Contravention of The Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019
the instrument as a whole of The Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Set by another provision
- Road traffic and vehicles
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
Contravening this instrument is an offence under sections
5 and 17(4) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Not determined
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.
What would breach the instrument as a whole?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to sections 5 and 17(4) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984.
the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 3 September 2019
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
The Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 1) Order 2019, the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 2) Order 2019 and the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019 enable the movement of cross-Channel lorries in Kent to be controlled by regulating access to the road network, conferring new powers on traffic officers to allow for such vehicles to be detected and directed, and making ancillary provision relating to enforcement. This Order: a makes access to the coastbound carriageway of the M20 Motorway between Junctions 9 and 13 (the primary route to the Channel Tunnel at Folkestone and the Port of Dover) conditional on producing border documents (to demonstrate readiness to bring goods into a foreign country) and displaying a permit (issued after using an approved route in Kent) (article 2); b prohibits cross-Channel lorries using a contraflow on the London-bound carriageway of the M20 Motorway between Junctions 8 and 9, which is reserved for other coastbound traffic (article 3(1) and (2)); c requires the drivers of cross-Channel lorries to display a permit before entering the M20 Motorway queueing area between Junctions 8 and 9 of the coastbound carriageway if the M26 Motorway is also being used as a queueing area (article 3(3) and (4)); d amends the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 to make evidence from prescribed devices relating to breaches of the new restrictions created by this Order and the No. 2 Order, or of a direction given by a traffic officer under the No. 1 Order, more readily admissible in court through the procedure established by section 20 of that Act (article 4(2)); e designates the offence created by article 2(6) of the No. 1 Order of failing to comply with a direction given, or requirement imposed, by a traffic officer as a fixed penalty and financial penalty deposit offence (article 4(3) and (4) and article 6); and f sets the fixed penalty amount for the new offence referred to immediately above and for breaches of the restrictions created by this Order and the No. 2 Order at £300 (article 5). The restrictions imposed by articles 2 and 3, which cannot have effect after 31st December 2020, are activated through the placing of traffic signs on the coastbound carriageway of the M20 Motorway between Junctions 7 and 8. This will also activate restrictions in the No. 2 Order affecting the local road network in Kent. This Order also provides for the issuing of permits to the drivers of heavy commercial vehicles and to hauliers established in Kent, which are required to establish some of the exceptions to the restrictions imposed by this Order and the No. 2 Order (article 7). A full Impact Assessment has not been produced for this instrument as it is not expected to have significant impact on the private, public or voluntary sectors. An Explanatory Memorandum has been prepared for this Order and is available alongside this instrument on the UK Legislation website www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
How this became law
This instrument became law without a debate or a vote. Under the negative procedure it took effect unless a motion to stop it succeeded, and none was tabled.
Neither House could have amended it. A statutory instrument is put to each House as a whole thing, to be approved or not; the Houses can reject an instrument or record their regret, but they cannot change a word of it. That is the constitutional position for every offence on this site.
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Draft Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 1) Order 2019
Lords · 7 October 2019 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Transport (Baroness Vere of Norbiton) (Con)
My Lords, the draft Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 1) Order 2019 and the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 2) Order 2019, along with the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019, which requires the negative procedure, are a package of measures and it is important that they should be debated together. I am grateful to the House for facilitating this. As noble Lords will be aware, the…
-
Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 2) Order 2019
Commons · 8 October 2019 · Chris Heaton-Harris
I really hope not, too. The order is the second in a series of three, along with the draft Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 1) Order 2019 and the snappily named Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019. Order No. 1 was debated at 8.55 am today—the hon. Member for York Central and I enjoyed our 45 minutes together—but order No. 2 should be considered as part of the whole package. Together, the…
-
Draft Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 1) Order 2019
Commons · 8 October 2019 · The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Chris Heaton-Harris)
I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 1) Order 2019. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Hanson. This instrument is the first in a series of three, along with the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 2) Order 2019 and the similarly named Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019. Although order No. 2 will be debated later…
-
Road Traffic
Commons · 23 November 2020 · Rachel Maclean
I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention. He and his constituents can be assured that the powers we are taking in this legislation require Kent lorries to stick to certain specified routes only if they are crossing the border. I hope that that provides him with some reassurance; I am more than happy to meet him to discuss this matter much further. To complete the picture, the Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.59.
- Basis
- the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
- Confidence
- 0.59 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Heavy Commercial Vehicles in Kent (No. 3) Order 2019 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Road traffic and vehiclesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2019