UK Offence Report

Access to marked registers and other election documents: contravention of conditions

paragraph 72(1) of SCHEDULE 2 of The European Parliamentary Elections (Amendment) Regulations 2009

This offence was read from the text as made, and no revised version was available, so a later revocation could not be ruled out. Check the current text at legislation.gov.uk.

What the provision says

1 A person is guilty of an offence—

a if he fails to comply with any of the conditions imposed under rule 70; or

b he is an appropriate supervisor of

a person (P) who fails to comply with any such condition and he failed to take appropriate steps.

Text as made, from legislation.gov.uk. © Crown copyright, reused under the Open Government Licence v3.0. This is the text as originally made; later amendments are not shown here.

Who it binds, and what has to be proved

Binds
a person
Conduct
breaching a condition of a licence, permit or consent
Fault element
Strict liability
Burden of proof
No statutory defence — prosecution proves everything

The prosecution must prove that the conduct happened. This is a strict liability offence as drafted: the provision uses no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence, so there is no need to show that a person meant to do it, knew about it, or was careless.

Intention, knowledge and carelessness are irrelevant to guilt. They may still matter a great deal to sentence.

The provision states no defence, so the prosecution bears the burden on every element of the offence.

Classifier’s reasoning: no word of intention, knowledge, recklessness or negligence in the offence or its provision.

What would breach paragraph 72(1) of SCHEDULE 2?

These are illustrations, not law. They are generated from the provision’s own words to show the shape of the offence. Whether any particular conduct is caught depends on the full text, on any amendment since, and on the facts.

  1. Holding a valid licence but doing the thing it allows outside the hours, place or limits its conditions set under the European Parliamentary Elections (Amendment) Regulations 2009.
  2. Failing to do something a condition positively requires - a record, a notification, a monitoring step - even though the licensed activity itself is carried on properly.

Penalty

Mode of trial
Summary only — tried in a magistrates’ court
Maximum fine
Not determined
Standard scale
Level 5
Maximum prison (summary)
Not determined

the level is stated but no money value is given: this instrument extends outside the United Kingdom, where the standard scale set by s.122(1) of the Sentencing Act 2020 does not run.

No penalty was determined from this instrument. It may be in the enabling Act, or in a general penalties provision this pass did not connect to the offence. Absence of a figure here is not evidence that the offence carries no penalty.

Sentencing

Offences of this kind are usually sentenced under the guidelines below. This is a mapping by subject, not a finding about this provision, and the links go to a search of the Sentencing Council’s own site.

Prosecution figures

No published per-offence figure was found for this provision, and it could not be matched to a Ministry of Justice offence code. Offences created by statutory instrument very largely do not have one. Absence of a figure is not evidence that the offence is unused.

Status and lifecycle

Current status
Status not determined
Made
29 January 2009
In force from
Not determined
Extent
Not stated

How this was established: read from the text as made; no revised version available, so later revocation could not be ruled out.

What the instrument is for

(This note is not part of the Regulations) — the explanatory note published with the instrument, © Crown copyright.

The European Parliamentary Elections (Amendment) Regulations 2009 (“the 2009 Regulations”) amend the European Parliamentary Elections Regulations 2004 (S.I. 2004/293)(“the 2004 Regulations”), which set out in full how European Parliamentary elections are to be conducted. The 2004 Regulations correspond to the provisions of the Representation of the People Acts of 1983 and 1985 and regulations made under them, which they apply subject to modifications. The 2009 Regulations apply for the purposes of European Parliamentary elections the changes to electoral procedures made by the Electoral Administration Act 2006 (c.22) (“the 2006 Act”). They also apply the amendments made for the purposes of implementing the 2006 Act’s provisions by the Representation of the People (England and Wales) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/2910), the Representation of the People (Scotland)(Amendment) Regulations 2007 (S.I. 2007/925), the Representation of the People (Scotland)(Amendment) Regulations 2008 (S.I. 2008/305), the Representation of the People (England and Wales) (Combination of Polls) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/3278) and the Service Voters’ Registration Period Order 2006 (S.I. 2006/3406). They also reflect other amendments to subordinate legislation made since the 2004 Regulations were made. The amendments made to the 2004 Regulations reflect the changes made by the 2006 Act to the Representation of the People Act 1983 (c.2) (“the 1983 Act”). Regulation 11 of these Regulations amends regulation 15 of the 2004 Regulations to bring the provisions relating to payments to and by returning officers at European Parliamentary elections into line with the provision made at parliamentary elections by section 29 of the 1983 Act. Regulation 27 of the 2009 Regulations amends the 2004 Regulations so that the definition of “election expenses” made in the 2004 Regulations mirrors that made in section 90ZA of, and Schedule 4A to, the 1983 Act (as inserted by section 27 of the 2006 Act). The provisions relating to time limits for prosecutions in regulation 114 of the 2004 Regulations, as substituted by regulation 37 of the 2009 Regulations, reflect the amendments made to section 176 of the 1983 Act by section 70 of the 2006 Act. New regulation 122A of the 2004 Regulations, as inserted by regulation 38, makes provision which is equivalent to section 199B of the 1983 Act (translations etc. of certain documents) as inserted by section 36 of the 2006 Act. Schedule 2 to the Regulations replaces the European Parliamentary elections rules in Schedule 1 to the 2004 Regulations. The European Parliamentary elections rules in Schedule 1 to these Regulations apply, with modifications and exceptions, the Parliamentary elections rules set out in Schedule 1 to the 1983 Act. The rules differ from the 2004 rules by including, with relevant modifications, the amendments to the Parliamentary elections rules made by the 2006 Act. Particular changes resulting from the 2006 Act are mentioned below. The rules reflect new security measures introduced by the 2006 Act. Security markings on ballot papers are provided for; so too are unique identifying marks. Counterfoils on ballot papers are replaced by corresponding number lists. The rules reflect the changes made as to the persons who may be admitted to polling stations and to count to observe elections. Amendments are made in consequence of the provisions in section 13B of the 1983 Act, as amended by section 11 of the 2006 Act, which moved the deadline for applying for registration closer to polling day. Amendments are made to provide for the transmission of information to a presiding officer about alterations to the electoral register taking place on the day of the poll. Amendments consequential to the introduction of a scheme for the anonymous registration of certain electors are made. The rules reflect the changes made regarding the retention and inspection of election documents after the poll. Consequential amendments are made to the forms prescribed for use at European Parliamentary elections. Schedule 3 to the 2009 Regulations replaces Schedule 2 to the 2004 Regulations and provides for absent voting at European Parliamentary elections. The amended Schedule 2 reflects the changes made to Schedule 4 of the Representation of the People Act 2000 (c. 2) and the regulations made under it, which make provision for absent voting in Great Britain at parliamentary and local elections, by the 2006 Act. In particular, provision is made in the amended Schedule 2 for the collection of personal identifiers from persons applying to vote by post or by proxy at a European Parliamentary election. Postal voters at European Parliamentary elections will be required to provide their signature and date of birth on postal voting statements which they must complete and return with their postal ballot papers. A postal ballot paper will not be deemed to be valid if the postal voting statement does not contain either a signature or date of birth. Local returning officers are required to take steps to verify the signature and date of birth on postal voting statements which involve checking that the identifiers provided on the postal voting statement correspond with those previously provided with the postal vote application. Schedule 4 to these Regulations replaces Schedule 3 to the 2004 Regulations which sets out the modifications needed to the European Parliamentary elections rules when the poll at a European Parliamentary election is taken together with the poll at a relevant election or referendum, meaning a Parliamentary election, a local government election (which includes Greater London Authority elections in London) or referendum, or an election for an elected mayor held under the Local Government Act 2000 (c.22). These Regulations extend to Gibraltar and the changes in electoral law since 2004 are applied to Gibraltar by these Regulations. Changes are also made as a result of the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006. A copy of the Gibraltar Constitution Order 2006 and the Gibraltar Acts referred to in these Regulations can be obtained from www.gibraltarlaws.gov.gi. A full regulatory impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no impact on the private or voluntary sectors is foreseen.

Read the full note and every offence in this instrument

What Parliament said

Mentions of this instrument in Hansard. Parliamentary material is reused under the Open Parliament Licence v3.0.

Other offences in the same instrument

How this was identified as an offence

Everything above rests on the judgement that this provision creates a criminal offence, rather than mentioning one. That judgement is made by rule, from the words of the provision, and this is the rule that made it — with a confidence of 0.92.

Basis
the provision says a person is “guilty of an offence”
Confidence
0.92 of 1.00

A provision that states a penalty for an offence created elsewhere can read very like one that creates an offence, and the rules can mistake the one for the other. If the text quoted above sets a penalty for something made an offence by another provision, treat the classification on this page with that in mind, and read the instrument.

Check the source