Compliance notices
regulation 5(1) of The Olive Oil (Marketing Standards) Regulations 2014
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted sales
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 An authorised officer who has reasonable grounds for believing that any person has not complied with, or is not likely to comply with, any provision in paragraph (2) may serve
a notice on that person (in these Regulations referred to as
a “compliance notice”) which states—
a the reason for the service of the notice and for the steps required to be taken;
b the steps which the person must take, being such steps as the authorised officer believes are necessary to ensure compliance with the provisions referred to in paragraph (2);
c the time by which each of the steps must be taken;
d that failure to comply with the notice is an offence; and
e the right of appeal against the notice and the period within which such an appeal may be brought.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- an authorised officer
- Conduct
- failing to comply with a notice or direction
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (believing that).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: believing that.
What would breach regulation 5(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Being served with a notice under the Olive Oil (Marketing Standards) Regulations 2014 and doing nothing by the date it specifies.
- Doing part of what the notice requires, where it required all of it.
- Disagreeing with the notice and ignoring it, rather than using whatever appeal the instrument provides.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 30 January 2014
- In force from
- Not determined
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations enforce in the United Kingdom Article 78(1)(g) and (2) of and Part VIII of Annex VII to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ No L 347, 20.12.2013, p671), Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 29/2012 on marketing standards for olive oil (OJ No L 12, 14.1.2012, p14) and Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2568/91 on the characteristics of olive oil and olive-residue oil and on the relevant methods of analysis (OJ No L 248, 5.9.1991, p1) (“the EU Regulations”). Part 2 sets out the powers of authorised officers. Regulation 4 provides for the appointment of authorised officers. Regulation 5 empowers an authorised officer to serve a compliance notice on any person who has not complied with or is not likely to comply with the EU Regulations. Regulation 6 confers powers of entry on authorised officers for the purposes of the execution and enforcement of these Regulations and the EU Regulations. Regulation 7 sets out the powers of authorised officers when they enter premises. Part 3 (regulations 8 to 10) sets out the procedures for appealing against a compliance notice. In relation to regulation 8, rule 22(1)(b) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009 (S.I. 2009/1976) sets out the time limit for the receipt of notice of appeal by the First-tier Tribunal (within 28 days of the date on which notice of the act or decision to which the proceedings relate was sent to the appellant). Part 4 sets out offences and penalties. Under regulation 11(2) a person guilty of an offence under these Regulations is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. Regulation 12 provides for a due diligence defence, regulation 13 for time limits for proceedings and regulations 14 and 15 for offences by, and proceedings against, businesses. Part 5 contains miscellaneous provisions. Regulation 16 provides for the payment of costs of counter-assessments. Regulation 17 sets out the enforcement authorities for the purposes of these Regulations. Regulation 19 (which applies in England only) requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of these Regulations and publish a report within 5 years of the date of their coming into force and within every five years after that. Following a review it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether the Regulations should, in relation to England, remain as they are or be revoked or amended. A further instrument would be needed to revoke or amend them. A full impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business and the voluntary sector is available at www.gov.uk or from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Nobel House, 17 Smith Square, London, SW1P 3JR. It is also annexed to the Explanatory Memorandum for these Regulations which is available alongside these Regulations on www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person is guilty of an offence if that person— a fails to comply with a compliance notice; b intentionally…regulation 11(1)
- Compliance noticesregulation 5(1)(d)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.88.
- Basis
- the provision says the conduct “is an offence”; the provision says an offence is committed “if” something happens
- Confidence
- 0.88 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Olive Oil (Marketing Standards) Regulations 2014 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Food, consumer protection, trading standards, product safety and age-restricted salesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2014