Contravention of The Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2014
the instrument as a whole of The Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2014
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Set by another provision
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheries
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
Contravening this instrument is an offence under section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The instrument itself contains no offence-creating words.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- Not determined
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
Classifier’s reasoning: contravention offences of this kind are strict as to the breach; the fault position is governed by the parent Act and was not read from it.
What would breach the instrument as a whole?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2014.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to section 33(1)(c) of the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974.
the penalty is in the parent Act, not in this instrument.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Environmental offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 July 2014
Covers unauthorised or harmful deposit, treatment or disposal of waste, illegal discharges to air, land and water, and the equivalent offences committed by organisations. It is the guideline that introduced turnover bands for corporate fines, so the size of the defendant company is a starting point rather than a mitigating detail.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 23 June 2014
- In force from
- 1 October 2014
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations consolidate, revoke and replace the Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2000 (S.I. 2000/2831) and its amending instruments (S.I. 2002/63, S.I. 2005/2466, S.I. 2010/2840). The Regulations implement Directive (EC) No 2009/41 (O.J. No L 125, 21.5.2009, p. 75) which lays down measures for the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms with a view to protecting human health and the environment. Section 2(2) of the European Communities Act 1972 is used to implement the aspects of the Directive which relate to protection of the environment. The Regulations also apply to the contained use of genetically modified organisms that are not micro-organisms, known as larger GMOs, but only in relation to risks to human health. Larger GMOs are not covered by the Directive. Contained use includes any activity or other action (for example storage) involving a genetically modified organism within a controlled environment where there are physical barriers and/or other controls in place to ensure that any genetically modified organism is not released into the environment. Certain techniques are or are not regarded as genetic modification and the Regulations do not apply to genetically modified organisms in a number of circumstances, for example, where there is a consent for use under other legislation. Some of the regulations are disapplied to genetically modified organisms when they are being transported (regulation 3 and Schedule 2). The Regulations extend to England, Scotland and Wales but not to Northern Ireland. The competent authority in relation to contained use in England and Wales is the Secretary of State and the Health and Safety Executive (“the Executive”) acting jointly. The competent authority in relation to contained use in Scotland is the Scottish Ministers and the Executive acting jointly. The joint competent authority is the two competent authorities acting jointly (regulation 2). The Regulations impose duties on people who are undertaking or proposing to undertake contained use (users) and persons responsible for contained use. These are people who either have the authority to determine whether contained use can take place, or people with control over the planning or conduct of the contained use. The meaning of some terms within the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 is modified so that the Regulations apply to educational institutions as if they were workplaces and students as if they were employees of the educational institution. They also apply to any person who is not an employee undertaking contained use (except a student) as if they were self-employed within the meaning of that Act (regulation 4). Before contained use involving micro-organisms can commence, a person responsible for the contained use must ensure that an assessment of the risks to human health and the environment has been carried out. The person carrying out the risk assessment must classify the contained use (from class 1 to class 4) depending on the seriousness of the risks posed, with 4 being the highest risk (regulation 5, Schedule 1 and Schedule 3). Contained use involving larger GMOs cannot commence until the person responsible has ensured that an assessment is carried out in relation to risks to human health (regulation 6 and Schedule 4) although there is no requirement to assign a class of use. There are specific requirements relating to the review, recording and keeping of risk assessments (regulation 7). A person responsible for contained use must obtain advice on the risk assessment either from an individual or a genetic modification safety committee with relevant expertise (regulation 8). Before premises are used for the first time, for contained use, a person responsible for the first contained use must notify the competent authority and provide information specified by regulation 9 and Schedule 5. One notification can include more than one premises. Where a notification contains premises situated in both Scotland and in England, or in both Scotland and in Wales the notification must be made to the joint competent authority. Before class 2 contained use can commence, a person responsible for the contained use must notify the competent authority of the contained use and provide information specified in Schedule 6 (regulation 10). A period of time must then elapse before contained use can begin. Class 3 or 4 contained use cannot commence unless the competent authority has given consent for the contained use. A person responsible must submit a notification for the contained use and provide the information specified in Schedule 6. Consent must be notified within a specified period that is dependent on whether the notifier already has consent for class 3 or class 4 contained use (regulation 11). Before contained use can commence involving a larger GMO (and the contained use will result in a more hazardous organism than its parent organism) a person responsible for that contained use must notify the competent authority of that contained use and provide the information specified in Schedule 6 (regulation 12). A notification for contained use where the premises notification had to be made to the joint competent authority must also be made to the joint competent authority. In certain circumstances the competent authority or joint competent authority may accept single notifications for a connected programme of work or contained use at more than one premises (regulation 13). There are various duties to notify the competent authority of changes of circumstances and changes that affect risks (regulations 14 and 15). If the competent authority asks for further information about a notification, the contained use must not commence or continue, except to store or destroy the genetically modified organisms, until the competent authority has agreed in writing that it may (regulation 16). A notifier may withdraw their application as long as the contained use has not commenced (regulation 17). Users are required to ensure that occupational and environmental safety principles are observed (Schedule 7) and that risks are kept to the lowest level reasonably practicable (regulation 18). A user carrying out contained use involving genetically modified micro-organisms is required to apply the containment measures which are appropriate to that contained use in accordance with the risk assessment. The containment measures are classified into different containment levels which largely correspond with the class assigned to the contained use, with level 4 being the highest level of containment. The measures are set out in Schedule 8 (regulation 19). A user carrying out contained use involving a larger GMO must apply the containment measures applicable in accordance with the risk assessment for that contained use (regulation 20). Where a risk assessment shows it is warranted, an emergency plan must be prepared before contained use can commence. In the case of genetically modified micro-organisms the plan must address risks to human health and the protection of the environment, in the case of larger GMOs the plan need only address human health, (regulation 21). If an accident occurs the person responsible for the contained use must notify the competent authority immediately and provide specified information (regulation 22). The competent authority is placed under a duty to examine a notification submitted to it under regulations 9(2), 10(2), 11(2) and 12(2) (regulation 23) and the Executive may ask the notifier for additional information on behalf of the competent authority (regulation 24). The competent authority has power to impose time limits or conditions on contained use, to suspend or terminate contained use or require that the contained use is not commenced. The competent authority may also vary or revoke any consent previously granted under regulation 11 (regulation 25). The competent authority may grant an exemption from the requirements of the Regulations but only if it is satisfied that the health and safety of persons and the environment are not prejudiced by the granting of an exemption (regulation 26). The competent authority is to maintain a register of all notifications and copies of the register are to be made available by the Executive for public inspection by appropriate means (regulation 28). Certain information may not be published if it would be contrary to the interests of national security (regulation 29). Provision is made for the enforcement of the Regulations under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (regulation 30). There is a right of appeal for any person who is aggrieved by certain decisions or actions of the competent authority or the Executive (regulation 31). Anything that must be submitted to the competent authority under the regulations must be submitted to the Executive at the address it publishes on its website for the purpose (regulation 32). There are various transitional, saving and consequential provisions and a number of instruments are revoked (see paragraph 1 above) (regulations 33 to 35). A Transposition Note has been produced and is published on the website of the Health and Safety Executive www.hse.gov.uk. A copy of the impact assessment prepared in respect of these Regulations can be obtained from www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Draft Chemicals (Health and Safety) and Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) (Amendment Etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Commons · 13 March 2019 · Sarah Newton
I would be delighted to. As I will go on to explain, the regimes will be administered by the Health and Safety Executive, so the draft instrument will protect workers’ rights by ensuring that we continue to have some of the safest workplaces in the world—we have a proud tradition of that. I am delighted that the team from the HSE that worked so hard on the draft regulations, and the lawyers that helped us to…
-
Chemicals (Health and Safety) and Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Lords · 21 March 2019 · The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Baroness Buscombe) (Con)
My Lords, this draft statutory instrument was laid before Parliament on 18 February and was approved in another place on 13 March 2019. The Government’s priority is to reach a negotiated settlement with the EU. However, it is our duty as a responsible Government to prepare for all eventualities, including leaving with no deal. This statutory instrument is one such contingency measure to ensure that regulations…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.70.
- Basis
- the penalty comes from the enabling Act rather than from this instrument
- Confidence
- 0.70 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Genetically Modified Organisms (Contained Use) Regulations 2014 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Health and safety, environment, waste and fisheriesOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2014