Offences related to EU authorisations
regulation 5(1) of The Export Control (Sudan and South Sudan Sanctions) and (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011
- Revoked
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and tax
The provision has been revoked and no saving provision preserving liability for earlier conduct was found.
What the provision says
1 A person commits an offence and may be arrested who, for the purpose of obtaining an EU authorisation—
a makes any statement or furnishes any document or information which to that person’s knowledge is false in
a material particular; or
b recklessly makes any statement or furnishes any document or information which is false in
a material particular.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (for the purpose of obtaining, recklessly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: recklessly, for the purpose of obtaining.
What would breach regulation 5(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Export Control (Sudan and South Sudan Sanctions) and (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Sentencing organisations: fines and the means of a corporate defendant
All courts in England and Wales
How a fine on a company is arrived at from its turnover. Relevant far beyond the guidelines that state it, because a very large share of the offences in this corpus can only be committed by an organisation.
-
Fraud, bribery and money laundering offences: definitive guideline
Magistrates' courts and the Crown Court in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2014
Covers fraud, false accounting, bribery and money laundering, including offences committed by organisations.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Revoked
- Revoked by
- The Export Control (Sudan, South Sudan and Central African Republic Sanctions) Regulations 2014 (revoked)
- Revoked on
- 31 December 2014
- Made
- 6 December 2011
- In force from
- 30 December 2011
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: the instrument was revoked by a later instrument found in this corpus.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make provision for penalties and enforcement of certain restrictive measures in Council Regulation (EC) No 131/2004 imposing certain restrictive measures in respect of Sudan and South Sudan (“the Sudan and South Sudan Regulation”). The measures include prohibitions on the provision of technical assistance, financing or financial assistance related to military activities to any person, entity or body in, or for use in Sudan or South Sudan. Regulation 2(1) revokes the Sudan (Technical Assistance and Financing and Financial Assistance)(Penalties and Licenses) Regulations 2004 (S.I. 2004/373), which are replaced by these Regulations. Regulation 4 makes it an offence to contravene provisions in Articles 2 and 3 of the Sudan and South Sudan Regulation. Regulation 5 supplements the provisions of the Sudan and South Sudan Regulation that allow a competent authority to authorise activities that are otherwise prohibited. Regulation 5(1) makes it an offence knowingly and recklessly to provide false information for the purpose of obtaining an authorisation. Authorisations may be subject to requirements or conditions which continue even after the activity authorised has been carried out. Regulation 5(3) makes it an offence to fail to comply with such continuing requirements or conditions unless they were imposed after the activity was carried out or amended after that time in such a way as to give rise to non-compliance. Regulation 6 sets out the penalties relating to the offences in regulations 4 and 5. Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs will enforce the provisions of the Regulations. Regulation 7 provides that the ancillary provisions which apply to their enforcement of customs and excise legislation apply to the enforcement of these Regulations. Regulation 8 amends Part 2 of Schedule 4 to the Export Control Order 2008 (S.I.2008/3231) to make South Sudan an ‘embargoed destination’ for the purposes of the application of trade controls under that Order. Regulation 9 requires the Secretary of State to review the operation and effect of these Regulations and publish a report within five years after they come into force and within every five years after that. Following a review it will fall to the Secretary of State to consider whether the Regulations should remain as they are, or be revoked or be amended. A further instrument would be needed to revoke the Regulations or to amend them. Regulation 10 amends the instruments listed in that regulation so as to revoke the provisions which deal with the limited overlap between the Export Control Order 2008 and those instruments. A regulatory impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as it has no or minimal impact on business, charities or voluntary bodies. A copy of the Explanatory Memorandum is published alongside this instrument on www.legislation.gov.uk. Further information is available from the Export Control Organisation, BIS, 1 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0ET and on BIS website (www.bis.gov.uk).
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- A person who contravenes any of the following provisions of the Sudan and South Sudan Regulation commits an…regulation 4(1)
- A person commits an offence and may be arrested who participates, knowingly and intentionally, in activities…regulation 4(2)
- A person who, having acted under the authority of an EU authorisation, fails to comply with a requirement or…regulation 5(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Export Control (Sudan and South Sudan Sanctions) and (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2011 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Corporate, financial services, company law, employment, charity, electoral and taxOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2011