5 A carrier, tour operator or travel agent who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 7 or 8(2), (3),…
regulation 3(5) of The Merchant Shipping (Passengers’ Rights) Regulations 2013
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harbours
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
5 A carrier, tour operator or travel agent who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article
7 or 8(2), (3), (4) or (5) is guilty of an offence.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a carrier
- Conduct
- contravening a requirement of the instrument
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a carrier meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 3(5)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words an offence is committed where a carrier contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 7 or 8(2), (3), (4) or (5).
- Doing the thing the provision prohibits under the Merchant Shipping (Passengers’ Rights) Regulations 2013, whatever the reason for doing it.
- Where the requirement is a positive duty, letting the time for performing it pass without performing it.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Health and safety offences, corporate manslaughter and food safety and hygiene offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 February 2016
Covers breaches of duty under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 and the regulations made under it, and food safety and food hygiene offences. Sentencing turns on culpability and on the seriousness and likelihood of harm risked, not only on the harm that happened.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 26 February 2013
- In force from
- 27 March 2013
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations ) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations provide for the enforcement of the rights and entitlements set out in Regulation (EU) No 1177/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L. 334, 17.12.2010, p1) (“the EU Regulation”) which concerns the rights of passengers, particularly those with a disability or reduced mobility, when travelling by sea and inland waterway. Regulation 3 provides offences for failure to comply with various obligations set out in the EU Regulation. These obligations fall, respectively, on sea and inland waterway carriers, ticket vendors, port authorities, terminal operators, tour operators, and travel agents, and the penalties provided by regulation 4 vary from fines not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale on summary conviction to an unlimited fine on conviction on indictment. Regulation 5 provides that, where a person on whom an obligation is imposed, arranges for another person to carry out that obligation on their behalf, both parties commit an offence if it is contravened. Regulation 6 provides that it will be a defence for a person to demonstrate that all reasonable steps were taken to ensure compliance with the EU Regulation. Regulation 7 provides that members and officers of corporate bodies, partnerships and unincorporated associations who have contributed to a failure to comply with the EU Regulation are also be liable to prosecution. Regulation 8 designates the Maritime and Coastguard Agency as the body responsible for the enforcement of the EU Regulation, and gives it the right to ask for information to assist it in carrying out its functions: it is an offence punishable with a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale on summary conviction, or an unlimited fine on conviction on indictment, to fail to provide it with such information without reasonable excuse. Regulation 9 enables persons who have suffered an infringement of their rights under the EU Regulation to seek compensation separately from any penal sanction that may be imposed. A claim for compensation must be brought within six months of the infringement complained of unless the court considers it is just and equitable to consider a claim that is out of time. Regulation 10 provides that certain transitory provisions relating to the commencement of the Equality Act 2010 do not apply to the extent that the EU Regulation governs a particular case. Regulation 11 requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of these Regulations and publish a report within five years after they come into force and within every five years after that. Following a review it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether the Regulations should remain as they are, or be revoked or be amended. A further instrument would be needed to revoke the Regulations or to amend them. A full regulatory impact assessment of the effect that this instrument will have on the costs of business has been produced and a copy placed in the library of both Houses of Parliament. Copies may be obtained from the Department for Transport, Great Minster House, 33 Horseferry Road, London, SW1P 4DR. Alternatively, copies can be obtained from the Department for Transport’s website, which is at www.gov.uk. It is also published with the Explanatory Memorandum alongside the instrument on www.legislation.gov.uk.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Merchant Shipping (Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019
Lords · 18 March 2019 · Baroness Sugg
I thank noble Lords for their consideration of these draft regulations. The noble Baroness, Lady Randerson, pointed out the high quality of the seafarer qualifications, and we will continue to recognise them in accordance with the international STCW convention, so standards will not slip and will not be affected by our departure from the EU. To work on a UK-registered vessel, EU seafarers will still need to obtain…
Other offences in the same instrument
- A carrier who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 4(1), 17, 18 or 19(5) is guilty of an offenceregulation 3(1)
- A carrier or a ticket vendor who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 4(2) is guilty of an offenceregulation 3(2)
- A carrier or a terminal operator who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 10, 11(3), (4) or (5),…regulation 3(3)
- A carrier, port authority or terminal operator who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 23 is guilty…regulation 3(4)
- A carrier, terminal operator, tour operator or travel agent who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article…regulation 3(6)
- A carrier, terminal operator, ticket vendor, tour operator or travel agent who contravenes an obligation…regulation 3(7)
- A tour operator or travel agent who contravenes an obligation imposed by Article 11(3) or 12(2) is guilty of…regulation 3(8)
- Where— a an offence is committed by a body corporate or a partnership (including a limited liability…regulation 7(1)
- a an offence is committed by a body corporate or a partnership (including a limited liability partnership…regulation 7(1)(a)
- Enforcementregulation 8(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Merchant Shipping (Passengers’ Rights) Regulations 2013 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Transport: maritime, aviation, rail and harboursOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2013