Amendment to the Export Control (Syria Sanctions) Order 2013
article 15 of The Export Control (North Korea and Ivory Coast Sanctions and Syria Amendment) Order 2013 (revoked)
- Status not determined
- Mixed — some elements strict, some not
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictions
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
15 The Export Control (Syria Sanctions ) Order 2013 is amended as follows—
a in article 4, for “a person shall not (directly or indirectly) export, supply or transfer” substitute “a person commits an offence and may be arrested if that person (directly or indirectly) exports, supplies or transfers”;
b in article 5(1) for “a person shall not (directly or indirectly) provide” substitute “a person commits an offence and may be arrested if that person (directly or indirectly) provides”.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- selling or supplying something the instrument restricts
- Fault element
- Mixed — some elements strict, some not
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove the conduct, and - for those elements the provision qualifies (knowingly, with intent to) - the state of mind it names. The remaining elements carry no fault requirement, so they are strict.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: the offence itself carries no fault word, but a duty it criminalises by cross-reference uses knowingly, with intent to; which element that governs was not determined.
What would breach article 15?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- On these words it is an offence to (directly or indirectly) export, supply or transfer” substitute “a person commits an offence and may be arrested if that person (directly or indirectly) exports, supplies or transfers”.
- Selling the goods under the Export Control (North Korea and Ivory Coast Sanctions and Syria Amendment) Order 2013 where the instrument prohibits the sale outright.
- Supplying without carrying out a check the instrument requires first, even where the sale would otherwise be lawful.
- Offering for sale counts as well as selling: displaying stock is enough where the provision reaches an offer.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated here: this instrument amends another one, and the penalty for the offence is in the instrument being amended.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 12 December 2013
- In force from
- 7 January 2014
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Order) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
This Order makes provision for the enforcement of certain trade restrictions against North Korea specified in Council Regulation (EC) No 329/2007 (OJ L 88, 29.3.2007, p1) as last amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 696/2013 (OJ L 198, 23.7.2013, p22) (the “North Korea Regulation”). It also provides for the enforcement of trade restrictions against the Ivory Coast specified in Council Regulation (EC) No 174/2005 (OJ No L 29, 2.2.2005, p5) as last amended by Council Regulation (EU) No 617/2012 (OJ L 179, 11.7.2012, p1) (the “Ivory Coast Regulation”). The Order sets out offences in relation to these prohibitions and those offences can be committed by any person in the United Kingdom and, around the world, by any United Kingdom person, as defined in section 11 of the Export Control Act 2002(c. 28). The Order consolidates in one single instrument the enforcement of the trade restrictions against North Korea and the Ivory Coast formerly covered by the Export Control (North Korea) Order 2007 (S.I. 2007/1334) and its subsequent amendments (S.I. 2010/132 and article 7 of S.I. 2011/1296) and the Export Control (Iraq and Ivory Coast) Order 2005 (S.I. 2005/232), which are revoked and replaced by this Order. The measures against North Korea include prohibitions on the sale, supply, export or transfer of goods and technology listed in Annexes I, Ia and Ib of the North Korea Regulation and prohibitions in relation to providing or obtaining technical training, technical assistance, financing or financial assistance in relation to those items. There are also restrictions on the trade of gold or precious metals and diamonds to and from North Korea and restrictions on the trade of luxury goods and newly printed or unissued North Korean denominated banknotes and minted coinage. The trade sanctions against the Ivory Coast have been significantly reduced following the adoption of Council Decision 2012/371/CFSP (OJ L 179, 11.7.2012, p21) and its implementing Regulation (EU) No 617/2012 (OJ L 179, 11.7.2012, p1) both of 10 July 2012. The measures include prohibitions on the supply, transfer or export of equipment which might be used for internal repression as listed in Annex I to the Ivory Coast Regulation. Articles 4 to 7 create offences for contravention of the trade restrictions of the North Korea Regulation referred to there. Article 8 creates offences for contravention of the restrictions in Article 3(a) of the Ivory Coast Regulation. There are already offences relating to prohibited importation and exportation of goods in sections 50, 68 and 170 of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 (1979 c.2) (“the 1979 Act”). Article 12 sets out the penalties relating to the offences in the Order and makes some consequential modifications to the 1979 Act to ensure that the offences covered by that Act are subject to the same penalties as those in the Order. Article 13 provides for the ancillary provisions which apply to the enforcement of customs and excise legislation to also apply to the enforcement of this Order. Article 14 amends the Export Control Order 2008 (S.I. 2008/3231) to include Syria in the list of countries in Part 4 of Schedule 4, so that the exemption for transit controls in article 17 of that Order does not apply when the goods in transit are those listed in Part 2 of Schedule 1 to the Order and they are being exported to Syria. Article 15 amends the Export Control (Syria Sanctions) Order 2013 (S.I. 2013/2012) to expressly provide that a person carrying out any of the activities described in articles 4 and 5 without the authority of a UK licence commits an offence and may be arrested. Article 16 requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of the Order and publish a report within five years after the Order comes into force and within every five years after that. Following a review it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether the Order should remain as it is, or be revoked or amended. A further instrument would be needed to revoke the Order or to amend it. A regulatory impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as it has no or minimal impact on business, charities or voluntary bodies. A copy of the Explanatory Memorandum is published alongside the Order on www.legislation.gov.uk. Further information is available from the Export Control Organisation, BIS, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET and on the gov.uk website (www.gov.uk).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Circumvention of prohibitions in the Ivory Coast Regulationarticle 10
- A person commits an offence (and may be arrested) who, for the purpose of obtaining an EU authorisation— a…article 11(1)
- A person who, having acted under the authority of an EU authorisation, fails to comply with a requirement or…article 11(3)
- a in article 4, for “a person shall not (directly or indirectly) export, supply or transfer” substitute “a…article 15(a)
- b in article 5(1) for “a person shall not (directly or indirectly) provide” substitute “a person commits an…article 15(b)
- Unless authorised by an EU authorisation, a person who is knowingly concerned in an activity, other than the…article 4
- Unless authorised by an EU authorisation, a person who is knowingly concerned in an activity, other than the…article 5
- A person who is knowingly concerned in an activity, other than the export or the import of goods, prohibited…article 6
- A person who is knowingly concerned in an activity, other than the export of goods, prohibited by Article 4b…article 7
- Unless authorised by an EU authorisation, a person who is knowingly concerned in an activity, other than the…article 8
- Circumvention of prohibitions in the North Korea Regulationarticle 9(1)
- Circumvention of prohibitions in the North Korea Regulationarticle 9(2)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.96.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.96 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Export Control (North Korea and Ivory Coast Sanctions and Syria Amendment) Order 2013 (revoked) Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- International sanctions, export control and trade restrictionsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2013