False answers on enlistment
regulation 12(1) of The Armed Forces (Enlistment) Regulations 2009
- Status not determined
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Miscellaneous
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
1 A person commits an offence if, on appearing before
a recruiting officer and offering to enlist in the regular forces, he knowingly gives
a false answer to any question approved by or on behalf of the Defence Council for inclusion in an enlistment paper and put to him by or on the direction of the recruiting officer.
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- making a false or misleading statement
- Fault element
- Requires proof of a state of mind
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove both that the conduct happened and that it was done with the state of mind the provision names (knowingly).
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: mens rea word in the offence-creating words: knowingly.
What would breach regulation 12(1)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Entering a figure on a form or return that is known to be wrong under the Armed Forces (Enlistment) Regulations 2009.
- Leaving out something the form asks for, where the omission is what makes the answer misleading.
- Producing a document to an official that has been altered since it was issued.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Not determined
- Maximum fine
- £200
- Standard scale
- Level 1
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 20 July 2009
- In force from
- 31 October 2009
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations make provision with respect to the enlistment of persons in the regular forces. Regulation 3 requires enlistment to be undertaken by recruiting officers, and provides for the appointment of such officers. Regulation 4 prohibits the enlistment of persons under the age of 16, and makes the purported enlistment of such a person void unless the recruiting officer is satisfied that the person is at least 16; but the recruiting officer’s signature on the enlistment paper is sufficient evidence that he was so satisfied unless the contrary is proved. Regulation 5 requires the written consent of a parent or other appropriate person (if such a person can be identified), or in some cases more than one such person, before a person under the age of 18 may be enlisted. Regulation 6 enables a person enlisted into the regular army to be enlisted for service in a corps or for general service. Regulation 7 sets out the procedure for enlistment, including the attestation of the enlistment by the recruiting officer and delivery of the completed enlistment paper to an approving officer. Regulations 8 to 11 make provision as to the validity of an enlistment. Regulations 8 and 9 allow the enlistment to be declared invalid by the approving officer or, on application, the Defence Council. The recruit may make an application to the Defence Council within three months of the enlistment (or before his 16th birthday, if later). If he was aged under 18 at the time of the enlistment, his parent or other appropriate person may also apply. Where his enlistment is declared invalid, regulation 10 requires him to be discharged, but he is deemed to be a member of the regular forces until discharged. Regulation 11 deems an enlistment to be valid unless it has been declared invalid under regulation 8 or 9 or is void under regulation 4 or any other enactment. Regulation 12 creates an offence of knowingly giving a false answer to any question in the enlistment paper put to the recruit by the recruiting officer. The offence may be tried by a civilian court, but is also a service offence if the recruit is enlisted and thus becomes subject to service law. The Schedule contains transitional provisions.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Armed Forces, Army, Air Force and Naval Discipline Acts (Continuation) Order 2009
Lords · 18 June 2009 · Lord Lee of Trafford
My Lords, from the Liberal Democrat Benches, I support these eight orders. They represent a thorough updating of Armed Forces law, particularly in relation to enlistment, court-martial and other disciplinary and prosecution matters. The Armed Forces (Enlistment) Regulations 2009 will have a somewhat historic impact on the Royal Navy, in that it will mean recruits will no longer enter service but will be enlisted…
-
Business without Debate
Commons · 24 June 2009 · Mr. Speaker
With the leave of the House, we shall take motions 4 to 11 together. Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 118(6)), Tribunals and Inquiries That the draft Transfer of Functions of the Consumer Credit Appeals Tribunal Order 2009, which was laid before this House on 1 June, be approved. That the draft Transfer of Functions (Transport Tribunal and Appeal Panel) Order 2009, which was laid before…
-
Armed Forces Bill
Lords · 27 April 2016 · Earl Howe
My Lords, I welcome the continued interest of the noble Lord, Lord Judd, in the recruitment of under-18s into the Armed Forces and I hope that I can now provide a considerable measure of reassurance to him and other noble Lords who have spoken. Let me start by addressing Amendment 7. As I said in Grand Committee, we are very clear in our belief that junior entry offers a range of benefits not only to the Armed…
-
Armed Forces Recruitment: Under-18s
Commons · 7 February 2017 · Steven Paterson (Stirling) (SNP)
I am grateful for the chance to speak and to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Pritchard. The SNP’s position is that we recognise persons who have reached the age of 16 as old enough to leave school, marry, work and pay tax, and, despite scepticism from the other parties in Scotland before the independence referendum, we believe and have long believed that they have the right to vote as well. I am glad to say that…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.
- Basis
- the provision says a person “commits an offence”
- Confidence
- 0.92 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Armed Forces (Enlistment) Regulations 2009 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- MiscellaneousOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2009