000 in England and Wales and £10,000 in Scotland.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
13 December 2021
In force from
6 January 2022
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

These Regulations implement the requirements of Chapter XIV in the Annex to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, 1974 (“the Convention”), which incorporates the safety related requirements for ships in the International Code for Ships Operating in Polar Waters (“the Polar Code”). They apply, with certain limited exceptions, to United Kingdom ships certified in accordance with the Merchant Shipping (Survey and Certification) Regulations 2015 (S.I. 2015/508) operating in, or intending to operate in, polar waters (regulation 3). They also apply to non-United Kingdom ships with appropriate certification which commence a voyage from, or end a voyage in, a port in the United Kingdom, and as part of that voyage operate in, or intend to operate in, polar waters. Appropriate certification means the ship has been certified in accordance with Chapter I of the Convention or, in the case of a non-Convention ship, in accordance with the requirements of the State whose flag that ship is entitled to fly and which demonstrates compliance with the requirements of Chapter I. The Regulations provide for the granting of exemptions (regulation 5), approval of equivalents (regulation 6) and alternative design and arrangements for United Kingdom ships (regulation 7). The Secretary of State may also approve matters contained in the Polar Code requiring the approval of the Administration (regulation 8). Provision is made for the approval of training providers who provide courses for seafarers leading to a Certificate of Proficiency, which is required by chapter 12 of part 1-A of the Polar Code and Regulation V/4 of the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping, 1978 (regulations 9 and 10). All the safety related provisions of the Polar Code are implemented by these Regulations. The requirements for ships operating in polar waters are contained in regulation 12 and the manning and training requirements in chapter 12 of part 1-A of the Polar Code are contained in regulations 13 to 17. Regulations 18 to 24 contain provisions relating to the survey and certification procedure for a Polar Ship Certificate, including the particular responsibilities of the owner and master (regulation 20). The majority of these requirements are incorporated into the Regulations by direct reference to the requirements in the Polar Code. Future amendments to the referenced Polar Code and other Convention requirements will be automatically incorporated into the Regulations pursuant to the ambulatory reference provision in regulation 4. Regulation 25 provides for an arbitration procedure where there is a dispute in relation to a survey carried out in respect of a United Kingdom ship. The Regulations also provide for offences and penalties in the event of a contravention of the requirements of the Regulations (regulation 26). Regulation 27 provides a power for a surveyor to inspect a non-United Kingdom ship in order to verify that there is a valid certificate for operation in polar waters. In cases of non-compliance with the Regulations, a ship may also be detained (regulation 28). Regulation 29 requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of these Regulations and publish a report before 6th January 2027 and at intervals not exceeding 5 years after that. Following a review, it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether the Regulations should remain as they are, or to be amended or revoked. A further instrument would be needed to amend or revoke the Regulations. Marine Guidance Note 637(M) also provides guidance on how the Secretary of State will exercise discretion where the Polar Code permits this. Marine Guidance Note 637(M) is available from the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) of Spring Place, 105 Commercial Road, Southampton SO15 1EG (telephone 020 3817 2000 and email infoline@mcga.gov.uk) https://www.gov.uk/topic/ships-cargoes/m-notices. Merchant Shipping Notice M.1613 is also available at the same link and from the MCA. The Convention and its Protocol of 1988 may be obtained in copy from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), 4 Albert Embankment, London SE1 7SR and both are available on the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) treaties database (https://treaties.fco.gov.uk/responsive/app/consolidatedSearch). The text of the IMO Resolutions amending the Convention and Protocol may be obtained from the IMO or found in Marine Information Note 637(M), or on the FCDO treaties database (https://treaties.fco.gov.uk/responsive/app/consolidatedSearch). Future amendments to the Convention and to the Protocol may be obtained in copy from the IMO and, after coming into force in the United Kingdom, found on the FCDO treaties database (https://treaties.fco.gov.uk/responsive/app/consolidatedSearch). Until such publication is made on the FCDO treaties database, an amendment will be available from the MCA and on https://www.gov.uk. An amendment will be publicised in advance of its in-force date by means of a Parliamentary Statement to both Houses of Parliament and by way of a Marine Guidance Note, which will be available in copy from the MCA and on https://www.gov.uk. A full impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no, or no significant, impact on the private or voluntary sector is foreseen. An Explanatory Memorandum is published alongside the instrument on www.legislation.gov.uk .

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

How this became law

This instrument became law without a debate or a vote. Under the negative procedure it took effect unless a motion to stop it succeeded, and none was tabled.

Neither House could have amended it. A statutory instrument is put to each House as a whole thing, to be approved or not; the Houses can reject an instrument or record their regret, but they cannot change a word of it. That is the constitutional position for every offence on this site.

The full procedural history →

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.62.

Basis
the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
Confidence
0.62 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source