Failure to publish a report
regulation 8(1) of The Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Summary only
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 If the requirements of regulation
3 are not met in relation to
a reporting period, the qualifying company and every person who was
a director of the qualifying company immediately before the end of the filing period commits an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 8(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a person was a director of the qualifying company immediately before the end of the filing period.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
- Maximum fine
- Unlimited
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
level 5 is unlimited in England and Wales for offences committed on or after 12 March 2015 (LASPO 2012 s.85, S.I. 2015/664).
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 15 March 2017
- In force from
- 6 April 2017
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations require a company to which the Regulations apply to publish certain information about the company’s payment practices and policies and its performance by reference to those practices and policies. Regulation 1(3) provides that these Regulations are to cease to have effect on 6th April 2024. Regulation 2 sets out the definitions used in the Regulations. Regulation 3 imposes a duty on a qualifying company to publish, for each reporting period, information on its payment practices and policies in relation to qualifying contracts and its performance in relation to those practices and policies. The Schedule sets out the information that is required in relation to each reporting period. The information must be published on a web-based service provided by or on behalf of the Secretary of State. Regulation 4 provides that the information must be approved by a director of the qualifying company. Regulation 5 defines which companies are qualifying companies. A company will be a qualifying company in relation to a financial year, if on the balance sheet dates for the two preceding financial years it exceeded certain thresholds in the Companies Act 2006 for medium-sized companies. Regulation 6 defines which contracts are qualifying contracts. To be a qualifying contract, a relevant contract must not be for financial services, and must be governed by the law of a part of the United Kingdom other than by choice of the parties, or otherwise have a significant connection with the United Kingdom. A relevant contract is defined in section 3(2) of the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 – this is a contract for goods, services or intangible assets, made in connection with carrying on a business. Regulation 7 determines the reporting periods for which a qualifying company must publish information. Generally there are two reporting periods per financial year. Regulation 7 provides for one or three reporting periods in a financial year if a company shortens or extends its accounting reference period under section 392 of the Companies Act 2006, so that a financial year lasts for 9 months or less, or for more than 15 months. Failure to publish the information required, or publication of false or misleading information, is a criminal offence under regulations 8 and 9. Regulation 10 extends the time limit within which an offence under these Regulations can be prosecuted. Regulation 11 requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of these Regulations and publish a report within five years of the Regulations coming into force. Following the review it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether the Regulations should be allowed to expire as regulation 1(3) provides, be revoked early, or continue in force with or without amendment. A further instrument would be needed to continue the Regulations in force with or without amendments or to revoke them early. A full impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs to business and the voluntary sector is available from the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy at 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET and is published with an Explanatory Memorandum alongside the instrument on www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Late Payments and Long Payment Terms
Commons · 7 October 2024 · The Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Jonathan Reynolds)
Late payments and long payment terms continue to be a significant issue for small businesses and the self-employed across the UK. In 2022, small businesses were owed on average an estimated £22,000 in late payments from the businesses they supply. As well as the direct costs to businesses through lost and late revenue, there are also indirect costs, which include a reduction in productivity through lost time…
-
Draft Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2024
Commons · 15 January 2025 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Gareth Thomas)
I beg to move, That the Committee has considered the draft Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2024. It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms McVey. The regulations were laid in draft before the House on 7 October 2024. By way of introduction, let me explain that the regulations seek to amend the Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017…
-
Companies (Directors’ Report) (Payment Reporting) Regulations 2025
Lords · 15 October 2025 · Lord Leong (Lab)
My Lords, I am really conscious of what is happening in the Chamber, so I will try to be as comprehensive as possible and brief at the same time. I am really grateful to noble Lords across the Committee for their contribution. It is evident that we all agree that tackling late payments is crucial for driving the economy forward and I thank all those who have spoken in this debate. I will try and answer as many of…
-
Draft Companies (Directors' Report) (Payment Reporting) Regulations 2025
Commons · 21 October 2025 · Gareth Davies (Grantham and Bourne) (Con)
It is always a pleasure to see you in the Chair, Ms Vaz. I welcome the Minister to his place; it is a great appointment, and it is good to know that he comes to the position with a good deal of experience, which I know will be valuable to both officials and the House more broadly. I also welcome this opportunity, on behalf of His Majesty’s official Opposition, to address this issue. No matter where we represent,…
Other offences in the same instrument
- It is an offence for a person knowingly or recklessly— a to publish or cause to be published, for the…regulation 9(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regulations 2017 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2017