Transitional
regulation 17(3) of The Armed Forces (Part 5 of the Armed Forces Act 2006) Regulations 2009
- Status not determined
- Strict liability
- Set by another provision
- Courts, police, prisons and the administration of justice
This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.
What the provision says
“the corresponding civil offence”, in relation to an offence under section
70 of AA 1955 or AFA 1955 or section
42 of NDA 1957, means— the act or omission constituting that offence; or if that act or omission is not punishable by the law of England and Wales, the equivalent act done or omission made in England or Wales;
Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.
Who it binds, and what has to be proved
- Binds
- a person
- Conduct
- breaching the provision
- Fault element
- Strict liability
- Burden of proof
- No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything
The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.
Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.
The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.
Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.
What would breach regulation 17(3)?
These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.
- Doing what the provision prohibits, or failing to do what it requires under the Armed Forces (Part 5 of the Armed Forces Act 2006) Regulations 2009.
Penalty
- Mode of trial
- Set by another provision — the instrument states the penalty by reference to an Act or to another regulation
- Maximum fine
- Not determined
- Maximum prison (summary)
- Not determined
The instrument does not state a penalty itself. It sets one by reference to section 47K of that Act.
penalty is that of the referenced enactment; not stated in this instrument.
No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.
Sentencing
Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.
-
Reduction in sentence for a guilty plea: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 June 2017
The sliding scale of credit for pleading guilty, from one third at the first stage of proceedings downwards.
-
General guideline: overarching principles
All courts in England and Wales · in force from 1 October 2019
The guideline a court uses when there is no offence-specific guideline, which is the position for the overwhelming majority of offences created by statutory instrument. It sets out how culpability and harm are assessed from first principles.
-
Totality: definitive guideline
All courts in England and Wales
How to sentence more than one offence at once so that the total is just and proportionate - frequently in point here, because regulatory prosecutions commonly charge several breaches of the same instrument.
Prosecution figures
No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.
Status and lifecycle
- Current status
- Status not determined
- Made
- 20 July 2009
- In force from
- 21 July 2009
- Extent
- Not stated
How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.
What the instrument is for
(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.
These Regulations relate to the provisions of Part 5 of the Armed Forces Act 2006 (“the Act”), and in particular to the investigation of suspected service offences, to the referral of cases and charges to the Director of Service Prosecutions (“DSP”) and commanding officers, to the procedure for bringing charges and to related powers to amend, substitute or add charges. Regulation 3 prescribes circumstances, additional to those specified in the Act, which a commanding officer must ensure that a service police force is aware of. Regulation 5 prescribes circumstances, additional to those specified in the Act, in which cases must be referred by the service police to the DSP instead of to the commanding officer of the person who is suspected of having committed a service offence. Regulation 1 brings the Regulations into force immediately primarily for the purpose of enabling a service policeman to report to a commanding officer, before 31st October 2009, that he is not aware, of any circumstances of a description prescribed by regulation 5. Where such a report has been made and certain other conditions are satisfied, the service policeman will be deemed under an order made under section 380 of the Act to have referred the case to the commanding officer under section 116(3) of the Act. Regulations 7, 8, 9 and 10 impose requirements for the provision of documents in connection with the referral of cases. Regulation 8 also deals with the provision by a commanding officer to the DSP of information about a case which has been referred to the DSP. Regulation 11 provides for the process of bringing a charge and, by reference to the Schedule, provides for the proper preparation of the charge sheet. Regulation 12 provides for who must be given the charge sheet where a commanding officer brings a charge in accordance with a direction under section 121(2) of the Act from the DSP. Regulation 13 provides for the application of regulation 11, and accordingly of the provisions of the Schedule, to the amending, substituting or adding of charges by a commanding officer. Regulation 14 provides in relation to the amendment, substitution or adding of charges by the DSP before the accused is arraigned. Regulation 15 provides for written notification to be given of the discontinuation of proceedings, the reference of a charge by the DSP to a commanding officer, the allocation or re-allocation of a charge to a service court and directions by the DSP barring proceedings. Regulation 16 provides for the delegation by commanding officers to subordinate commanders of their functions under Part 5 of the Act and under these Regulations. Regulation 1 brings the Regulations into force immediately for the purpose of enabling commanding officers to make such delegations before 31st October 2009. Regulation 17 makes transitional provision.
Read the full note and every offence in this instrument
What Parliament said
Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.
-
Armed Forces, Army, Air Force and Naval Discipline Acts (Continuation) Order 2009
Lords · 18 June 2009 · The Minister for International Defence and Security (Baroness Taylor of Bolton)
My Lords, as the House will know, the statutory instruments are all affirmative and follow the Armed Forces Act 2006. The current service discipline Acts date back to the 1950s, and over the years they have been renewed and amended at regular intervals. Work to consider a possible single system of service law began in 2001 and culminated in the Bill that was introduced at the end of 2005. This was the largest and…
-
Armed Forces, Army, Air Force and Naval Discipline Acts (Continuation) Order 2009
Lords · 18 June 2009 · Lord Lee of Trafford
My Lords, from the Liberal Democrat Benches, I support these eight orders. They represent a thorough updating of Armed Forces law, particularly in relation to enlistment, court-martial and other disciplinary and prosecution matters. The Armed Forces (Enlistment) Regulations 2009 will have a somewhat historic impact on the Royal Navy, in that it will mean recruits will no longer enter service but will be enlisted…
-
Business without Debate
Commons · 24 June 2009 · Mr. Speaker
With the leave of the House, we shall take motions 4 to 11 together. Motion made, and Question put forthwith (Standing Order No. 118(6)), Tribunals and Inquiries That the draft Transfer of Functions of the Consumer Credit Appeals Tribunal Order 2009, which was laid before this House on 1 June, be approved. That the draft Transfer of Functions (Transport Tribunal and Appeal Panel) Order 2009, which was laid before…
-
Armed Forces (Tri-Service Serious Crime Unit) (Consequential Amendments) (No. 2) Regulations 2022
Lords · 8 November 2022 · The Minister of State, Ministry of Defence (Baroness Goldie) (Con)
My Lords, this statutory instrument makes a minor consequential amendment to Regulation 8(1) of the Armed Forces (Part 5 of the Armed Forces Act 2006) Regulations 2009. This change is required to support the establishment of the Defence Serious Crime Unit, or DSCU for short. It does this by ensuring that the new provost marshal and service police personnel of this tri-service unit are governed by the same…
How this was identified as an offence
Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.60.
- Basis
- the provision says the conduct is “punishable”
- Confidence
- 0.60 of 1.00
A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.
Check the source
- This provision on legislation.gov.uk The authoritative text. Check it before relying on anything here.
- The Armed Forces (Part 5 of the Armed Forces Act 2006) Regulations 2009 Every offence this instrument creates, and its explanatory note
- Courts, police, prisons and the administration of justiceOther offences on the same subject
- Offences created in 2009