Section 172(1) statement to be made available on website
regulation 426B(7) of The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
7 In the event of default in complying with this section, an offence is committed by every officer of the company who is in default.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a company
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a company meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 426B(7)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- £1,000
- Standard scale
- Level 3
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 17 July 2018
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make changes to the reporting requirements found in Part 15 of the Companies Act 2006 and the Large and Medium-Sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (“the 2008 Regulations”). These Regulations also amend the Community Interest Company Regulations 2005 (“the CIC Regulations”). These Regulations extend to the whole of the United Kingdom, reflecting the extent of the Companies Act 2006 and Part 2 of the Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise) Act 2004. Regulation 1 makes provision for differential commencement in relation to the provisions of these Regulations and for their application. Part 2 (regulations 3 to 6) amends the Companies Act 2006, providing a new requirement to include a statement in the strategic report on how the directors have had regard to the matters set out in section 172 of that Act in the exercise of their duties. Part 3 amends the 2008 Regulations to require companies to report additional information in the directors’ report. Regulation 8 makes consequential provision, and regulation 9 amends the review clause in the 2008 Regulations to require a review of the amendments made by these Regulations. Regulation 10 corrects definitions in Schedule 5 to the 2008 Regulations which refer to repealed legislation. This regulation will align the definitions in Schedule 5 with those in Schedule 8 of the 2008 Regulations which were previously amended, as well as the definitions used in the new Schedule 4A of the CIC Regulations inserted by regulations 20 to 23 of these Regulations. Regulation 12 aligns the formula provided in Schedule 7 to the 2008 Regulations for calculating the average number of employees with the formula used in the Companies Act 2006. Regulation 13 amends Part 4 of Schedule 7 of the 2008 Regulations to require additional reporting on a company’s engagement with its employees, and suppliers, customers and others in a business relationship, to provide further explanation on how the directors of the company have complied with the duty to have regard in section 172. Regulation 14 inserts a new Part 8 into Schedule 7 to the 2008 Regulations requiring companies which in a financial year have more than 2000 employees, or a turnover of more than £200 million and a balance sheet total of more than £2 billion, to provide a statement of corporate governance arrangements in relation to that year. Regulations 15 to 19 amend Schedule 8 to the 2008 Regulations to require additional information in the Directors’ Remuneration Report. Regulation 16 requires that the annual statement from the chair of the remuneration committee includes a summary of any discretion exercised by the remuneration committee in relation to the award of directors’ remuneration. Regulation 17 requires companies to report how much of a director’s pay award is attributable to share price growth, and extends the requirement to report on the exercise of discretion in relation to the award to specifically address whether discretion has been exercised due to changes in share price. It also places new requirements on companies with more than 250 UK employees to report pay ratio information comparing the remuneration of the CEO with the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile of the full time equivalent remuneration of the company’s UK employees. For a parent company within the meaning of the Companies Act 2006 the information must relate to the group. Regulation 18 places a new requirement for companies to include in the remuneration policy an illustration, in relation to performance measures or targets, of the maximum remuneration of directors assuming share price growth of 50% during the performance period. Regulation 19 inserts a new definition into the interpretation provision for Schedule 8. Part 4 (regulations 20 to 23) amends the CIC Regulations. These provisions remedy a gap created when Schedule 3 to the Small Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (“the Small Company Regulations”) was revoked by the Companies, Partnerships and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2015. Section 34 of the Companies, Audit, Investigations and Enterprise Act 2004 requires regulations to make provision for community interest company reports to include information about the remuneration of directors. Regulation 23 amends the CIC Regulations by inserting Schedule 4A into the CIC Regulations, the content of which is a reproduction of the revoked Schedule 3, with minor amendments to definitions to include cross-references to the appropriate legislation. A full regulatory impact assessment has not been produced in relation to Part 4 of the instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that Parts 2 and 3 of this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available from the Business Frameworks and Regional Growth Fund Directorate, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H OET or from www.gov.uk/beis, and is also available alongside this instrument at www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Draft Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018
Commons · 4 July 2018 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Andrew Griffiths)
I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Sharma, even in this somewhat sticky weather. The UK has an international reputation for the strength of its corporate governance framework, which gives us a competitive advantage and is important in making the UK an attractive place to work, invest…
-
Business without Debate
Commons · 9 July 2018 · Mr Deputy Speaker (Sir Lindsay Hoyle)
With the leave of the House, I will put motions 5 to 8 together. Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 118(6)), Financial Services and Markets That the draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) (Amendment) Order 2018, which was laid before this House on 9 May, be approved. Banks and Banking That the draft Electronic Presentment of Instruments (Evidence of Payment and…
-
Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018
Lords · 9 July 2018 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Lord Henley) (Con)
My Lords, I beg to move that the draft Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018, which were laid before the House on 11 June, be approved. The United Kingdom has an international reputation for the strength of its corporate governance framework. It is an important factor in making the United Kingdom an attractive place in which to invest and do business. One of the reasons we have maintained this…
- Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 Lords · 9 July 2018
Other offences in the same instrument
- In the event of default in complying with this paragraph, an offence is committed by every officer of the…regulation 14
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.55.
- Basis
- c06_offence_committed
- Confidence
- 0.55 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2018