Offences in respect of laws relating to mercury, enforcement notices and information
regulation 41(5) of The Control of Mercury (Enforcement) Regulations 2017
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
5 A person commits an offence if the person fails to produce
a document or record for an enforcing authority performing
a function pursuant to regulation 6.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to keep or produce records
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 41(5)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Keeping no record at all of something the instrument requires to be recorded under the Control of Mercury (Enforcement) Regulations 2017.
- Keeping records, but discarding them before the end of the retention period the instrument sets.
- Being unable to produce a record on request because it is held somewhere it cannot be got at in the time allowed.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 4 December 2017
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations supplement Regulation EU 2017/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council on mercury (“the Mercury Regulation”) by establishing offences, penalties and enforcement powers relating to that Regulation. These Regulations also implement Article 17 of the Mercury Regulation which requires the designation of authorities responsible for performing functions under that Regulation. Regulation 5 defines “enforcing authority” as— a for England and offshore installations in the English offshore area, the Environment Agency; b for Northern Ireland, the Department of Agriculture, Environment and Rural Affairs (“DAERA”); c for Scotland and offshore installations in the Scottish offshore area, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (“SEPA”); d for Wales, the Natural Resources Body for Wales (“NRW”). The definitions of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland include in each case an area of territorial sea adjacent to the United Kingdom (see regulation 3). Each area of territorial sea is defined by reference to co-ordinates set out in the Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/1711) (“the TSWR 2007”). The English offshore area and the Scottish offshore area are areas of sea which lie beyond the territorial sea adjacent to the United Kingdom (see Schedule 2). The co-ordinates of the Scottish border (which is used to differentiate the English offshore area and the Scottish offshore area) coincide with the relevant co-ordinates of the Scottish border within the meaning given by regulation 4A(2) of the TSWR 2007. Part 2 provides for civil enforcement by the Environment Agency and NRW who may— a give enforcement notices requiring a person to take action (including to stop doing any thing); b take action where an action in an enforcement notice has not been complied with; c give a penalty notice to a person requiring payment of a civil penalty not exceeding £200,000; d give a costs recovery notice requiring payment of costs relating to enforcement; e start proceedings in the County Court or High Court where other remedies would be ineffectual. A person may appeal to the First-tier Tribunal against an enforcement notice, civil penalty decision or a costs recovery notice (see regulations 8(8), 10(11), 13(11) and 15). Parts 3 and 4 respectively provide for enforcement by DAERA and SEPA who may— a give enforcement notices requiring a person to take action (including to stop doing any thing); b take action where an action in an enforcement notice has not been complied with; c give a costs recovery notice requiring payment of costs relating to enforcement. A person may appeal to the planning appeals commission in Northern Ireland against an enforcement notice or costs recovery notice given by DAERA. A person may appeal to the Scottish Ministers against an enforcement notice or costs recovery notice given by SEPA. Further provisions relating to appeals to the Scottish Ministers are set out in Schedule 3. Regulation 32 amends the Environmental Regulation (Enforcement Measures) (Scotland) Order 2015 (the “ERO 2015”) to add the offences in regulation 41 to the list of offences for which SEPA may take enforcement action under the ERO 2015. Regulation 33 confers power on customs officials to assist with enforcement by seizing and detaining material. Regulation 34 confers power on the enforcing authority and Welsh Ministers to share information obtained during the performance of certain functions related to the Mercury Regulation with other persons. Regulation 35 confers power on the enforcing authority to give information notices requiring a person to give information. Regulation 39 confers power on the Secretary of State to assist with enforcement in respect of offshore installations. Part 7 creates offences relating to the provisions of the Mercury Regulation which are listed in Schedule 1, enforcement notices, information notices and activities performed under the Regulations by customs officials and the Secretary of State. Part 8 contains amendments to other legislation. A full regulatory impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
How this became law
This instrument became law without a debate or a vote. Under the negative procedure it took effect unless a motion to stop it succeeded, and none was tabled.
Neither House could have amended it. A statutory instrument is put to each House as a whole thing, to be approved or not; the Houses can reject an instrument or record their regret, but they cannot change a word of it. That is the constitutional position for every offence on this site.
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Draft Reach Etc. (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 Draft Control of mercury (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 Draft Detergents (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020 Draft Waste and Environmental permitting Etc. (Legislative Functions and Amendment Etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020
Commons · 8 December 2020 · Rebecca Pow
It is a delight to see you in the Chair, Sir Charles, as we debate this bevy of statutory instruments. Of the four instruments before us, three are concerned with the regulation of chemicals and chemical products, and the fourth concerns the regulation of waste and environmental permitting. The common thread is that each one contains provisions necessary to implement the protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland. I…
-
Ozone-Depleting Substances and Fluorinated Greenhouse Gases (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020
Lords · 9 December 2020 · The Minister of State, Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park) (Con)
My Lords, there are three instruments in this group before the Committee today. Two are concerned with the regulation of chemicals and chemical products, and the third concerns the regulation of fluorinated gases and ozone-depleting substances. A common thread is that each one contains provisions necessary to implement the protocol on Ireland and Northern Ireland. We have worked with the devolved Administrations on…
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person commits an offence if the person fails to comply with a relevant provisionregulation 41(1)
- A person commits an offence if the person fails to comply with an enforcement noticeregulation 41(2)
- A person commits an offence if the person fails to comply with an information noticeregulation 41(3)
- A person commits an offence if the person gives an enforcing authority information which— a the person knows…regulation 41(4)
- A person commits an offence if the person intentionally obstructs a customs official performing a function…regulation 43(1)
- A person commits an offence if the person fails, without reasonable excuse, to give a customs official…regulation 43(2)
- A person commits an offence if the person gives a customs official performing a function under regulation…regulation 43(3)
- A person commits an offence if the person fails to produce a document or record for a customs official…regulation 43(4)
- A person commits an offence if the person intentionally obstructs an appointed person performing a function…regulation 44(1)
- A person commits an offence if the person fails, without reasonable excuse, to give an appointed person…regulation 44(2)
- A person commits an offence if the person gives an appointed person performing a function under regulation…regulation 44(3)
- A person commits an offence if the person fails to produce a document or record for an appointed person…regulation 44(4)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Control of Mercury (Enforcement) Regulations 2017 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2017