Enforcement of undertaking’s delivery obligations
regulation 17(8) of The Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Either way
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
8 If the undertaking fails to comply with
a notice served under paragraph (2) within
28 days after the service of such notice, an offence is committed by the undertaking and every person who is
a director of the undertaking.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- failing to comply with a notice or direction
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 17(8)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Being served with a notice under the Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014 and doing nothing by the date it specifies.
- Doing part of what the notice requires, where it required all of it.
- Disagreeing with the notice and ignoring it, rather than using whatever appeal the instrument provides.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Either way — magistrates’ court or Crown Court
- Maximum fine
- £5,000
- Standard scale
- Level 5
- Maximum prison (summary)
- 3 months
- Maximum prison (on indictment)
- 3 months
this is the level 5 value when the instrument came into force (2014-12-01); the standard scale is keyed to the date the offence was committed, and for conduct today the same words mean an unlimited fine.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Imposition of community and custodial sentences: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
When a community order or custody is justified at all, and the presumption against short custodial sentences.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 28 November 2014
- In force from
- 1 December 2014
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations come into force on 1st December 2014 and extend to the whole of the United Kingdom, reflecting the extent of the Companies Act 2006 (c.46) (“the Act”). These Regulations implement chapter 10 of Directive 2013/34/EU on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings. Chapter 10 requires certain undertakings active in the extractive or primary logging industries to make and publish reports on payments made to governments. Regulation 3 sets out the application of these Regulations. These Regulations will apply to all undertakings in relation to a financial year starting on or after 1st January 2015, apart from those undertakings which are subsidiaries of parent undertakings who are obliged to prepare consolidated groups accounts in member States other than the United Kingdom. These Regulations will apply in relation to financial years for these undertakings beginning on or after 1st January 2016. Regulation 4 contains the obligation on directors of undertakings which are both large or classified as public interest entities and active in the extractive or primary logging industries to produce a report on payments made to governments. Regulation 5 sets out the required content of the report. It allows undertakings to disclose payments at the entity level rather than a project level where payments are made in respect of obligations imposed at the entity level instead of at project level. For instance, if an undertaking has more than one project in a host country, and that country’s government levies corporate income taxes on the undertaking with respect to the undertaking’s income in the country as a whole, and not with respect to a particular project or operation within the country, the undertaking would be permitted to disclose the resulting income tax payment or payments without specifying a particular project associated with the payment. Regulations 6 and 7 contain exemptions from the requirement to prepare a report. These exemptions are for undertakings whose payments are included in a consolidated report of a parent undertaking in any member State. Regulation 8 requires directors of parent undertakings that have subsidiaries that are mining or quarrying undertakings or logging undertakings to prepare a consolidated report on payments made to governments if obliged to prepare consolidated group accounts under the Act. Regulation 9 sets out the required content of the consolidated report and regulation 10 contains exemptions from the obligation to prepare a consolidated report. Regulation 11 provides that payments made by a subsidiary undertaking may be excluded from a consolidated report in certain situations, provided that those subsidiary undertakings are also excluded on the same ground from the consolidated group accounts. Regulations 12 and 13 make provision for a further exemption for undertakings from the duty to prepare a report or consolidated report under these Regulations where an undertaking has already reported its payments made to governments under equivalent reporting requirements in a third-country. Regulation 14 obliges directors of undertakings who are required to prepare a report or consolidated report to deliver such reports to the registrar of companies within 11 months after the end of the financial year of the undertaking. Regulation 15 requires directors of undertakings that produce reports in accordance with equivalent reporting requirements to deliver the information contained in such reports to the registrar within 28 days of the report being made publicly available under the third-country reporting regime. It allows for the delivery of such information to be in a language other than English if accompanied by a certified translation. Reports delivered under regulations 14 or 15 must be delivered by electronic means. Regulation 16 makes it an offence to deliver to the registrar a false, misleading or deceptive document or statement under these Regulations. Regulations 17 and 18 create an enforcement regime to secure compliance with these Regulations. Regulation 19 gives the court the power to order the directors of an undertaking in default of an obligation to deliver a report under regulation 14 or information under regulation 15 to make good such default. Regulation 20 makes necessary consequential amendments to the Act and the Limited Liability Partnerships (Application of Companies Act 2006) Regulations 2009 (S.I. 2009/1804) to ensure that documents delivered to the registrar under these Regulations are subject to the Directive disclosure requirements. Regulation 21 requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of these Regulations and publish a report within three years after they come into force and within every five years after that. Following a review it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether these Regulations should remain as they are, or be revoked or be amended. A further instrument would be needed to revoke these Regulations or to amend them. A transposition note is available and is available on www.gov.uk/bis. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available from the Business Environment Directorate, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET or from www.gov.uk/bis and is annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum which is available alongside the instrument at www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
- Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014 Lords · 25 November 2014
-
Business without Debate
Commons · 26 November 2014
That the draft Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014, which were laid before this House on 23 October, be approved. —(Mel Stride.)
-
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill (Eleventh sitting)
Commons · 15 November 2022 · Kevin Hollinrake
Clause 94 amends the general false statement offence in section 1112 of the Companies Act 2006 to create two separate offences: a basic offence and an aggravated offence. The Bill also amends section 32 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 to make a mirror-image, two-tier approach. The existing false statement offence under the Companies Act requires a document or a false, misleading or…
-
Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Bill (Fourteenth sitting)
Commons · 17 November 2022 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (Kevin Hollinrake)
It is a pleasure to speak with you in the Chair, Sir Christopher. The clause amends section 15 of the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 to align it with amendments made to section 32 during the passage of that Act and with amendments introduced by this Bill. The clause substitutes section 15 and adds proposed new sections 15A and 15B. Proposed new section 15 restates and slightly amends the…
Other offences in the same instrument
- It is an offence for a person knowingly or recklessly— a to deliver or cause to be delivered to the…regulation 16(1)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.55.
- Basis
- c06_offence_committed
- Confidence
- 0.55 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Reports on Payments to Governments Regulations 2014 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2014