Amendment of the principal Order
article 6(b) of The North Korea (United Nations Sanctions) (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2017 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Objective fault
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
b after paragraph (2), insert—
3 Except under the authority of
a licence granted by the Secretary of State under this article,
a person (“P”) commits an offence if P provides insurance or reinsurance services to
a ship that P knows or has reasonable cause to suspect is owned, controlled or operated by North Korea.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Objective fault
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened and that it fell below the standard the provision sets. That is an objective test - what a reasonable person in the same position would have done, not what this defendant actually thought.
What a person personally believed or intended is not the question; the standard is what was reasonable.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: objective standard in the offence-creating words: reasonable cause to suspect.
What would breach article 6(b)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the North Korea (United Nations Sanctions) (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2017.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 13 December 2017
- In force from
- 10 January 2018
- Extent
- E+W+S+NI
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
Articles 3 to 8 of this Order amend the North Korea (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2009 (S.I. 2009/1749), as amended, giving effect to certain aspects of further United Nations sanctions imposed against North Korea by the United Nations Security Council in resolution 2375, adopted on 11th September 2017. Articles 8 and 10 also give effect to certain aspects of United Nations sanctions against North Korea by the United Nations Security Council in resolution 2371, adopted on 5th August 2017. This Order amends the offences related to carriage of goods to North Korea to broaden the goods to which the offences apply. They now include condensates and natural gas liquids, refined petroleum products, and crude oil, as defined in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, as amended. It also extends the offences related to carriage of goods from North Korea to include textiles, also as defined in Council Regulation 2017/1509, as amended. This Order creates an offence relating to the facilitation of or engagement in ship-to-ship transfers concerning North Korean ships and items being transported to or from North Korea. This Order also creates offences relating to access to UK ports by ships owned, operated, crewed or flagged by North Korea, or vessels which refuse inspection for carriage of goods prohibited under the North Korea (United Nations Sanctions) Order 2009 (S.I. 2009/1749).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Except under the authority of a licence granted by the Secretary of State under this article, a person (“P”)…article 6
- Except under the authority of a licence granted by the Secretary of State under this article, it is an…article 6(b)
- Leasing, chartering or provision of crew servicesarticle 6A(1)
- Leasing, chartering or provision of crew servicesarticle 6A(2)
- Registration of shipsarticle 6B
- Leasing, chartering or provision of crew services 6A 1 Except under the authority of a licence granted by…article 7
- Registration of ships 6B Except under the authority of a licence granted by the Secretary of State under…article 8
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The North Korea (United Nations Sanctions) (Amendment) (No. 3) Order 2017 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictionsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2017