Grant of approval conditions
regulation 7(3)(e) of The Identity Cards Act 2006 (Provision of Information with Consent) Regulations 2009
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Immigration and identity documents
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
e informing the Secretary of State if that person, or anyone acting on that person’s behalf, has reasonable grounds for suspecting that an individual has committed or is attempting to commit an offence relating to the Register or an identity document;
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 7(3)(e)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Identity Cards Act 2006 (Provision of Information with Consent) Regulations 2009.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
no penalty is stated in this instrument; it may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 23 September 2009
- In force from
- 20 October 2009
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
The Secretary of State may under section 12(1) of the Identity Cards Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”) provide a person with information recorded in an individual’s entry in the Register if— c an application for the provision of the information to that person is made by or with the authority of that individual; or d that individual otherwise consents to the provision of that information to that person. Regulation 2 provides that an individual may give consent to the provision of information from that individual’s entry in the Register under that section 12(1) of the 2006 Act on a particular occasion by signing a document which explains the effect of doing so. Regulation 3 makes provision about who can make an application for the provision of information under section 12 of the 2006 Act. Regulation 4 provides that an accredited person may make an application for information from passport records under the Passport Validation Service with the consent of an individual. Regulation 5 imposes conditions which must be satisfied in order that the Secretary of State can provide information about an individual to another person under section 12 of the 2006 Act. These are that (a) the person to whom the information is to be provided has registered the particulars prescribed in regulation 5 and (ii) that that person and the applicant (where different) are for the time being approved by the Secretary of State in writing. Regulation 6 prescribes the particulars that must be registered before information can be provided to another person under regulation 5. Regulation 7(1) provides that a grant of approval in respect of a person to whom information is to be provided is subject to that person complying with the conditions set out in paragraph (2). Regulation 8 makes provision about the suspension or withdrawal of a grant of approval.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
Other offences in the same instrument
- Grant of approval conditionsregulation 7(3)
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Identity Cards Act 2006 (Provision of Information with Consent) Regulations 2009 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Immigration and identity documentsOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2009